Importance: Propofol sedation is widely used for endoscopic procedures, but it poses risks of hemodynamic and respiratory depression. The addition of esketamine as an adjuvant may reduce propofol requirements and associated adverse events.Objective: To evaluate the effects of low-dose esketamine added to propofol-based sedation on desaturation and hypotension during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy.Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial assessed patients from 3 teaching hospitals in China who were scheduled for same-visit bidirectional endoscopy between February 8 and November 30, 2022, and randomly assigned to receive esketamine or normal saline (placebo).Interventions: After induction of sedation with 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol, patients in the esketamine group received 0.15 mg/kg of intravenous esketamine, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of saline. Sedation was achieved through propofol titration.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of desaturation and hypotension during the procedures. Secondary outcomes included desaturation, hypotension, propofol requirements, postprocedure pain and fatigue, nausea or vomiting, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction.Results: Among the 663 initially enrolled patients, 660 completed the study (median [IQR] age, 48 [36-57] years; 355 [53.8%] female), with 331 randomized to the esketamine group and 329 to the placebo group. The administration of esketamine compared with placebo significantly reduced the incidence of the composite outcome of desaturation and hypotension (8.2% vs 21.0%; difference, −12.8 percentage points; odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54; P < .001). Additionally, esketamine led to significantly lower incidences of desaturation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.72; false discovery rate q = .01) and hypotension (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; q < .001) and reduced propofol requirements (difference, −58.9 mg; 95% CI, −65.7 to −52.2 mg; q < .001), without significant effects on other secondary outcomes.Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy, the administration of low-dose esketamine resulted in an approximately 61% reduction in the incidence of desaturation and hypotension, accompanied by decreased propofol requirements. These findings support the use of esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol-based sedation in endoscopic procedures.Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055938

Objectives: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared ultrasound-guided TAP block with control for analgesia in adult patients undergoing LC. The original data were pooled for the meta-analysis using Review Manager 5. The main outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Out of a total of 77 trials, 7 were included. Results: Compared with control, ultrasound-guided TAP block reduced the following: (1) postoperative pain intensity (visual analog scale: 0-10) both at rest and on movement at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h (at rest: mean difference, MD_{0 h} = -2.19, 95% confidence interval, CI: -3.46 to -0.91, p = 0.0008; on movement: MD_{0 h} = -2.67, 95% CI: -3.86 to -1.48, p < 0.0001); (2) intraoperative fentanyl consumption (MD = -27.85 µg, 95% CI: -44.91 to -10.79, p = 0.001), and (3) morphine consumption in the recovery room (MD = -1.57 mg, 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.14, p = 0.03) and 0-24 h postoperatively. Fewer patients required analgesics in the recovery room when receiving TAP blocks (risk ratio, RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.62, p = 0.0003). TAP blocks also reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.81, p = 0.006). None of the studies reported symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity. Conclusions: In this study, the ultrasound-guided TAP block was an effective strategy for analgesia in patients undergoing LC.

Premedication is important in pediatric anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of dexmedetomidine as a premedicant for pediatric patients. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine premedication with midazolam or ketamine premedication or placebo in children. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. The original data were pooled for the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5. The main parameters investigated included satisfactory separation from parents, satisfactory mask induction, postoperative rescue analgesia, emergence agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients were included. When compared with midazolam, premedication with dexmedetomidine resulted in an increase in satisfactory separation from parents (RD = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.30, p = 0.003) and a decrease in the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (RD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.09, p = 0.0003). Children treated with dexmedetomidine had a lower heart rate before induction. The incidence of satisfactory mask induction, emergence agitation and PONV did not differ between the groups. Dexmedetomidine was superior in providing satisfactory intravenous cannulation compared to placebo. This meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam premedication because it resulted in enhanced preoperative sedation and decreased postoperative pain. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the dosing schemes and long-term outcomes of dexmedetomidine premedication in pediatric anesthesia.

To investigate whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) preconditioning could alleviate the inflammation caused by myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury by reducing HMGB1-TLR4-MyD88-NF-кB signaling. Seventy rats were randomly assigned into five groups: sham group, myocardial I/R group (I/R), DEX+I/R group (DEX), DEX+yohimbine+I/R group (DEX/YOH), and yohimbine+I/R group (YOH). Animals were subjected to 30 min of ischemia induced by occluding the left anterior descending artery followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size and histological scores were evaluated. The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in serum and myocardium were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88, IκB and NF-κB in the myocardial I/R area were determined with Western blot and immunocytochemistry. Myocardial infarct sizes, histological scores, levels of circulating and myocardial IL-6 and TNF-α, the expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88 and NF-κB, and the degradation of IκB were significantly increased in the I/R group compared with the sham group (P<0.01). DEX preconditioning significantly reduced the myocardial infarct size and histological scores (P<0.01 vs. I/R group). Similarly, the serum and myocardial levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, the expression of HMGB1, TLR4, MyD88 and NF-κB, and the degradation of IκB were significantly reduced in the DEX group (P<0.01 vs. I/R group). These effects were partly reversed by yohimbine, a selective α₂-adrenergic receptor antagonist, while yohimbine alone had no significant effect on any of the above indicators. DEX preconditioning reduces myocardial I/R injury in part by attenuating inflammation, which may be attributed to the downregulation of the HMGB1-TLR4-MyD88-NF-кB signaling pathway mediated by the α₂-adrenergic receptor activation.