Fattore Tobia

Dr. Fattore Tobia

School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 August 2006 in Social Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
JMJan Mason
Jan Mason
EWElizabeth Watson
Elizabeth Watson

5 December 2008 in Child Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
JMJan Mason
Jan Mason
EWElizabeth Watson
Elizabeth Watson

10 August 2018 in Child Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
SFSusann Fegter
Susann Fegter
CHChristine Hunner-Kreisel
Christine Hunner-Kreisel

29 June 2012 in Child Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
JMJan Mason
Jan Mason
EWElizabeth Watson
Elizabeth Watson

1 January 2017
Verified
Book
Closed access
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
JMJan Mason
Jan Mason
EWElizabeth Watson
Elizabeth Watson

1 January 2017 in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASabirah Adams
Sabirah Adams
SSShazly Savahl
Shazly Savahl
FTFattore Tobia
Fattore Tobia
The aim of the study was to explore children’s representations and perceptions of natural spaces using photovoice and community mapping. The sample consisted of 28 children aged 12–14 years residing in urban and rural communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. Data were collected by means of a series of six focus groups interviews (three photovoice discussion groups and three community mapping discussion groups). For the photovoice missions, children were provided with a 28-exposure disposable camera and given 1 week to complete their missions. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data. Three key themes emerged, namely: safe spaces in nature, unsafe spaces in nature, and children’s favourite places in nature. Socio-economic status (SES) was found to be a determining factor in how children make sense of natural spaces. Children from low SES communities indicated being more constricted in their mobility, and were unable to access to safe natural spaces compared to the children from the middle SES community. It is recommended that an expedient starting point would be to work towards and build environmentally and child-friendly communities for children, with children as key contributors in the planning process using a child participation framework.