Mark Limmer

Prof. Mark Limmer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2019 in Sociological Research Online
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKath Hennell
Kath Hennell
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer
MPMaria Piacentini
Maria Piacentini
Social media platforms that enable users to create and share online content with others are used increasingly in social research. This article explores the complex ethical issues associated with using social media for data collection, drawing on a study of the alcohol consumption practices of young people. It aims to contribute to debates about the practical and ethical challenges facing researchers using social media as a data collection tool, and to demonstrate how a reflexive approach to the research and the context in which the research takes place is critically important for supporting and enabling an ethical approach. The article concludes by recommending that researchers who face ethical dilemmas associated with the use of social media maintain an ongoing dialogue with their relevant ethics committees and other researchers to identify potential solutions and to share their findings.

EMElizabeth McDermott
Elizabeth McDermott
AKAlexandra Moira Kaley
Alexandra Moira Kaley
EKEileen Kaner
Eileen Kaner
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer
RMRuth McGovern
Ruth McGovern
LSLiam Spencer
Liam Spencer
Globally, research indicates that LGBTQ+ young people have elevated rates of poor mental health in comparison with their cisgender heterosexual peers. The school environment is a major risk factor and is consistently associated with negative mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ young people. The aim of this UK study was to develop a programme theory that explained how, why, for whom, and in what context school-based interventions prevent or reduce mental health problems in LGBTQ+ young people, through participation with key stakeholders. Online realist interviews were conducted in the UK with (1) LGBTQ+ young people aged between 13–18 years attending secondary schools (N = 10); (2) intervention practitioners (N = 9); and (3) school staff (N = 3). A realist retroductive data analysis strategy was employed to identify causal pathways across different interventions that improved mental health outcomes. The programme theory we produced explains how school-based interventions that directly tackle dominant cisgender and heterosexual norms can improve LGBTQ+ pupils’ mental health. We found that context factors such as a ‘whole-school approach’ and ‘collaborative leadership’ were crucial to the delivery of successful interventions. Our theory posits three causal pathways that might improve mental health: (1) interventions that promote LGBTQ+ visibility and facilitate usualising, school belonging, and recognition; (2) interventions for talking and support that develop safety and coping; and (3) interventions that address institutional school culture (staff training and inclusion polices) that foster school belonging, empowerment, recognition, and safety. Our theoretical model suggests that providing a school environment that affirms and usualises LGBTQ+ identities and promotes school safety and belonging can improve mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ pupils.

6 February 2019 in Harm Reduction Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGitau Mburu
Gitau Mburu
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer
Paula HollandPaula Holland
Paula Holland
Injecting drug users are at high risk of HIV infection globally. Research related to female drug users is rare in Kenya, yet it is required to inform the development of gender-sensitive HIV prevention and harm reduction services in East Africa, where injecting drug use is on the rise. This study aimed to document the nature of HIV risks encountered by women who inject drugs in the Mombasa and Kilifi, Kenya. Secondary data analysis was conducted on an existing dataset from a 2015 primary qualitative study involving 24 interviews and 3 focus group discussions with 45 women who inject drugs. These were complemented with five interviews with key stakeholders involved in the provision of services to women who inject drugs. Guided by the social ecology theory, a thematic analysis was conducted to identify the nature of HIV risks and their underlying determinants. HIV risk behaviours fell into two broad categories: unsafe injecting and unprotected sex. These risks occurred in the form of sharing of needles, unprotected oral, anal, and vaginal sex, sexual assaults, injecting drug use during sex, sex work, and other types of transactional sex. The primary determinants underlying these risks were a low-risk perception, inequitable gender power, economic pressures, and poor availability of needles and condoms. These social-ecological determinants did not exist in isolation, but intersected with each other to create powerful influences which exposed women to HIV. Social-ecological determinants exerted constant influence and created a persistent ‘HIV risk environment’ that was involuntarily experienced by women. Individual, interpersonal, and societal-structural factors intersect to produce HIV risk behaviours. As a minimum, these risks will require a combination of multifaceted micro-level interventions including self-efficacy training, risk assessment skills, couple counselling, and universal access to the recommended harm reduction package. In addition, the current focus on micro-level interventions in Kenya needs to shift to incorporate macro-level interventions, including livelihood, employability, and gender norms-transforming interventions, to mitigate economic and gender-related drivers of HIV risks. In the Kenyan context, injecting drug use during sex work is emerging as an increasingly important HIV risk behaviour needing to be addressed.

11 November 2019 in Critical Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKath Hennell
Kath Hennell
MPMaria Piacentini
Maria Piacentini
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer
Developing a deep and contextualised understanding of risk is important for public health responses to young people’s alcohol consumption, which is frequently positioned as an outcome of risky behaviour. This paper expands conceptualisations of risk to encompass its wider social and cultural context through a social practice exploration of young people’s controlled and managed intoxicated alcohol consumption practice. We report data from a fourteen-month qualitative study of the alcohol consumption practices of 23 young people in England, drawing on group interviews and social media interactions. Our findings provide a nuanced understanding of risk-taking, demonstrating that risk is an important aspect of the ongoing participation and performance in alcohol consumption practice and that health information and advice can be and was frequently incorporated into drinking practice without contributing to fundamental change. This raises new questions about the effectiveness of health interventions that focus on the individual, discussed in the final section of the paper.

1 February 2019 in Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSteve Marshall
Steve Marshall
AGAnne Grinyer
Anne Grinyer
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer
The concept of liminality has been applied to both the experience of adolescence and to the experience of a cancer diagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore how the concept of liminality can be applied to a cohort of patients experiencing both adolescence and cancer concurrently. Thematic analysis was applied to data from interviews with 17 participants who had been treated for cancer between the ages of 15 and 24 in an adult hospital. As the analysis developed, it became apparent that liminality was a useful conceptual framework to be applied to the data. Participants experienced the liminality of both adolescence and cancer. Four subthemes revealed the interaction of these two liminal states: an oscillation between childhood and adulthood; a disassociation from noncancer peers; a strong connection with other adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer; and a lack of connection with older cancer peers. A model of dual liminality provides a unique conceptualization of the AYA cancer experience. Cancer in the AYA years is depicted as a navigation of two compounding transitional periods. Adolescence and cancer exacerbate one another and impede the AYA's ability to progress through either. It is this compounding of two transitional periods that makes the model of dual liminality valuable to an understanding of AYAs with cancer.

17 December 2019 in Sociology of Health & Illness
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKath Hennell
Kath Hennell
MPMaria Piacentini
Maria Piacentini
MLMark Limmer
Mark Limmer