Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The primary analysis of the Early positron emission tomography (ePET) Response–Adapted Treatment in localized Hodgkin Lymphoma H10 Trial demonstrated that in ePET-negative patients, the risk of relapse increased when involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) was omitted and that in ePET-positive patients, switching from doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) to bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) significantly improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Here, we report the final results of a preplanned analysis at a 10-year follow-up. In the favorable (F) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 98.8% versus 85.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 13.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 55.8; P value for noninferiority = .9735; difference test P < .0001) in favor of ABVD + INRT; in the unfavorable (U) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 91.4% and 86.5% (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.75; P value for noninferiority = .8577; difference test P = .1628). In ePET-positive patients, the difference in terms of PFS between standard ABVD and intensified BEACOPPesc was no longer statistically significant (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.20; P = .1777). In conclusion, the present long-term analysis confirms that in ePET-negative patients, the omission of INRT is associated with lower 10-year PFS. Instead, in ePET-positive patients, no significant difference between standard and experimental arms emerged although intensification with BEACOPPesc was safe, with no increase in late adverse events, namely, second malignancies.

Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder that includes various clinico-pathological subtypes. According to clinical course, CD is divided into unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD). MCD is further distinguished based on the etiological driver in herpes virus-8-related MCD (that can occur in the setting of HIV); in MCD associated with POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes); and idiopathic MCD (iMCD). The latter can also be divided in iMCD-TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, myelofibrosis, organomegaly) and iMCD not otherwise specified. To date, CD pathogenesis is still uncertain, but CD may represent the histological and clinical result of heterogeneous pathomechanisms. Transcriptome investigations in CD lymph nodes have documented the expression and up-regulation of different cytokines; furthermore, few recent studies have shown alterations of different T-cell subsets in CD patients, suggesting a possible role of the nodal microenvironment in CD development. On this basis, our study aimed to investigate the distribution of T-cell subsets in the clinico-pathological spectrum of CD. We evaluated the CD4/CD8 ratio and the number of T-regulatory (T-reg) FOXP3+ cells in 28 CD cases. In total, 32% of cases showed a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio due to increased CD8+ T-cells, including both UCD, iMCD, and HHV8+ MCD cases. The T-reg subset analysis revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) lower mean number of FOXP3+ T-reg cells in CD cases when compared with non-specific reactive lymph nodes. We did not find statistically significant differences in T-reg numbers between the different CD subtypes. These findings may suggest that alterations in T-cell subpopulations that can lead to disruption of immune system control may contribute to the numerous changes in different cellular compartments that characterize CD.

Introduction: Castleman disease (CD) represents a spectrum of heterogeneous lymphoproliferative disorders sharing peculiar histopathological features, clinically subdivided into unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD) and presenting with variable inflammatory symptoms. Interleukin (IL)‐6 and other cytokines play a major role in mediating CD inflammatory manifestations. Although the local microenvironment seems to be among the major sources of hypercytokinemia, the precise cellular origin of IL‐6 production in CD is still debated.Methods: A series of five nodal CD of different subtypes (one UCD, two idiopathic MCDs [iMCDs], one HIV‐negative human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8)‐associated MCD, and one HIV‐positive HHV8‐associated MCD) and a non‐CD reactive control were tested using RNAscope analysis and a dual in situ hybridization (ISH)/immunohistochemistry technique, in order to quantify IL‐6 expression and its spatial distribution. Quantitative analyses of in situ mRNA were performed on digitalized slides using the HISTOQUANT software (3DHISTECH) and differences between cases were evaluated by the Kruskal‐Wallis test.Results: RNA‐ISH documented increased IL‐6 expression in all CD lymph nodes, independently from clinical and pathological subtypes, however, the highest levels were found in HHV8+ cases and statistically significant differences in IL‐6 expression were found only between HHV8+ MCD and control case. Dual RNA‐ISH for IL6 coupled with immunohistochemistry analysis showed that IL‐6 was overexpressed in CD31‐positive endothelial cells in 5/5 CD tested cases but not in the control case.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that nodal IL‐6 expression seems to be significantly upregulated in HHV8+ MCD, but a trend toward increased nodal IL‐6 expression was noticed also in UCD and iMCD‐not otherwise specified. CD31+ endothelial cells probably represent one of the major sources of IL‐6 production in the nodal microenvironment.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of levetiracetam (LVT) prophylaxis on the incidence and severity of immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients undergoing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for LBCL (large B-cell lymphoma). A propensity score–matched cohort of 254 patients was analyzed, comparing those receiving LVT prophylaxis (LTV-yes) with those not receiving it (LTV-no), in a 1:1 ratio. The results showed no significant difference in the occurrence of ICANS of any grade between the 2 groups (32.3% in LVT-no vs 37.1% in LVT-yes; P = .29), or in severe ICANS (grades 2-4, 15.1% vs 16.1% [P = .80]; grade 3-4, 7.9% vs 9.7% [P = .71]). The use of LVT was associated with a higher incidence of early immune effector cell–associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), with grade 2 to 4 ICAHT occurring in 37.3% vs 63.9% (P < .001) of patients in the LVT-no and LVT-yes groups, respectively. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P = .337 and .670). Nonrelapse mortality rates were comparable (P = .77). These findings suggest that routine use of LVT as prophylaxis for ICANS in CAR-T therapy is not effective, and further research is needed to refine its role in selected populations or after ICANS treatment.

We applied three major comorbidity scoring systems-CIRS, HCT-CI, and Severe4-to a cohort of 379 patients with LBCL treated with CAR-T therapy. A high comorbidity burden was identified in 7% to 34% of patients, depending on the score used. However, a high comorbidity burden did not negatively impact the tolerability of CAR-T treatment, including the incidence of CRS, or hematologic toxicity. The use of tocilizumab and corticosteroids was comparable between patients with low and high comorbidity burden, as was the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality.