Doris Goubran

Doris Goubran

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2023 in Tomography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDoris Goubran
Doris Goubran
DBDivjeet Batoo
Divjeet Batoo
JLJanice Linton
Janice Linton
JSJai Shankar
Jai Shankar
The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze evidence based on existing studies on the ability of initial CT imaging to predict mortality in severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in pediatric patients. An experienced librarian searched for all existing studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were screened by two blinded reviewers. Of the 3277 studies included in the search, data on prevalence of imaging findings and mortality rate could only be extracted from 22 studies. A few of those studies had patient-specific data relating specific imaging findings to outcome, allowing the data analysis, calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and generation of a forest plot for each finding. The data were extracted to calculate the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predicted value (NPV), AUC, and ROC for extradural hematoma (EDH), subdural hematoma (SDH), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH), skull fractures, and edema. There were a total of 2219 patients, 747 females and 1461 males. Of the total, 564 patients died and 1651 survived; 293 patients had SDH, 76 had EDH, 347 had tSAH, 244 had skull fractures, and 416 had edema. The studies included had high bias and lower grade of evidence. Out of the different CT scan findings, brain edema had the highest SN, PPV, NPV, and AUC. EDH had the highest SP to predict in-hospital mortality.

10 June 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMegan Delisle
Megan Delisle
VIVictoria Ivankovic
Victoria Ivankovic
DGDoris Goubran
Doris Goubran
EPEliane Yvonne Castillo Paglicauan
Eliane Yvonne Castillo Paglicauan
MAMariam Alsobaei
Mariam Alsobaei
KDKristopher Dennis
Kristopher Dennis
Purpose: Organ preservation (OP) is an increasingly recognized treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, variability in patient selection, treatment regimens, and surveillance can hinder widespread adoption. We conducted a national, cross-sectional survey evaluating how OP is implemented across Canada. Methods: Between June and July 2023, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists with expertise in OP from all 44 Canadian radiation centers completed an electronic survey about the implementation of OP at their centers. Primary OP was defined as administering neoadjuvant therapy with the explicit goal of avoiding surgery. Secondary OP was defined as deferring planned surgery only when there was an unexpected yet sufficient clinical response. Results: Responses from 40 radiation centers (response rate 90.9%) identified that 20 (50.0%) offered primary and secondary OP, 11 (27.8%) offered only secondary, and 8 (20.0%) offered neither. The most common treatment in primary OP was chemoradiation with consolidation chemotherapy (17/20, 89.5%). When assessing the response in primary OP, endoscopic biopsies were more commonly performed with a near-complete response (10/20, 50.0%) than a complete response (4/20, 20.0%). Watch-and-wait surveillance was more frequently offered for a complete response (17/31, 54.8%) than a near-complete response (4/31, 12.9%). Challenges included limited MRI (21/40, 52.5%), clinic time (18/40, 45.0%), timely surgery if required (16/40, 40.0%), and limited familiarity with the protocols and evidence (15/40, 37.5%). Conclusion: OP is recognized nationwide but is inconsistently implemented. Challenges raise concerns about the current feasibility of OP in Canada and highlight the need for less resource-intensive, complex OP protocols.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMina Mina
Mina Mina
AGAjay Kumar Goel
Ajay Kumar Goel
FMFady Mina
Fady Mina
DGDoris Goubran
Doris Goubran
NGNand Goel
Nand Goel
Over 2.2 billion people across the globe face significant barriers to accessing essential ophthalmic care, with elderly, rural, and refugee populations being disproportionately affected, deepening existing disparities in eye care. Three-dimensional printing is a novel technology that has the potential to transform the field and improve access by alleviating many patient-specific barriers. This article delves into the evolution of 3D printing within ophthalmology, highlighting its current applications and future potential. It explores various 3D printing techniques and numerous biomaterials discussing their effectiveness in creating advanced solutions such as bioengineered corneas, ocular prosthetics, and innovative treatments for dry eye syndrome, from punctal plugs to lacrimal gland models. Additionally, 3D printing has revolutionized drug delivery systems for conditions like glaucoma, retinal diseases, and ocular brachytherapy. Whether through 3D printed contact lens-based drug delivery systems or polycaprolactone implants that biodegrade and provide sustained drug release without adverse effects, these systems hold immense potential in the field. Despite its promise, the integration of 3D printing into clinical practice presents challenges, which the article addresses alongside strategies for overcoming them. By mapping out the technological advancements and challenges, this review offers a roadmap for enhancing global eye care accessibility and improving patient outcomes on a global scale.

14 January 2025 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBhavan Dhaliwal
Bhavan Dhaliwal
DGDoris Goubran
Doris Goubran
OFOrest Fylyma
Orest Fylyma
ISIna Siwach
Ina Siwach
NANicole Askin
Nicole Askin
MDMegan Delisle
Megan Delisle
Introduction Modern surgery incorporates many aspects of care, including preoperative workup, surgical management and multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve favourable outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Current literature identifies variability in surgical practice and quality of care. The objective of this study is to fill the gap in the literature by identifying modifiable surgeon behavioural factors influencing the quality of care and to identify interventions and policies that modify these factors. Methods and analysis This scoping review will be reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review guidelines. The protocol was drafted according to JBI Best Practice Guidance and Reporting Items for the Development of Scoping Review Protocols. A comprehensive search encompassing five databases (OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Cochrane Library (Central) and SCOPUS) was conducted. Search terms included ‘surgeons’, ‘surgeon characteristics’, ‘quality of care’ and ‘outcomes’ using AND, OR and ADJ2 Boolean operators. Studies describing interventions aimed at modifying behavioural surgeon factors influencing the quality of healthcare will be included. Studies describing institutional or system factors will be excluded. Searches were limited from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2024 to capture modern surgery practices. Searches were peer reviewed as per Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015. Two independent reviewers will perform a title and abstract screening using DistillerSR and extract data on the participants, study methods, modifiable surgeon factors and interventions that modify these factors. The data will be qualitatively analysed using the COM-B Framework which describes how capability, motivation and opportunity constitute behaviour. We expect to compile a list of existing interventions aimed at modifying surgeon behaviours, analysing the success of existing interventions to improve patient outcomes and identifying modifiable surgeon factors that do not have interventions. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval and patient consent are not required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

29 August 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MMMina Mina
Mina Mina
AGAjay Kumar Goel
Ajay Kumar Goel
FMFady Mina
Fady Mina
DGDoris Goubran
Doris Goubran
NGNand Goel
Nand Goel
Over 2.2 billion people across the globe face significant barriers to accessing essential ophthalmic care, with elderly, rural, and refugee populations being disproportionately affected. These obsta-cles deepen existing disparities in eye care. 3D printing is a novel technology that has the potential to transform the field and improve access through alleviating many patient-specific barriers. This article delves into the evolution of 3D printing within ophthalmology, highlighting its current ap-plications and future potential. It explores various 3D printing techniques and biomaterials, dis-cussing their effectiveness in creating advanced solutions such as bioengineered corneas, ocular prosthetics, and innovative treatments for dry eye syndrome. Additionally, 3D printing has rev-olutionized drug delivery systems for conditions like glaucoma, retinal diseases, and for ocular brachytherapy. Despite its promise, the integration of 3D printing into clinical practice presents challenges, which the article addresses alongside strategies for overcoming them. By mapping out the technological advancements and challenges, this review offers a roadmap for enhancing global eye care accessibility and improving patient outcomes on a global scale.