Since SARS-CoV-2 emerged in 2019, strict monitoring of post-COVID-19 patients in order to ensure the early detection of sequelae and/or chronic organ damage that could been associated with the infection has been essential. Potential involvement of the NO pathway in the development of post-COVID-19 lung fibrotic alterations is feasible, since the majority of respiratory cells can produce NO, and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) represents a biomarker of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility of multiple-flow FeNO parameters in a post-COVID-19 population and to compare it with other indicators of lung damage proposed in the literature. We enrolled 20 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, who underwent clinical, respiratory functional (including PFTs and FeNO) and radiological follow-up after discharge. Compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls, post-COVID-19 patients showed significantly higher FeNO 350 mL/s and CaNO levels. Moreover, among the parameters included in the follow-up, CaNO showed the best accuracy in indicating predominant fibrotic changes and GGO at CT scan. To our knowledge, this preliminary study has investigated for the first time multiple-flow FeNO parameters in a post-COVID-19 population. The evidence of increased CaNO values may imply the persistence of alveolar and bronchiolar inflammation and/or a mild impairment of the alveolar-capillary membrane in these patients.

Background: Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare disease that consists of elastofibrosis that involves the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma; it is an unusual pulmonary disease with unique clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. According to recent studies, PPFE may not be a definite disease but a form of chronic lung injury. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the incidence and to evaluate the distribution, severity and progression of this radiological entity on high-resolution CT (HRCT) exams of the chest, performed in routine clinical practice. In total, 1514 HRCT exams performed in the period January 2016–June 2018 were analyzed. For each exam, the presence of PPFE was evaluated and a quantitative score was assigned (from 0 to 7 points, based on the maximum depth of fibrotic involvement of the parenchyma). When available, two exams with a time interval of at least 6 months were compared for each patient in order to evaluate progression (defined as the increase in the disease score). Patients were divided into different groups according to exposure and their associated diseases. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Wilcoxon test and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: PPFE was detected in 174 out of 1514 patients (11.6%), with a mean score of 6.1 ± 3.9 (range 1–14). In 106 out of 174 patients (60.9%), a previous CT scan was available and an evolution of PPFE was detected in 19 of these (11.5%). Among these 19 patients with worsening PPFE, 4 had isolated PPFE that was associated with chronic exposure or connective tissue disorders, and the other 15 had an associated lung disease and/or a chronic exposure. In this group, it was found that the ventral segments of the upper lobes, fissures and apical segments of the lower lobes had a greater statistically significant involvement in the progression of the disease compared to the non-progressive group. In 16 of 174 patients (9.2%, 7 of which belonged to the radiological progression group) a biopsy through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or apicoectomy confirmed PPFE. Conclusion: PPFE-like lesions are not uncommon on HRCT exams in routine clinical practice, and are frequently found in patients with different forms of chronic lung injury. Further studies are necessary to explain why the disease progresses in some cases, while in most, it remains stationary over time.