Guang Wu

Dr. Guang Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 June 2014 in Geological Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJun Liu
Jun Liu
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
HQHua-Ning Qiu
Hua-Ning Qiu
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li

3 January 2024 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJiangpeng Shi
Jiangpeng Shi
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
GCGongzheng Chen
Gongzheng Chen
FYFei Yang
Fei Yang
TZTong Zhang
Tong Zhang
Wenyuan LiuWenyuan Liu
Wenyuan Liu
The supergiant Shuangjianzishan (SJS) Ag–Pb–Zn deposit, located in the southern Great Xing’an Range (SGXR), is the largest Ag deposit in China. The SJS deposit can be divided into two ore blocks: the Shuangjianzishan ore block and the Xinglongshan ore block. Given the importance of the Xinglongshan ore block in the SJS deposit, our work is focused on the Xinglongshan ore block. The vein orebodies in the Xionglongshan ore block mainly occur in the NW-, NNW-, and NNE-trending fault zones, and its mineralization is mainly related to a deep concealed syenogranite. Here, we present new geochronology, isotope geochemistry, and fluid inclusion data for the Xinglongshan ore block and provide additional insights into the metallogenic mechanism of the deposit. The dating results show that the syenogranite related to the mineralization formed at approximately 137 Ma, which is coherent with some previous age determinations in sulfides from the ore deposit. The mineralization of the Xinglongshan ore block can be divided into four stages: sphalerite–arsenopyrite–pyrite–chalcopyrite–quartz stage (stage I), sphalerite–galena–pyrite–silver-bearing mineral–quartz stage (stage II), sphalerite–galena–silver-bearing mineral–quartz–calcite stage (stage III), and weakly mineralized quartz–calcite stage (stage IV). Four types of fluid inclusions (FIs) have been identified within quartz and calcite veins: liquid-rich, gas-rich, pure-liquid, and pure-gas FIs. The homogenization temperatures in the four stages exhibit a gradual decrease, with stage I ranging from 253 to 302 °C, stage II from 203 to 268 °C, stage III from 184 to 222 °C, and stage IV from 153 to 198 °C, respectively. The salinity for stages I, II, III, and IV falls within the ranges of 3.4–6.6 wt% NaCl eqv., 2.6–7.2 wt% NaCl eqv., 2.9–7.0 wt% NaCl eqv., and 1.2–4.8 wt% NaCl eqv., respectively, indicative of a low-salinity ore-forming fluid. The δ18Owater and δD values of the ore-forming fluid span from −13.9‰ to 7.4‰ and −145‰ to −65‰, with δ13CV-PDB values between −11.0‰ and −7.9‰. These values suggest that the ore-forming fluid predominantly originated from a mixture of magmatic and meteoric water. The 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios of sulfides range from 18.278 to 18.361, 15.530 to 15.634, and 38.107 to 38.448, respectively. These ratios imply that the ore-forming material was primarily derived from the Early Cretaceous granitic magma, which resulted from the mixing of depleted mantle- and crustal-derived magmas. The fluid mixing was the dominant mechanism for mineral precipitation. The Xinglongshan ore block belongs to a magmatic-hydrothermal vein-type deposit related to the Early Cretaceous syenogranite, and the Shuangjianzishan ore block belongs to an intermediate sulfidation epithermal deposit related to coeval subvolcanic rocks. The Ag–Pb–Zn mineralization at Shuangjianzishan is genetically related to the Early Cretaceous volcanic–intrusive complex.

13 July 2023 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShihui Li
Shihui Li
ZLZhenxiang Li
Zhenxiang Li
GCGongzheng Chen
Gongzheng Chen
HYHuineng Yi
Huineng Yi
FYFei Yang
Fei Yang
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
The superlarge Huaaobaote Ag–Pb–Zn deposit is located on the western slope of the southern Great Xing’an Range (SGXR). The deposit includes four ore blocks, namely, ore blocks I, II, III, and V. Except for the no. I orebody of ore block I, which is hosted in the contact zone between the Carboniferous serpentinized harzburgite and the Permian siltstone, the other orebodies all occur as veins controlled by faults. The mineralization process at the deposit can be divided into four stages: cassiterite–arsenopyrite–pyrite–quartz stage (stage I), cassiterite–chalcopyrite–pyrite–freibergite–arsenopyrite–pyrrhotite–quartz stage (stage II), sphalerite–galena–jamesonite–stibnite–freibergite–silver mineral–quartz–calcite–chlorite stage (stage III), and argentite–pyrargyrite–pyrite–quartz–calcite (stage IV). Cassiterite U–Pb dating of the Huaaobaote deposit yielded ages of 136.3–134.3 Ma, indicating that the deposit formed in the Early Cretaceous period. Two types of fluid inclusions (FIs), including liquid-rich and gas-rich FIs, have been distinguished in the quartz vein and sphalerite. The homogenization temperature during the four stages gradually decreases, with temperatures of 302–340 °C for stage I, 267–304 °C for stage II, 186–273 °C for stage III, and 166–199 °C for stage IV, respectively. The salinity (wt% NaCl eqv.) at stages I, II, III, and IV is 3.7–6.6, 0.2–4.5, 0.2–5.0, and 0.4–1.6, respectively, indicating that the ore-forming fluid is characterized by low salinity. The δ18Owater and δD values of the ore-forming fluid range from −11.9‰ to 7.9‰ and −168‰ to −76‰, respectively, indicating that the ore-forming fluid was dominantly derived from a mixture of magmatic and meteoric water. The calculated δ34SH2S values range from −3.6‰ to 1.2‰, indicating that the sulfur mainly came from granitic magma. The 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios of sulfides are in the ranges of 18.195–18.317, 15.509–15.667, and 37.965–38.475, respectively, implying that the ore-forming material was mainly derived from felsic magma that may be formed by the partial melting of orogenic materials. Fluid mixing, cooling, and immiscibility were the three primary mechanisms for mineral precipitation in the Huaaobaote deposit.

1 January 2023 in Acta Petrologica Sinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGChen Gongzheng
Chen Gongzheng
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
ZLZhenXiang LI
ZhenXiang LI
FYFei Yang
Fei Yang
SLShiHui LI
ShiHui LI
YLYingLei LI
YingLei LI

花敖包特超大型银多金属矿床位于大兴安岭南段,矿体主要呈脉状赋存于二叠系寿山沟组的断裂中,部分矿体呈囊状产于寿山沟组与华力西期蛇绿岩的接触带中。矿体主要包括银铅锌锑矿体、锡铜矿体、铜铅锌矿体、锡矿体和银矿体。花敖包特矿床可划分为4个成矿阶段,分别为石英-锡石-毒砂-黄铁矿阶段(Ⅰ阶段)、石英-绢云母-锡石-黄铜矿-毒砂-磁黄铁矿-闪锌矿-黝铜矿阶段(Ⅱ阶段)、石英-绢云母-萤石-方解石-闪锌矿-方铅矿-黄铁矿-辉锑矿-含银硫盐矿物阶段(Ⅲ阶段)和石英-方解石-黄铁矿-辉银矿-深红银矿阶段(Ⅳ阶段)。对花敖包特矿区2件次流纹岩样品开展了LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年,分别获得135.4±0.8Ma和134.8±0.8Ma的年龄。对成矿Ⅰ阶段锡矿石和Ⅱ阶段锡铜矿石进行了LA-ICP-MS锡石U-Pb定年,分别获得136.3±2.0Ma和134.3±1.7Ma的加权平均年龄。定年结果表明,花敖包特矿床次流纹岩、锡矿体和锡铜矿体均形成于早白垩世。尽管二者形成时间相近,但脉体穿切关系及矿化分带特征均表明次流纹岩并非成矿物质和成矿流体的主要来源。本文认为,花敖包特矿床真正的成矿地质体为隐伏于矿区深部的次火山岩钟,其矿床成因类型为与次火山岩相关的热液矿床。


29 October 2022 in Ore Geology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GCGongzheng Chen
Gongzheng Chen
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
FYFei Yang
Fei Yang
TZTong Zhang
Tong Zhang
TLTiegang Li
Tiegang Li
PZPeichun Zhang
Peichun Zhang

1 January 2023 in Acta Petrologica Sinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GWGuang Wu
Guang Wu
FYFei Yang
Fei Yang
RLRuiHua LI
RuiHua LI
GCGongZheng CHEN
GongZheng CHEN
TZTong Zhang
Tong Zhang
SLShiHui LI
ShiHui LI

毛登-小孤山地区是大兴安岭南段锡多金属成矿带代表性矿区, 由小孤山锡锌矿床和毛登锡钼铋多金属矿床组成。小孤山矿床锡石U-Pb Tera-Wasserburg谐和年龄为134.8±1.9Ma, 表明其形成于早白垩世。该矿床成矿过程可划分为4个阶段: 锡石-黄铁矿-石英-电气石阶段(Ⅰ阶段)、锡石-黄铜矿-闪锌矿-石英-萤石阶段(Ⅱ阶段)、闪锌矿-方铅矿-石英-萤石阶段(Ⅲ阶段)、黄铁矿-石英-方解石阶段(Ⅳ阶段)。小孤山矿床主要发育富液两相包裹体(WL型)、富气两相包裹体(WG型)及含子矿物包裹体(S型)。Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ阶段均发育WL、WG和S型包裹体, Ⅳ阶段仅出现WL型包裹体。从Ⅰ至Ⅳ阶段流体包裹体均一温度/盐度分别为420~443℃/8.3%~52.0% NaCleqv、286~379℃/4.0%~40.2% NaCleqv、214~299℃/3.8%~36.1% NaCleqv、178~195℃/2.1%~3.3% NaCleqv, 表明从早阶段到晚阶段成矿流体由高温高盐度向低温低盐度转化, 且前三个阶段流体盐度波动大, 暗示成矿流体发生了多次沸腾。矿床的δ18O水介于-2.6‰~11.0‰, δD介于-107‰~-91‰, Ⅰ和Ⅱ阶段的成矿流体以岩浆水为主, Ⅲ阶段开始有大气降水的加入。硫化物的δ34SCDT值介于-3.3‰~-0.6‰, 206Pb/204Pb介于17.772~18.427, 207Pb/204Pb介于15.482~15.679, 208Pb/204Pb介于37.668~38.622, 表明成矿物质来源于早白垩世花岗质岩浆。流体沸腾和降温是矿质沉淀的两种主要机制。