Lithiasis is a known side effect of ceftriaxone administration in children. Sex, age, weight, dosage, and duration of intake have been reported as risk factors for the formation of calcification or stones in the bile and urine excretory systems of children who received ceftriaxone. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the reported effects of ceftriaxone administration in pediatric patients who were admitted to a hospital due to infection, the likelihood of gallstones, nephroliths, or precipitations in both the biliary and urinary systems, as well as investigate the relationship with their mother’s history during pregnancy. Original studies and literature reviews from the PubMed database were included in the study. No time limit related to research or publication was set for the articles. The results were evaluated, aiming to understand the outcomes and identify any predisposing factors relevant to this side effect. Of the 181 found articles, 33 were appropriate for inclusion in the systematic review. The administered dose of ceftriaxone presented variability. Symptoms, such as abdominal pain and vomiting, were associated with ceftriaxone-related lithiasis in many cases. It was noted that most of the results were the outcomes of retrospective observation and not of prospective randomized research. Definitively, more randomized control studies with long-term outcomes are needed to identify the exact association between ceftriaxone and lithiasis in children.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of adolescent and young adult males who had testicular prosthesis surgery during their childhood, as well as their own and their parents’ inner perceptions and feelings. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study and one of few with an integrated approach on the QoL of pediatric testicular prosthesis recipients. Methods: Recipients and their parents were interviewed regarding their life with the testicular prosthesis. Major QoL domains (i.e., physical and mental health, interpersonal relationships, sexuality) were assessed. Results: Although there were participants who viewed the outcomes with negativity, most expressed satisfaction. Daily routine returned to normal after a postoperative period with precautions, such as fear of damaging either the implant or the healthy testis. Prosthesis feeling was acceptable and normalized with time, while self-image and self-confidence were boosted by the presence of the prosthesis. All participants outlined the importance of privacy as being kept in the inner family circle. Some exhibited introverted behavior. Regarding sentimental and sexual intimacy, the prosthesis produced anxiety and concern both in experienced recipients and minors, which was moderated by a normal scrotal appearance. Conclusions: Testicular prosthesis surgery performed from childhood to adulthood may create profound and variable concerns, which may affect the recipients and their companions in the long term. Therefore, it should not be considered in a simplistic manner as a routine procedure and should be preceded by thorough conversation with experts.