OBJECTIVE—In type 2 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control, kinetic studies have demonstrated that LDL fractional catabolic rate (FCR) is slowed down, whereas it is normalized on insulin therapy. This study was designed to analyze whether variations in the expression of LDL receptors at the cell surface could explain the results observed in kinetic studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—LDL receptors were quantified at the surface of mononuclear cells in fresh fasting blood samples by a flow cytometry method in 21 control subjects and 21 type 2 diabetic patients before and 3 months after the introduction of insulin therapy and concomitant removal of oral antidiabetic drugs. RESULTS—Before insulin treatment, monocyte LDL receptor expression was reduced by 41% (6,439 ± 2,310 vs. 10,846 ± 2,764 receptors per monocyte, P < 0.001) in type 2 diabetic patients compared with control subjects. It increased by 57% after 3 months of insulin therapy (10,096 ± 5,657 vs. 6,439 ± 2,310, P < 0.01) and was similar to that observed in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS—Our results suggest that insulin plays an important role in the in vivo expression of LDL receptors. Moreover, modulations in the expression of LDL receptors in type 2 diabetic patients either with poor metabolic control or on insulin therapy are likely to contribute to the variations of LDL FCR demonstrated by kinetic studies under those circumstances.

Background: Even though it has been suggested that antiretroviral therapy has an impact on severe hypovitaminosis D (SHD) in HIV infected patients, it could be speculated that the different levels of residual inflammation on HAART (Highly Active Anti Retroviral Therapy) could contribute to SHD and aggravate bone catabolism in these patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an unselected cohort of 263 HIV infected outpatients consulting during Spring 2010. Clinical examinations were performed and medical history, food habits, sun exposure and addictions were collected. Fasting blood samples were taken for immunological, virological, inflammation, endocrine and bone markers evaluations. Results: Ninety-five (36%) patients had SHD. In univariate analysis, a significant and positive association was found between SHD and IL6 (p = 0.001), hsCRP (p = 0.04), increased serum C-Telopeptides X (CTX) (p = 0.005) and Parathyroid Hormon (PTH) (p < 0.0001) levels. In multivariate analysis, SHD deficiency correlated significantly with increased IL-6, high serum CTX levels, lower mean daily exposure to the sun, current or past smoking, hepatitis C, and functional status (falls), but not with the time spent on the current HAART (by specific drug or overall). Conclusions: SHD is frequent and correlates with inflammation in HIV infected patients. Since SHD is also associated with falls and increased bone catabolism, it may be of interest to take into account not only the type of antiretroviral therapy but also the residual inflammation on HAART in order to assess functional and bone risks. This finding also suggests that vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial in these HIV-infected patients.