Extracellular vesicles have emerged as a less-invasive nano-tool for discovering biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia. Here, we analysed different neuron-enriched extracellular vesicles from plasma to predict response and molecular mechanisms of ketogenic diet’s efficacy in mild cognitive impairment participants. The study was a randomized crossover design in which cognitively normal and mild cognitive impairment participants consumed a modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet or American Heart Association diet for 6 weeks, followed by other diet after washout. L1 cell adhesion molecule, synaptophysin and neural cell adhesion molecule surface markers were used to enrich for neuron-secreted small extracellular vesicles (sEV^L1CAM, sEV^SYP and sEV^NCAM). For the first time, we have presented multiple evidences, including immunogold labelling/transmission electron microscopy, clusters of differentiation 63-ELISA-based assay, confocal microscopy fluorescent images and flow cytometry data confirming the presence of L1 cell adhesion molecule on the surface of sEV^L1CAM, validating purity and relative abundance of sEV^L1CAM in the plasma. Cargo analysis of sEV^L1CAM showed that modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet intervention reduces amyloid beta 1–42 (50.3%, P = 0.011), p181-tau (34.9%, P = 0.033) and neurofilament light (54.2%, P = 0.020) in mild cognitive impairment participants. Moreover, sEV^L1CAMshowed better sensitivity compared with CSF in analysing increased glutamate (6-folds, P < 0.0001) from mild cognitive impairment participants following modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet intervention. sEV^L1CAM characterization also suggested that modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet differentially targets the expression of various glutamate receptors—glutamate receptor ionotropic NMDA1, glutamate receptor ionotropic NMDA2A, glutamate receptor ionotropic NMDA2B and glutamate receptor ionotropic AMPA type subunit 1. Importantly, these sEV^L1CAM measures strongly correlated with corresponding clinical CSF biomarkers (neurogranin, amyloid beta 1–42, neurofilament light and tau). Furthermore, sEV^L1CAM were loaded with less advanced glycation endproducts and exhibited anti-inflammatory activity following modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet intervention. Most importantly, the expression of monocarboxylate transporter 2 on the surface of sEV^L1CAM predicted the amyloid beta 1–42 response to modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet intervention (area under the curve = 0.87, P = 0.0044) and offered a novel screening tool to identify participants responsive to this dietary intervention. Finally, sEV^L1CAM, sEV^SYP and sEV^NCAM showed significantly high concordance in analysing amyloid beta 1–42 (Pearson correlation coefficient ≥ 0.63, P < 0.01) and neurofilament light (Pearson correlation coefficient ≥ 0.49, P < 0.05). Together, small extracellular vesicles in plasma offers promise in assessing the efficacy of dietary/therapeutic intervention against mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer’s disease.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor and confers a dismal prognosis. With only two FDA-approved therapeutics showing modest survival gains since 2005, there is a great need for the development of other disease-targeted therapies. Due, in part, to the profound immunosuppressive microenvironment seen in GBMs, there has been a broad interest in immunotherapy. In both GBMs and other cancers, therapeutic vaccines have generally yielded limited efficacy, despite their theoretical basis. However, recent results from the DCVax-L trial provide some promise for vaccine therapy in GBMs. There is also the potential that future combination therapies with vaccines and adjuvant immunomodulating agents may greatly enhance antitumor immune responses. Clinicians must remain open to novel therapeutic strategies, such as vaccinations, and carefully await the results of ongoing and future trials. In this review of GBM management, the promise and challenges of immunotherapy with a focus on therapeutic vaccinations are discussed. Additionally, adjuvant therapies, logistical considerations, and future directions are discussed.

Background: Survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) increased in the 2000s, most prominently after the addition of temozolomide to the standard-of-care treatment protocol. The reason for subsequent improvements in survival in the late 2000s and early 2010s was less clear, with explanations including the introduction of bevacizumab, better surgical methods, and advances in supportive care. It is uncertain whether the trend of improving population-level survival has continued. Materials and Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was analyzed comparing survival of adult GBM patients diagnosed in consecutive 3-year periods from 2000 to 2017. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: A total of 38,352 patients diagnosed with GBM between 2000 and 2017 met inclusion criteria. Median survival and percent survival to 12 and 24 months all progressively increased between 2000 and 2011. There were no significant differences in survival comparing 2009-2011 with 2012-2014 or 2015-2017. During the 2015-2017 period, median survival was 11 months, with 12 and 24-month survival proportions of 45.7% (95% confidence interval, 44.5-47.0) and 19.0% (95% confidence interval, 18.6-21.2), respectively. Conclusions: After a period of progressive improvement in GBM survival between 2000 and 2011, survival plateaued. Subsequent advances since 2011 have not yet been translated to improved survival on the population-level as of 2017.

OBJECTIVE: Medulloblastomas are embryonal tumors predominantly affecting children. Recognition of molecularly defined subgroups has advanced management. Factors influencing the management and prognosis of adult patients with medulloblastoma remains poorly understood. METHODS: We examined management, prognostic factors, and when possible molecular subgroup differences (subset) in adult medulloblastoma patients (>18 years) from our center (specialty Neuro-Oncology clinic within a large academic practice) diagnosed between 1992-2020. Molecular subtyping corresponding to the 2021 WHO Classification was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates (with Log-rank test) were performed for univariate survival analysis with cox regression used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We included 76 adult medulloblastoma patients (62% male), with a median age of 32 years at diagnosis (range: 18-66), and median follow-up of 7.7 years (range: 0.6-27). A subset of 58 patients had molecular subgroup characterization – 37 SHH-activated, 12 non-WNT/non-SHH, and 9 WNT-activated. 67% underwent gross total resection, 75% received chemotherapy at diagnosis, and 97% received craniospinal irradiation with boost. Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 14.8 years. The 2, 5, and 10-year OS was 93% (95% CI: 88-99%), 86% (78-94%), and 64% (53-78%), respectively. Survival was longer for younger patients (≥30 years old: 9.9 years; 15.4 years; Log-rank p<0.001). There was no survival difference by molecular subgroup or extent of resection. Only age at diagnosis remained significant in multivariate survival analyses. CONCLUSION: We report one of the largest retrospective cohorts in adult medulloblastoma patients with molecular subtyping. Survival and molecular subgroup frequencies were similar to prior reports. Survival was better for adult patients younger than 30 years at diagnosis and was not significantly different by molecular subgroup or management characteristics (extent of resection, RT characteristics, or chemotherapy timing or regimen).

This study aimed to determine whether proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) decreased the dose to normal tissue and resulted in less toxicity than photon CSI for adult patients. This single-institution retrospective analyzed differences in radiation doses, acute toxicity, and cost between proton and CSI for adult medulloblastoma patients. Of 39 total patients, 20 were treated with photon CSI prior to 2015, and 19 were treated with proton CSI thereafter. Median age was 28 years (range 18–66). The molecular subtype was most commonly sonic hedgehog (68%). Patients most commonly received 36 Gy CSI in 20 fractions with a boost to 54–55.8 Gy (92%). Proton CSI delivered significantly lower mean doses to cochleae, lacrimal glands, lens, parotid glands, pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, lungs, liver, and skin (all P < .001). Patients receiving proton CSI had significantly lower rates of acute dysphagia of any grade (5% versus 35%, P = .044) and decreased median weight loss during radiation (+1.0 versus –2.8 kg, P = .011). Weight loss was associated with acute hospitalization (P = .009). Median follow-up was 2.9 and 12.9 years for proton and photon patients, respectively, limiting late toxicity and outcome comparisons. At the last follow-up, 5 photon patients had died (2 of progressive disease, 3 without recurrence ages 41–63) and 21% had experienced major cardiovascular events. At 10 years, 89% were alive and 82% were recurrence free. This study demonstrates dosimetric improvements with proton CSI, potentially leading to decreased acute toxicity including dysphagia and weight loss during treatment.