Migraine is a common, chronic dysfunctional disease with recurrent headaches. Its etiology and pathogenesis have not been fully understood and there is a lack of objective diagnostic criteria and biomarkers. Meanwhile, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) is increasingly being used in migraine research to classify and diagnose brain disorders. However, the RS-fMRI data is characterized by a large amount of data information and the difficulty of extracting high-dimensional features, which brings great challenges to relevant studies. In this paper, we proposed an automatic recognition framework based on static functional connectivity (sFC) strength features and dynamic functional connectome pattern (DFCP) features of migraine sufferers and normal control subjects, in which we firstly extracted sFC strength and DFCP features and then selected the optimal features using the recursive feature elimination based on the support vector machine (SVM−RFE) algorithm and, finally, trained and tested a classifier with the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. In addition, we compared the classification performance of only using sFC strength features and DFCP features, respectively. The results showed that the DFCP features significantly outperformed sFC strength features in performance, which indicated that DFCP features had a significant advantage over sFC strength features in classification. In addition, the combination of sFC strength and DFCP features had the optimal performance, which demonstrated that the combination of both features could make full use of their advantage. The experimental results suggested the method had good performance in differentiating migraineurs and our proposed classification framework might be applicable for other mental disorders.

Migraine seriously affects the physical and mental health of patients because of its recurrence and the hypersensitivity to the environment that it causes. However, the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of migraine are not fully understood. We addressed this issue in the present study using an autodynamic functional connectome model (A-DFCM) with twice-clustering to compare dynamic functional connectome patterns (DFCPs) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from migraine patients and normal control subjects. We used automatic localization of segment points to improve the efficiency of the model, and intergroup differences and network metrics were analyzed to identify the neural mechanisms of migraine. Using the A-DFCM model, we identified 17 DFCPs—including 1 that was specific and 16 that were general—based on intergroup differences. The specific DFCP was closely associated with neuronal dysfunction in migraine, whereas the general DFCPs showed that the 2 groups had similar functional topology as well as differences in the brain resting state. An analysis of network metrics revealed the critical brain regions in the specific DFCP; these were not only distributed in brain areas related to pain such as Brodmann area 1/2/3, basal ganglia, and thalamus but also located in regions that have been implicated in migraine symptoms such as the occipital lobe. An analysis of the dissimilarities in general DFCPs between the 2 groups identified 6 brain areas belonging to the so-called pain matrix. Our findings provide insight into the neural mechanisms of migraine while also identifying neuroimaging biomarkers that can aid in the diagnosis or monitoring of migraine patients.

Research on the neural mechanisms underlying brain asymmetry in patients with migraine patients using fMRI is insufficient. This study proposed using lateralized algorithms for functional connectivity and brain network topology and investigated changes in their lateralization in patients with migraine. In study 1, laterality indices of functional connectivity (LFunctionCorr) and brain network topological properties (LBetweennessCentrality, LDegree, and LStrength) were defined. Differences between migraineurs and normal subjects were compared at whole-brain, half-brain, and region levels. In study 2, laterality indices were used to classify migraine and were validated using independent samples and the segment method for repeatability. In study 3, abnormal brain regions related to migraine were extracted based on the classification results and differences analysis. Study 1 found no significant differences related to in for migraine at the whole-brain level; however, significant differences were identified at the half-brain level for the hemispheric lateralization of the LFunctionCorr, while 11 significantly different brain regions were also identified at the brain region level. Furthermore, the classification accuracy in study 2 was 0.9366. With repeated validation, the accuracy reached 0.8561. Furthermore, after extending the samples according to the segmentation strategy, the classification accuracies were improved to 0.9408 and 0.8585. Study 3 identified 10 crucial brain regions with asymmetrical specificity based on laterality indices distributed across the visual network, the frontoparietal control network, the default mode network, the salience/ventral attention network and the limbic system. The results revealed novel insights and avenues for research into the mechanisms of migraine asymmetry and showed that the laterality indices could be used as a potential diagnostic imaging marker for migraine.