Deborah Robinson

Prof. Deborah Robinson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

3 January 2018 in British Journal of Guidance & Counselling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDeborah Robinson
Deborah Robinson
NMNicki Moore
Nicki Moore
THTristram Hooley
Tristram Hooley
This article examines the implications of the new education, health and care (EHC) planning process for career professionals in England. The new process comes in the wake of a succession of legislation relating to young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in England. There is much to recommend the new process as it represents a shift to a more holistic and person-centred approach. However, there are four main criticisms which can be made of the new process: (1) the policy has an excessive focus on paid work as an outcome which is unrealistic (for some young people); (2) the resourcing in local authorities is too limited to successfully operationalise the policy; (3) there is a lack of clarity about the professional base delivering EHC planning (especially in relation to the career elements); and (4) the policy is too narrowly targeted. While the new legislation offers some major opportunities, realising these will be difficult. In this paper, questions are raised about the resources required to deliver these services; the responsibilities relevant to such services; and the role and scope of these services in supporting the transitions of vulnerable young people into learning and work in an environment where universal careers provision has been substantially diminished.

4 September 2017 in International Journal of Inclusive Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDeborah Robinson
Deborah Robinson
CGChris Goodey
Chris Goodey


22 October 2021 in British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJill Hanson
Jill Hanson
DRDeborah Robinson
Deborah Robinson
GCGeraldene Codina
Geraldene Codina

30 January 2024 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGeraldene Codina
Geraldene Codina
DRDeborah Robinson
Deborah Robinson
In 2022, the authors of this paper were awarded with three years’ government funding to support seventy-five English schools and Further Education colleges with the running of their own Action Research for inclusion and special educational needs projects (ISEND). Based on the funder’s interest in the identification and scaling-up of the evidence-base for SEND practice, this reflective account analyzes the evidence-base drawn upon and created by the Action Researchers for ISEND and the efficacy of the approach. Adopting an interpretivist, qualitative approach to content analysis, this paper analyzes data from the first seven completed Action Research for ISEND projects. Aligned with Dewey’s scientific model of reflection, analysis shows the Action Researchers for ISEND draw upon a complex synthesis of contextualized understanding, broadened horizons (including collaborative working and study), deepened and/or reshaped understandings, and data analysis to form their theorizations of praxis. Bearing no relation to evidence-based practice, the Action Researchers for ISEND adopt a constructivist ontology towards the inclusion of children with SEND, which challenges positivistic paradigms of “what works” in SEND and embeds a praxis of democracy which frequently includes the voices of learners with disabilities in decision making processes.