Rainfall–runoff modeling has been of great importance for flood control and water resource management. However, the selection of hydrological models is challenging to obtain superior simulation performance especially with the rapid development of machine learning techniques. Three models under different categories of machine learning methods, including support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and the long-short term memory neural network (LSTM), were assessed for simulating daily runoff over a mountainous river catchment. The performances with different input scenarios were compared. Additionally, the joint multifractal spectra (JMS) method was implemented to evaluate the simulation performances during wet and dry seasons. The results show that: (1) LSTM always obtained a higher accuracy than XGBoost and SVR; (2) the impacts of the input variables were different for different machine learning methods, such as antecedent streamflow for XGBoost and rainfall for LSTM; (3) XGBoost showed a relatively high performance during dry seasons, and the classification of wet and dry seasons improved the simulation performance, especially for LSTM during dry seasons; (4) the JMS analysis indicated the advantages of a hybrid model combined with LSTM trained with wet-season data and XGBoost trained with dry-season data.

Many hydrological models incorporate vegetation-related parameters to describe hydrological processes more precisely. These parameters should adjust dynamically in response to seasonal changes in vegetation. However, due to limited information or methodological constraints, vegetation-related parameters in hydrological models are often treated as fixed values, which restricts model performance and hinders the accurate representation of hydrological responses to vegetation changes. To address this issue, a vegetation-related dynamic-parameter framework is applied on the Xinanjiang (XAJ) model, which is noted as Eco-XAJ. The dynamic-parameter framework establishes the regression between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the evapotranspiration parameter K. Two routing methods are used in the models, i.e., the unit hydrograph (XAJ-UH and Eco-XAJ-UH) and the Linear Reservoir (XAJ-LR and Eco-XAJ-LR). The original XAJ model and the modified Eco-XAJ model are applied to the Ou River Basin, with detailed comparisons and analyses conducted under various scenarios. The results indicate that the Eco-XAJ model outperforms the original model in long-term discharge simulations, with the NSE increasing from 0.635 of XAJ-UH to 0.647 of Eco-XAJ-UH. The Eco-XAJ model also reduces overestimation and incorrect peak flow simulations during dry seasons, especially in the year 1991. In drought events, the modified model significantly enhances water balance performance. The Eco-XAJ-UH outperforms the XAJ-UH in 9 out of 16 drought events, while the Eco-XAJ-LR outperforms the XAJ-LR in 14 out of 16 drought events. The results demonstrate that the dynamic-parameter model, in regard to vegetation changes, offers more accurate simulations of hydrological processes across different scenarios, and its parameters have reasonable physical interpretations.

In the context of increasingly severe climate change, studying the relationship between climate factors and vegetation dynamics is crucial for ecological conservation and sustainable development. This study focuses on the Oujiang River Basin from 1981 to 2022, aiming to quantitatively model the interactions among temperature, precipitation, the NDVI, and the LAI. Addressing the lack of approaches for forecasting high-resolution LAI data and existing LAI data that are usually interpreted from NDVI data, we proposed a two-step inversion framework: first, modeling the response of the NDVI to climate variables; second, predicting the LAI using the NDVI as a mediating variable. By integrating long-term remote sensing datasets (GIMMS and MODIS NDVI) with meteorological data and applying trend analysis, spatial correlation analysis, and clustering techniques (K-Means and Possibilistic C-Means), we identified spatial heterogeneity in vegetation response patterns. The study results showed that (1) climate factors have a distinctly spatially heterogeneous impact on the NDVI and LAI; (2) temperature is identified as the dominant factor in most regions; and (3) the LAI prediction model based on the climate factors NDVI and NDVI–LAI relationships shows good accuracy in the medium-to-high range of the LAI, with an R² value ranging from 0.516 to 0.824. This study provides a scalable approach to improve LAI estimation and monitor vegetation dynamics in complex terrain under changing climate conditions.

The investigation of methods to evaluate the performance of hydrological models has never stopped. This study explores an innovative application, called joint multifractal spectra (JMS) analysis. The JMS analysis, which is demonstrated in three typical basins in Zhejiang Province, China, analyses both flood and low-flow periods. JMS is applied to seasonal-decomposed observed and simulated runoff series, thus helping to analyse the rising and the recession processes of discharge, which are unique features of a hydrograph. This is achieved by using q exponents to magnify or shrink the relative magnitudes of different parts. The joint multifractal spectra revealed many details of modelling, like the evaluation of recession process modelling. Given its versatility, the JMS analysis has great potential for its applications in hydrological modelling.