ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA

Dr. ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2017 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEvelyn Shaw
Evelyn Shaw
ARAlexander Rombauts
Alexander Rombauts
FTFe Tubau
Fe Tubau
APARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
JCJordi Càmara
Jordi Càmara
JCJordi Carratala
Jordi Carratala

1 September 2017 in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNúria Lloberas
Núria Lloberas
LELaure Elens
Laure Elens
ILInes Llaudó
Ines Llaudó
APARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
TGTeun van Gelder
Teun van Gelder
JGJosep M. Grinyó
Josep M. Grinyó
Introduction Tacrolimus (Tac) has a narrow therapeutic window and shows large between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. As a result, over-immunosuppression and under-immunosuppression are frequently encountered in daily clinical practice. Unraveling the impact of genetic polymorphisms on Tac pharmacokinetics may help to refine therapy. In this study, the associations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP3A) with Tac pharmacokinetics were investigated in renal transplant recipients. Participants and methods In a cohort of 272 kidney transplant recipients, associations between functional genetic variants (CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) and dose-adjusted predose Tac concentrations (C0) and daily doses of Tac at days 5–7 and 15 and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after renal transplantation were evaluated. Patients were genotyped and clustered according to both CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 allelic status: poor (PM) (CYP3A4*22 carriers with CYP3A5*3/*3), intermediate (IM) (CYP3A4*1/*1 with CYP3A5*3/*3 or CYP3A4*22 carriers with CYP3A5*1 carriers) and extensive CYP3A-metabolizers (EM) (CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1 carriers). Results EM had an 88% lower dose-adjusted C0 compared with IM. PM had a 26% higher dose-adjusted C0 compared with IM. The percentage of patients with supratherapeutic Tac exposure (C0>15 ng/ml) was significantly higher in PM (43.5%) compared with EM (0%) at days 5–7 after transplantation (P=0.01). About 30% of EM had subtherapeutic exposure (C0<5 ng/ml) at days 5–7 after transplantation (P=0.001). Conclusion The combined CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotype of renal transplant recipients has a major influence on the Tac dose required to reach the target exposure.

1 April 2016 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
HCH. Colom
H. Colom
OBO. Bestard
O. Bestard
EMEdoardo Melilli
Edoardo Melilli
NSNúria Sabé
Núria Sabé
NLNúria Lloberas
Núria Lloberas
Treatment of solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients with ganciclovir (GCV)-valganciclovir (VGCV) according to the manufacturer's recommendations may result in over- or underexposure. Bayesian prediction based on a population pharmacokinetics model may optimize GCV-VGCV dosing, achieving the area under the curve (AUC) therapeutic target. We conducted a two-arm, randomized, open-label, 40% superiority trial in adult SOT patients receiving GCV-VGCV as prophylaxis or treatment of cytomegalovirus infection. Group A was treated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For group B, the dosing was adjusted based on target exposures using a Bayesian prediction model (NONMEM). Fifty-three patients were recruited (27 in group A and 26 in group B). About 88.6% of patients in group B and 22.2% in group A reached target AUC, achieving the 40% superiority margin ( P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] difference, 47 to 86%). The time to reach target AUC was significantly longer in group A than in group B (55.9 ± 8.2 versus 15.8 ± 2.3 days, P < 0.001). A shorter time to viral clearance was observed in group B than in group A (12.5 versus 17.6 days; P = 0.125). The incidences of relapse (group A, 66.67%, and group B, 9.01%) and late-onset infection (group A, 36.7%, and group B, 7.7%) were higher in group A. Neutropenia and anemia were related to GCV overexposure. GCV-VCGV dose adjustment based on a population pharmacokinetics Bayesian prediction model optimizes GCV-VGCV exposure. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01446445.)

16 April 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura Soldevila-BoixaderLaura Soldevila-Boixader
Laura Soldevila-Boixader
BVBernat Villanueva
Bernat Villanueva
MUMarat Ulldemolins
Marat Ulldemolins
EBEva Benavent
Eva Benavent
APARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
Óscar MurilloÓscar Murillo
Óscar Murillo
Background: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DEP) is a rare but severe adverse effect and the risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for DEP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the Bone and Joint Infection Unit of the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge (January 2014–December 2018). To identify risk factors for DEP, cases were divided into two groups: those who developed DEP and those without DEP. Results: Among the whole cohort (n = 229) we identified 11 DEP cases (4.8%) and this percentage almost doubled in the subgroup of patients ≥70 years (8.1%). The risk factors for DEP were age ≥70 years (HR 10.19, 95%CI 1.28–80.93), therapy >14 days (7.71, 1.98–30.09) and total cumulative dose of daptomycin ≥10 g (5.30, 1.14–24.66). Conclusions: Clinicians should monitor cumulative daptomycin dosage to minimize DEP risk, and be cautious particularly in older patients when the total dose of daptomycin exceeds 10 g.

8 January 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEva Benavent
Eva Benavent
LMLaura Morata
Laura Morata
FEFrancesc Escrihuela-Vidal
Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal
ESEsteban Reynaga Sosa
Esteban Reynaga Sosa
Laura Soldevila-BoixaderLaura Soldevila-Boixader
Laura Soldevila-Boixader
Óscar MurilloÓscar Murillo
Óscar Murillo
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017–March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51; 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%); where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47; S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%); median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15–44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079; and 240 × 109/L to 239 × 109/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%; among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.

1 March 2012 in Clinical Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
ARIADNA PADULLES-ZAMORA
HCH. Colom
H. Colom
YAY. Armendariz
Y. Armendariz
GCG. Cerezo
G. Cerezo
ACA. Caldes
A. Caldes
NLN. Lloberas
N. Lloberas