Charles Fox

Dr. Charles Fox

School of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2011 in Artificial Intelligence Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox
SRStephen J. Roberts
Stephen J. Roberts

28 July 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFanta Camara
Fanta Camara
Nicola BellottoNicola Bellotto
Nicola Bellotto
SCSerhan Cosar
Serhan Cosar
FWFlorian Weber
Florian Weber
DNDimitris Nathanael
Dimitris Nathanael
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) must share space with pedestrians, both in carriageway cases such as cars at pedestrian crossings and off-carriageway cases such as delivery vehicles navigating through crowds on pedestrianized high-streets. Unlike static obstacles, pedestrians are active agents with complex, interactive motions. Planning AV actions in the presence of pedestrians thus requires modelling of their probable future behavior as well as detecting and tracking them. This narrative review article is Part II of a pair, together surveying the current technology stack involved in this process, organising recent research into a hierarchical taxonomy ranging from low-level image detection to high-level psychological models, from the perspective of an AV designer. This self-contained Part II covers the higher levels of this stack, consisting of models of pedestrian behavior, from prediction of individual pedestrians' likely destinations and paths, to game-theoretic models of interactions between pedestrians and autonomous vehicles. This survey clearly shows that, although there are good models for optimal walking behavior, high-level psychological and social modelling of pedestrian behavior still remains an open research question that requires many conceptual issues to be clarified. Early work has been done on descriptive and qualitative models of behavior, but much work is still needed to translate them into quantitative algorithms for practical AV control.

29 July 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFanta Camara
Fanta Camara
Nicola BellottoNicola Bellotto
Nicola Bellotto
SCSerhan Cosar
Serhan Cosar
DNDimitris Nathanael
Dimitris Nathanael
MAMatthias Althoff
Matthias Althoff
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) must share space with pedestrians, both in carriageway cases such as cars at pedestrian crossings and off-carriageway cases such as delivery vehicles navigating through crowds on pedestrianized high-streets. Unlike static obstacles, pedestrians are active agents with complex, interactive motions. Planning AV actions in the presence of pedestrians thus requires modelling of their probable future behavior as well as detecting and tracking them. This narrative review article is Part I of a pair, together surveying the current technology stack involved in this process, organising recent research into a hierarchical taxonomy ranging from low-level image detection to high-level psychology models, from the perspective of an AV designer. This self-contained Part I covers the lower levels of this stack, from sensing, through detection and recognition, up to tracking of pedestrians. Technologies at these levels are found to be mature and available as foundations for use in high-level systems, such as behavior modelling, prediction and interaction control.

1 August 2017 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABA. Binch
A. Binch
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox

8 May 2018 in AI & SOCIETY
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Subhajit BasuSubhajit Basu
Subhajit Basu
AOAdekemi Omotubora
Adekemi Omotubora
MBMatt Beeson
Matt Beeson
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox
Legal structures may form barriers to, or enablers of, adoption of precision agriculture management with small autonomous agricultural robots. This article develops a conceptual regulatory framework for small autonomous agricultural robots, from a practical, self-contained engineering guide perspective, sufficient to get working research and commercial agricultural roboticists quickly and easily up and running within the law. The article examines the liability framework, or rather lack of it, for agricultural robotics in EU, and their transpositions to UK law, as a case study illustrating general international legal concepts and issues. It examines how the law may provide mitigating effects on the liability regime, and how contracts can be developed between agents within it to enable smooth operation. It covers other legal aspects of operation such as the use of shared communications resources and privacy in the reuse of robot-collected data. Where there are some grey areas in current law, it argues that new proposals could be developed to reform these to promote further innovation and investment in agricultural robots.

18 March 2009 in Autonomous Robots
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Charles FoxCharles Fox
Charles Fox
BMBen Mitchinson
Ben Mitchinson
MPMartin Pearson
Martin Pearson
APAnthony G. Pipe
Anthony G. Pipe
TPTony J. Prescott
Tony J. Prescott