PURPOSE: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E cytotoxic payload. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539536 ) aimed to identify the optimal c-Met protein–overexpressing non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population for treatment with Teliso-V (stage I) and expand the selected group for efficacy evaluation (stage II). Stage II enrolled patients with nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-wildtype NSCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients had locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–overexpressing NSCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy (including ≤1 line of systemic chemotherapy). c-Met protein overexpression in nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining (high [≥50% 3+]; intermediate [≥25%–<50%]). Teliso-V was administered at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. RESULTS: In total, 172 patients with nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC received Teliso-V in stages I and II. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 21.7 to 36.2; c-Met high, 34.6% [95% CI, 24.2 to 46.2]; c-Met intermediate, 22.9% [95% CI, 14.4 to 33.4]). The median duration of response was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3; c-Met high, 9.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 13.0]; c-Met intermediate: 7.2 [95% CI, 5.3 to 11.5]). The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.9 to 16.6; c-Met high, 14.6 [95% CI, 9.2 to 25.6]; c-Met intermediate, 14.2 [95% CI, 9.6 to 16.6]). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.9; c-Met high, 5.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3]; c-Met intermediate: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1]). Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%); the most common grade ≥3 AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSION: Teliso-V was associated with durable responses in c-Met protein–overexpressing nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC, especially in those with high c-Met. AEs were generally manageable.

Antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4, administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are the standard of care in most patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers. When given before curative surgery, tumor responses and improved event-free survival are achieved. New antibody combinations may be more efficacious and tolerable. In an ongoing, open-label phase 2 study, 60 biomarker-unselected, treatment-naive patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive two preoperative doses of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) with or without relatlimab (anti-LAG-3) antibody therapy. The primary study endpoint was the feasibility of surgery within 43 days, which was met by all patients. Curative resection was achieved in 95% of patients. Secondary endpoints included pathological and radiographic response rates, pathologically complete resection rates, disease-free and overall survival rates, and safety. Major pathological (≤10% viable tumor cells) and objective radiographic responses were achieved in 27% and 10% (nivolumab) and in 30% and 27% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, respectively. In 100% (nivolumab) and 90% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, tumors and lymph nodes were pathologically completely resected. With 12 months median duration of follow-up, disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 12 months were 89% and 93% (nivolumab), and 93% and 100% (nivolumab and relatlimab). Both treatments were safe with grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in 10% and 13% of patients per study arm. Exploratory analyses provided insights into biological processes triggered by preoperative immunotherapy. This study establishes the feasibility and safety of dual targeting of PD-1 and LAG-3 before lung cancer surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Indentifier: NCT04205552.

Recent advances in our understanding of cancer immunology resulted in the development of promising therapeutic agents for either nonantigen-specific immunotherapy, for example, monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints on the T-cell lymphocyte, and antigen-specific immunotherapy or vaccination. Here, we review the recently reported results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the latter approach. Several trials indicated feasibility, safety, and potential for better patient outcomes. In resected early stage non-small-cell lung cancer, a phase II RCT with the MAGE-A3 vaccine showed a trend for improved disease-free interval (hazard ratio 0.75), now further evaluated in the large MAGRIT (MAGE-A3 as Adjuvant NSCLC Immunotherapy Trial) study. In stage III after chemoradiotherapy, the phase III START (Stimulating Targeted Antigenic Responses to NSCLC) trial with L-BLP25 vaccine resulted in a remarkable 10-month improvement in median survival in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy subgroup. In the advanced setting, the phase III study with the allogeneic tumor cell vaccine belagenpumatucel-L did not improve survival in the whole study, but interesting effects were seen in subgroups. Recent non-small-cell lung cancer vaccination trials did not meet their primary endpoint, but showed clear patient benefits in subgroup analyses. Confirmatory trials and identifying patients who will benefit using predictive factors, will hopefully bring these approaches in the clinic in the near future.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with the majority of cases diagnosed in an advanced stage. Early-stage disease non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a better outcome, nevertheless the 5-year survival rates drop from 60% for stage IIA to 36% for stage IIIA disease. Early detection and optimized perioperative systemic treatment are frontrunner strategies to reduce this burden. The rapid advancements in molecular diagnostics as well as the growing availability of targeted therapies call for the most efficient detection of actionable biomarkers. Liquid biopsies have already proven their added value in the management of advanced NSCLC but can also optimize patient care in early-stage NSCLC. In addition to having known diagnostic benefits of speed, accessibility, and enhanced biomarker detection compared to tissue biopsy, liquid biopsy could be implemented for screening, diagnostic, and prognostic purposes. Furthermore, liquid biopsy can optimize therapeutic management by overcoming the issue of tumor heterogeneity, monitoring tumor burden, and detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), i.e., the presence of tumor-specific ctDNA, post-operatively. The latter is strongly prognostic and is likely to become a guidance in the postsurgical management. In this review, we present the current evidence on the clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage lung cancer, discuss a selection of key trials, and suggest future applications.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We report the predictive utility of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) diversity and tumor mutational burden (TMB) by comprehensive next-generation sequencing. 126 patients were included. TMB high was defined as ≥ 10 nonsynonymous mutations/Mb. Patients exhibit high HLA-I diversity if at least one locus was in the upper 15th percentile for DNA alignment scores. No difference in response rate (RR; 44.4% versus 30.9%; p = 0.1741) or 6-month survival rate (SR; 75.6% versus 77.8%; p = 0.7765) was noted between HLA-I high diversity and low diversity patients. HLA-I high diversity patients did significantly more often exhibit durable clinical benefit (DCB), defined as response or stable disease lasting minimally 6 months (64.4% [29/45] versus 43.2% [35/81]; p = 0.0223). TMB high patients exhibited higher RR (49.1% versus 25.4%; p = 0.0084) and SR 6 months after start ICI (85.5% versus 70.4%; p = 0.0468) than TMB low patients. The proportion of patients with DCB, did not differ significantly between TMB high and low subgroups (60.0% [33/55] versus 42.3% [30/71]; p = 0.0755). Patients with combined dual high TMB and HLA-I diversity had higher RR (63.2% versus 22.2%; p = 0.0033), but SR at 6 months did not differ significantly (84.2% versus 64,4%; p = 0.1536). A significantly higher rate of patients experienced DCB in dual high compared to the dual low group (73.7% [14/19] versus 35.6% [16/45]; p = 0.0052). Triple positive patients (high TMB and HLA-I diversity and PD-L1 positive) had higher RR (63.6% versus 0.0%; p = 0.0047) and SR at 6 months (100% versus 66.7%; p = 0.0378) compared to triple-negative patients. HLA-I diversity was able to predict durable clinical benefit in ICI treated NSCLC patients, but failed to confirm as a predictor of response or survival. TMB confirmed as a predictive biomarker.