Osteoporosis is an unavoidable public health problem in an aging or aged society. Anti-resorptive agents (calcitonin, estrogen, and selective estrogen-receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand antibody along with calcium and vitamin D supplementations) and anabolic agents (parathyroid hormone and related peptide analogs, sclerostin inhibitors) have major roles in current treatment regimens and are used alone or in combination based on the pathological condition. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of bone metabolism and in bioengineering will open the door to future treatment paradigms for osteoporosis, including antibody agents, stem cells, and gene therapies. This review provides an overview of the molecular mechanisms, clinical evidence, and potential adverse effects of drugs that are currently used or under development for the treatment of osteoporosis to aid clinicians in deciding how to select the best treatment option.

In this era of aging societies, the number of elderly individuals who undergo spinal arthrodesis for various degenerative diseases is increasing. Poor bone quality and osteogenic ability in older patients, due to osteoporosis, often interfere with achieving bone fusion after spinal arthrodesis. Enhancement of bone fusion requires shifting bone homeostasis toward increased bone formation and reduced resorption. Several biological enhancement strategies of bone formation have been conducted in animal models of spinal arthrodesis and human clinical trials. Pharmacological agents for osteoporosis have also been shown to be effective in enhancing bone fusion. Cytokines, which activate bone formation, such as bone morphogenetic proteins, have already been clinically used to enhance bone fusion for spinal arthrodesis. Recently, stem cells have attracted considerable attention as a cell source of osteoblasts, promising effects in enhancing bone fusion. Drug delivery systems will also need to be further developed to assure the safe delivery of bone-enhancing agents to the site of spinal arthrodesis. Our aim in this review is to appraise the current state of knowledge and evidence regarding bone enhancement strategies for spinal fusion for degenerative spinal disorders, and to identify future directions for biological bone enhancement strategies, including pharmacological, cell and gene therapy approaches.

Recent evidence suggests an association between age‐related osteoporosis and cellular senescence in the bone; however, the specific bone cells that play a critical role in age‐related osteoporosis and the mechanism remain unknown. Results revealed that age‐related osteoporosis is characterized by the loss of osteoblast Men1. Osteoblast‐specific inducible knockout of Men1 caused structural changes in the mice bones, matching the phenotypes in patients with age‐related osteoporosis. Histomorphometrically, Men1‐knockout mice femurs decreased osteoblastic activity and increased osteoclastic activity, hallmarks of age‐related osteoporosis. Loss of Men1 induces cellular senescence via mTORC1 activation and AMPK suppression, rescued by metformin treatment. In bone morphogenetic protein‐indued bone model, loss of Men1 leads to accumulation of senescent cells and osteoporotic bone formation, which are ameliorated by metformin. Our results indicate that cellular senescence in osteoblasts plays a critical role in age‐related osteoporosis and that osteoblast‐specific inducible Men1‐knockout mice offer a promising model for developing therapeutics for age‐related osteoporosis.

Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) is clinically applied for treating intractable fractures and promoting spinal fusion because of its osteogenic potency. However, adverse effects following the release of supraphysiological doses of BMP2 from collagen carriers are widely reported. Nanoclay gel (NC) is attracting attention as a biomaterial, given the potential for localized efficacy of administered agents. However, the efficacy and mechanism of action of NC/BMP2 remain unclear. This study explored the efficacy of NC as a BMP2 carrier in bone regeneration and the enhancement mechanism. Subfascial implantation of NC containing BMP2 elicited superior bone formation compared with collagen sponge (CS). Cartilage was uniformly formed inside the NC, whereas CS formed cartilage only on the perimeter. Additionally, CS induced a dose-dependent inflammatory response around the implantation site, whereas NC induced a minor response, and inflammatory cells were observed inside the NC. In a rat spinal fusion model, NC promoted high-quality bony fusion compared to CS. In vitro, NC enhanced chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs and ATDC5 cells while inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Overall, NC/BMP2 facilitates spatially controlled, high-quality endochondral bone formation without BMP2-induced inflammation and promotes high-density new bone, functioning as a next-generation BMP2 carrier.