Iris D. Nagtegaal

Dr. Iris D. Nagtegaal


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 August 2019 in Histopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
INIris D. Nagtegaal
Iris D. Nagtegaal
RORobert D. Odze
Robert D. Odze
DKDavid Klimstra
David Klimstra
VPValerie Paradis
Valerie Paradis
MRMassimo Rugge
Massimo Rugge
TBthe WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
the WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
The WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours presented in the first volume of the WHO Classification of Tumours series' fifth edition reflects important advancements in our understanding of tumours of the digestive system (table 1). For the first time, certain tumour types are defined as much by their molecular phenotype as their histological characteristics; however, histopathological classification remains the gold standard for diagnosis in most instances. The WHO Classification of Tumours series is designed to be used worldwide, including those settings where a lack of tissue samples or of specific technical facilities limits the pathologist's ability to rely on molecular testing.

30 August 2001 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ellen KapiteijnEllen Kapiteijn
Ellen Kapiteijn
CMC A Marijnen
C A Marijnen
INIris D. Nagtegaal
Iris D. Nagtegaal
HPH Putter
H Putter
WSW H Steup
W H Steup
DGDutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Short-term preoperative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision have each been shown to improve local control of disease in patients with resectable rectal cancer. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether the addition of preoperative radiotherapy increases the benefit of total mesorectal excision. We randomly assigned 1861 patients with resectable rectal cancer either to preoperative radiotherapy (5 Gy on each of five days) followed by total mesorectal excision (924 patients) or to total mesorectal excision alone (937 patients). The trial was conducted with the use of standardization and quality-control measures to ensure the consistency of the radiotherapy, surgery, and pathological techniques. Of the 1861 patients randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups, 1805 were eligible to participate. The overall rate of survival at two years among the eligible patients was 82.0 percent in the group assigned to both radiotherapy and surgery and 81.8 percent in the group assigned to surgery alone (P=0.84). Among the 1748 patients who underwent a macroscopically complete local resection, the rate of local recurrence at two years was 5.3 percent. The rate of local recurrence at two years was 2.4 percent in the radiotherapy-plus-surgery group and 8.2 percent in the surgery-only group (P<0.001). Short-term preoperative radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer who undergo a standardized total mesorectal excision.

1 May 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFranck Pagès
Franck Pagès
BMBernhard Mlecnik
Bernhard Mlecnik
FMFlorence Marliot
Florence Marliot
GBGabriela Bindea
Gabriela Bindea
FOFang-Shu Ou
Fang-Shu Ou
JGJerome Galon
Jerome Galon

1 June 2011 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WGWillem Van Gijn
Willem Van Gijn
CMCorrie A M Marijnen
Corrie A M Marijnen
INIris D. Nagtegaal
Iris D. Nagtegaal
EMElma Meershoek
Elma Meershoek
HPHein Putter
Hein Putter
DGDutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

1 October 2012 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hans Joachim SchmollHans Joachim Schmoll
Hans Joachim Schmoll
ECE. Van Cutsem
E. Van Cutsem
ASA. Stein
A. Stein
VVVincenzo Valentini
Vincenzo Valentini
BGB. Glimelius
B. Glimelius
Andres CervantesAndres Cervantes
Andres Cervantes
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common tumour type in both sexes combined in Western countries. Although screening programmes including the implementation of faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy might be able to reduce mortality by removing precursor lesions and by making diagnosis at an earlier stage, the burden of disease and mortality is still high. Improvement of diagnostic and treatment options increased staging accuracy, functional outcome for early stages as well as survival. Although high quality surgery is still the mainstay of curative treatment, the management of CRC must be a multi-modal approach performed by an experienced multi-disciplinary expert team. Optimal choice of the individual treatment modality according to disease localization and extent, tumour biology and patient factors is able to maintain quality of life, enables long-term survival and even cure in selected patients by a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence, which has been the basis for this consensus conference-based guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of rectal and colon cancer and the individual clinical situations. This ESMO guideline is recommended to be used as the basis for treatment and management decisions.

3 October 2013 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJerome Galon
Jerome Galon
BMBernhard Mlecnik
Bernhard Mlecnik
GBGabriela Bindea
Gabriela Bindea
HAHelen K Angell
Helen K Angell
ABAnne Berger
Anne Berger
FPFranck Pagès
Franck Pagès
The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system provides the most reliable guidelines for the routine prognostication and treatment of colorectal carcinoma. This traditional tumour staging summarizes data on tumour burden (T), the presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for distant metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that the clinical outcome can vary significantly among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information and does not predict response to therapy. Multiple ways to classify cancer and to distinguish different subtypes of colorectal cancer have been proposed, including morphology, cell origin, molecular pathways, mutation status and gene expression‐based stratification. These parameters rely on tumour‐cell characteristics. Extensive literature has investigated the host immune response against cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the in situ immune cell infiltrate in tumours. A methodology named ‘Immunoscore’ has been defined to quantify the in situ immune infiltrate. In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC/UICC TNM classification. An international consortium has been initiated to validate and promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings. The results of this international consortium may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM‐I (TNM‐Immune). © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.