Background: Scan-related anxiety (“scanxiety”) is distressing to people living with and beyond cancer. We conducted a scoping review to promote conceptual clarity, identify research practices and gaps, and guide intervention strategies for adults with a current or prior cancer diagnosis. Methods: Following a systematic search, we screened 6820 titles and abstracts, evaluated 152 full-text articles, and selected 36 articles. Definitions, study designs, measurement methods, correlates, and consequences of scanxiety were extracted and summarized. Results: The reviewed articles included individuals living with current cancer (n = 17) and those in the post-treatment phase (n = 19), across a breadth of cancer types and disease stages. In five articles, authors explicitly defined scanxiety. Multiple components of scanxiety were described, including those related to scan procedures (e.g., claustrophobia, physical discomfort) and scan results (e.g., implications for disease status and treatment), suggesting varied intervention approaches may be needed. Twenty-two articles used quantitative methods, nine used qualitative methods, and five used mixed methods. In 17 articles, symptom measures specifically referenced cancer scans; 24 included general measures without reference to scans. Scanxiety tended to be higher among those with lower education levels, less time since diagnosis, and greater baseline anxiety levels (three articles each). Although scanxiety often decreased immediately pre- to post-scan (six articles), participants reported the waiting period between scan and results to be particularly stressful (six articles). Consequences of scanxiety included poorer quality of life and somatic symptoms. Scanxiety promoted follow-up care for some patients yet hindered it for others. Conclusions: Scanxiety is multi-faceted, heightened during the pre-scan and scan-to-results waiting periods, and associated with clinically meaningful outcomes. We discuss how these findings can inform future research directions and intervention approaches.

Objective: People living with HIV (PLWH) frequently experience pain, which often co-occurs with psychological symptoms and may impact functional outcomes. We investigated cross-sectional associations between pain, depressive symptoms, and inflammation, and then explored whether pain was related to poorer physical function among older PLWH. Methods: We examined data from PLWH aged 54 to 78 years ( n = 162) recruited from a single outpatient program for a larger study on HIV and aging. Participants reported depressive symptoms (10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) and then attended a biomedical visit in which they reported past-month pain (Medical Outcomes Study-HIV pain subscale), completed physical function assessments, and provided blood samples (assayed for interleukin 6, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor α, and C-reactive protein). Links between pain, depressive symptoms, inflammation, and physical function were tested using linear regression models. Results: PLWH with greater depressive symptoms experienced more pain than did those with fewer depressive symptoms ( B = 1.31, SE = 0.28, p < .001), adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking, disease burden, time since HIV diagnosis, and medication use. Higher composite cytokine levels were associated with worse pain ( B = 5.70, SE = 2.54, p = .027 in adjusted model). Poorer physical function indicators, including slower gait speed, weaker grip strength, recent falls, and prefrail or frail status, were observed among those with worse pain. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that pain may partially explain links between depressive symptoms and several physical function outcomes. Conclusions: Pain is a potential pathway linking depressive symptoms and inflammation to age-related health vulnerabilities among older PLWH; longitudinal investigation of this pattern is warranted. PLWH presenting with pain may benefit from multidisciplinary resources, including behavioral health and geriatric medicine approaches.

Routine cancer scans (eg, CT, MRI) produce important prognostic information. However, patients may experience distressing "scanxiety" around the time of scans and scan result discussions. The aim of this study was to describe scanxiety and factors affecting it among patients with metastatic lung cancer completing disease-monitoring, postdiagnosis scans. After a clinical appointment to discuss routine disease-monitoring scans, participants with metastatic lung cancer who were receiving first-line treatment (n = 9) completed semistructured interviews. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Qualitative analysis revealed that some patients experienced anxiety and other negative emotions around their scans, whereas others did not; patients self-managed anxiety using diverse coping strategies and by seeking out support. Participants described clinician- and clinic-based factors influencing scanxiety, including scheduling and procedural logistics, knowing what to expect, rapport with clinicians, and results delivery methods. Despite the small sample, these findings suggest some, but not all, patients with metastatic lung cancer may benefit from psychosocial support while awaiting scan results and provide insight into patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level factors that may be targeted to reduce scanxiety.