Gerti Pishtari

Dr. Gerti Pishtari

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2020 in British Journal of Educational Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari
MTMaría Jesús Rodríguez Triana
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana
ESEdna M. Sarmiento‐Márquez
Edna M. Sarmiento‐Márquez
MPMar Pérez‐Sanagustín
Mar Pérez‐Sanagustín
ARAdolfo Ruiz‐Calleja
Adolfo Ruiz‐Calleja
Terje VäljatagaTerje Väljataga
Terje Väljataga

28 January 2023 in Educational Research Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
EDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari
LPLuis P. Prieto
Luis P. Prieto
KPKatrin Poom-Valickis
Katrin Poom-Valickis

29 June 2023 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley
KTKairit Tammets
Kairit Tammets
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari
PCPankaj Chejara
Pankaj Chejara
RKReet Kasepalu
Reet Kasepalu
BWBarbara Wasson
Barbara Wasson
Background: With increased use of artificial intelligence in the classroom, there is now a need to better understand the complementarity of intelligent learning technology and teachers to produce effective instruction.Objective: The paper reviews the current research on intelligent learning technology designed to make models of student learning and instruction transparent to teachers, an area we call model‐based learning analytics. We intended to gain an insight into the coupling between the knowledge models that underpin the intelligent system and the knowledge used by teachers in their classroom decision making.Methods: Using a systematic literature review methodology, we first identified 42 papers, mainly from the domain of intelligent tutoring systems and learning analytics dashboards that conformed to our selection criteria. We then qualitatively analysed the context in which the systems were applied, models they used and benefits reported for teachers and learners.Results and Conclusions: A majority of papers used either domain or learner models, suggesting that instructional decisions are mostly left to teachers. Compared to previous reviews, our set of papers appeared to have a stronger focus on providing teachers with theory‐driven insights and instructional decisions. This suggests that model‐based learning analytics can address some of the shortcomings of the field, like meaningfulness and actionability of learning analytics tools. However, impact in the classroom still needs further research, as in half of the cases the reported benefits were not backed with evidence. Future research should focus on the dynamic interaction between teachers and technology and how learning analytics has an impact on learning and decision making by teachers and students. We offer a taxonomy of knowledge models that can serve as a starting point for designing such interaction.

23 August 2024 in Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDe Silva
De Silva
LHLiyanachchi Mahesha Harshani
Liyanachchi Mahesha Harshani
MTMaría Jesús Rodríguez Triana
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana
MJMaría Jesús
María Jesús
ICIrene-Angelica Chounta
Irene-Angelica Chounta
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari

28 August 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari
EMEDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
EDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
MTMaría Jesús Rodríguez Triana
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana
MWMarlene Wagner
Marlene Wagner
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley

18 March 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
GPGerti Pishtari
Gerti Pishtari
EMEDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
EDNA MILENA SARMIENTO MARQUEZ
MTMaría Jesús Rodríguez Triana
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana
MWMarlene Wagner
Marlene Wagner
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley
Given the rising prominence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education, understanding its impact on teacher practices is essential. This paper presents an ABAB reversal design study conducted during a teacher training, where an AI-driven feedback system helped 19 teachers to create learning designs. It investigates the impact that the AI-driven feedback had on the quality of designs and assesses pre- and post-training shifts in teachers’ perceptions of the technology. We observed statistical differences between designs crafted without (in phase A1) and with AI (B1). Notably, a small positive influence persisted even after AI withdrawal (A2). This hints that specialized AI algorithms for learning design can assist teachers in effectively achieving their design objectives. Despite noticeable shifts in teachers’ perceived understanding and usefulness of AI, their trust and intention to use remained unchanged. For a successful teacher-AI partnership, future research should explore the long-term impact that AI usage can have on learning design practices and strategies to nurture trust.