Leonardo Meomartino

Prof. Leonardo Meomartino

Interdepartmental Veterinary Radiology Centre, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2022 in European Journal of Radiology Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AGAdelaide Greco
Adelaide Greco
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
GGGiacomo Gnudi
Giacomo Gnudi
ABArturo Brunetti
Arturo Brunetti
MGMauro Di Giancamillo
Mauro Di Giancamillo
Radiography and ultrasonography are the most used techniques in veterinary clinical practice, due to organizational, managerial and, mostly, economic reasons. However, in the last decades, Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and, to a lesser extent, Nuclear Medicine (MN) are increasingly used. As we said in the previous article, all the Diagnostic Imaging techniques are actually “indispensable” in Veterinary Medicine, where many patients do not show any symptoms.This second part describes Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance (MRI) and Nuclear Medicine techniques in Veterinary Medicine are described.

28 August 2008 in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAdelaide Greco
Adelaide Greco
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
VRVera Raiano
Vera Raiano
GERARDO FATONEGERARDO FATONE
GERARDO FATONE
ABArturo Brunetti
Arturo Brunetti

18 October 2021 in European Journal of Radiology Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
AGAdelaide Greco
Adelaide Greco
MGMauro Di Giancamillo
Mauro Di Giancamillo
ABArturo Brunetti
Arturo Brunetti
GGGiacomo Gnudi
Giacomo Gnudi
In Veterinary Medicine all the Imaging techniques are used and described but, due to organizational, managerial and, mostly, economical reasons, Radiography and Ultrasonography are the most used.

1 January 2002 in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMarco Russo
Marco Russo
ECEucenio M. Covelli
Eucenio M. Covelli
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
CLChristopher R. Lamb
Christopher R. Lamb
ABArturo Brunetti
Arturo Brunetti

1 January 1999 in Journal of Small Animal Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
GERARDO FATONEGERARDO FATONE
GERARDO FATONE
ABArturo Brunetti
Arturo Brunetti
FLF. Lamagna
F. Lamagna
APA. Potena
A. Potena

26 May 2015 in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VTVlad Tipisca
Vlad Tipisca
CMCarla Murino
Carla Murino
LCLaura Cortese
Laura Cortese
GMGiuseppina Mennonna
Giuseppina Mennonna
Luigi AulettaLuigi Auletta
Luigi Auletta
LMLeonardo Meomartino
Leonardo Meomartino
Objectives: The objectives were to determine the resistive index (RI) in normal cats and in cats with various renal diseases, and to evaluate the effect of age on RI. Methods: The subjects were cats that had ultrasonography (US) of the urinary tract and RI measurement at our centre between January 2003 and April 2014. Based on clinical evaluation, biochemical and haematological tests, urinalysis and US, the cats were classified as healthy or diseased. RI measurements were made from the interlobar or arcuate arteries. Data were analysed for differences between the right and the left kidney, the two sexes, different age groups in healthy cats, and between healthy and diseased cats. Results: A total of 116 cats (68 males, 48 females) were included: 24 healthy and 92 diseased. In the healthy cats, RI (mean ± SD) differed significantly ( P = 0.02) between the right kidney (0.54 ± 0.07) and the left kidney (0.59 ± 0.08). For the left kidney, RI was significantly higher in cats with chronic kidney disease (0.73 ± 0.12) and acute kidney injury (0.72 ± 0.08) ( P = 0.0008). For the right kidney, RI was significantly higher in cats with chronic kidney disease (0.72 ± 0.11), acute kidney injury (0.74 ± 0.08), polycystic kidney disease (0.77 ± 0.11) and renal tumour (0.74 ± 0.001) ( P <0.0001). There was no significant effect on RI value in either kidney in terms of age or sex. Conclusions and relevance: RI could be considered a valuable diagnostic tool in cats, useful in the differential diagnosis of diffuse renal diseases. While it does not change with the age of the cat, ultrasonographers should be aware that RI may differ between the two kidneys.