Extracellular matrices (ECMs) are dynamic 3D macromolecular networks that exhibit structural characteristics and composition specific to different tissues, serving various biomechanical and regulatory functions. The interactions between ECM macromolecules such as collagen, elastin, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), proteoglycans (PGs), fibronectin, and laminin, along with matrix effectors and water, contribute to the unique cellular and tissue functional properties during organ development, tissue homoeostasis, remodeling, disease development, and progression. Cells adapt to environmental changes by adjusting the composition and array of ECM components. ECMs, forming the 3D bioscaffolds of our body, provide mechanical support for tissues and organs and respond to the environmental variables influencing growth and final adult body shape in mammals. Different cell types display distinct adaptations to the respective ECM environments. ECMs regulate biological processes by controlling the diffusion of infections and inflammations, sensing and adapting to external stimuli and gravity from the surrounding habitat, and, in the context of cancer, interplaying with and regulating cancer cell invasion and drug resistance. Alterations in the ECM composition in pathological conditions drive adaptive responses of cells and could therefore result in abnormal cell behavior and tissue dysfunction. Understanding the biomechanical functionality, adaptation, and roles of distinct ECMs is essential for research on various pathologies, including cancer progression and multidrug resistance, which is of crucial importance for developing targeted therapies. In this Viewpoint article, we critically present and discuss specific biomechanical functions of ECMs and regulatory adaptation mechanisms in both health and disease, with a particular focus on cancer progression.

The incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC), constituting approximately one in ten cancer cases worldwide, affects approximately 644,000 individuals annually. Managing this complex disease involves various treatment modalities such as systemic therapy, radiation, and surgery, particularly for patients with locally advanced disease. HNC treatment necessitates a multidisciplinary approach due to alterations in patients’ genomes affecting their functionality. Predominantly, squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), the majority of HNCs, arise from the upper aerodigestive tract epithelium. The epidemiology, staging, diagnosis, and management techniques of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), encompassing clinical, image-based, histopathological and molecular profiling, have been extensively reviewed. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a well-known predictive factor for HNSCC that initiates metastasis and significantly impacts HNSCC prognosis. Distant metastasis (DM) in HNSCC has been correlated to aberrant expression of cancer cell-derived cytokines and growth factors triggering abnormal activation of several signaling pathways that boost cancer cell aggressiveness. Recent advances in genetic profiling, understanding tumor microenvironment, oligometastatic disease, and immunotherapy have revolutionized treatment strategies and disease control. Future research may leverage genomics and proteomics to identify biomarkers aiding individualized HNSCC treatment. Understanding the molecular basis, genetic landscape, atypical signaling pathways, and tumor microenvironment have enhanced the comprehension of HNSCC molecular etiology. This critical review sheds light on regional and distant metastases in HNSCC, presenting major clinical and laboratory features, predictive biomarkers, and available therapeutic approaches.

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) constitute a wide range of malignancies originating from the epithelial lining of the upper aerodigestive tract, including the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and salivary glands. Although lymphomas affecting this region are not conventionally classified as HNCs, they may occur in lymph nodes or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues within the head and neck. Oncogenic viruses play a crucial role in HNC onset. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is extensively studied for its association with oropharyngeal cancers; nevertheless, other oncogenic viruses also contribute to HNC development. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and advancements in detection methods of oncogenic viruses associated with HNCs, recognizing HPV’s well-established role while exploring additional viral connections. Notably, Epstein–Barr virus is linked to nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphomas. Human herpesvirus 8 is implicated in Kaposi’s sarcoma, and Merkel cell polyomavirus is associated with subsets of HNCs. Additionally, hepatitis viruses are examined for their potential association with HNCs. Understanding the viral contributions in the head and neck area is critical for refining therapeutic approaches. This review underlines the interaction between viruses and malignancies in this region, highlighting the necessity for ongoing research to elucidate additional mechanisms and enhance clinical outcomes.

Exosomes are nanosized vesicles that are produced in normal and cancer cells, promoting intracellular communication. In head and neck cancer (HNC), exosomes are involved in many undesirable events of cancer development and progression, including angiogenesis, tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling, invasion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), metastasis, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and drug resistance. Exosomes are involved in altering the signaling pathways in recipient cells by the cargoes they carry. Proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids such as DNA fragments and RNAs (i.e., mRNAs, miRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs) are carried in the exosomes to promote cell communication. EMT is a critical cellular process in which epithelial cells are forced to become mesenchymal cells by the actions of SNAIL/SLUG, TWIST, and ZEB family transcription factors carried in exosomes that facilitate metastasis. In this critical review, we focused on exosome biogenesis, their cargoes, and their involvement in EMT induction and metastasis during HNC. Insights into exosome isolation and characterization, as well as their key role in ECM remodeling and degradation, are also presented and critically discussed. More importantly, this article addresses the role of exosomes in HNC and drug resistance induced in drug-sensitive cancer cells. In addition, exosomes have a great potential to be used as diagnostic and therapeutic tools. A better understanding on exosome biogenesis, composition, and functions in HNC will aid in developing novel therapeutic strategies to treat HNC, overcome therapy resistance, and avoid metastasis, which is a significant cause of cancer death.

This preliminary nonrandomized study was conducted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of TATI and CYFRA 21–1 as tumor markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Serum levels of these markers were measured from 122 subjects of a tertiary-care university hospital, divided into four groups: (1) normal individuals and patients with (2) inflammatory pathology, (3) benign tumors and (4) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Serum samples were collected before and after treatment, with a mean follow-up period of 12 months. The cutoff level, sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio of a positive and negative test were: 21 µg/l, 66.6%, 93.75%, 10.6 and 0.35 for TATI; 3.3 µg/l,28.5%, 95%, 5.7 and 0.75 for CYFRA 21–1, respectively. Both markers presented elevated mean values and statistically significant differences in the cancer patient group compared with the other groups. Significant differences were also observed between the stage of disease and tumor differentiation. TATI levels seem to relate positively to the course of disease during the follow-up period. Although CYFRA 21–1 values presented significant differences, the majority of them were under the cutoff level. We conclude that TATI seems to play a role in the clinical evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, while the usefulness of CYFRA 21–1 is limited.