The emergence of novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) in 2019 in China marked the third outbreak of a highly pathogenic coronavirus infecting humans. The novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) spread worldwide, becoming an emergency of major international concern. However, even after a decade of coronavirus research, there are still no licensed vaccines or therapeutic agents to treat the coronavirus infection. In this context, apitherapy presents as a promising source of pharmacological and nutraceutical agents for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of COVID‐19. For instance, several honeybee products, such as honey, pollen, propolis, royal jelly, beeswax, and bee venom, have shown potent antiviral activity against pathogens that cause severe respiratory syndromes, including those caused by human coronaviruses. In addition, the benefits of these natural products to the immune system are remarkable, and many of them are involved in the induction of antibody production, maturation of immune cells, and stimulation of the innate and adaptive immune responses. Thus, in the absence of specific antivirals against SARS‐CoV‐2, apitherapy could offer one hope toward mitigating some of the risks associated with COVID‐19.

The medical importance of intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) contrasts with the limited number of pharmacological treatment options available and the increasing rate of resistance to antifungal drugs. Thus, the repositioning of compounds in clinical use can contribute to the broadening of treatment possibilities for this infection. Statins, a class of drugs used to reduce cardiovascular event risk, have shown antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antiviral activities; however, their antifungal effects remain poorly studied. In this context, the present study aimed to elucidate the antifungal potential of six statins in vitro, as well as to evaluate the therapeutic use of fluvastatin in a mouse model of IAC. The biological effects of statins were evaluated against Candida spp., through the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). For the statins that showed activity, the fungicidal concentration, toxicity/selectivity, synergism with azoles and polyenes, phenotypic effects, and activity against virulence factors were also determined. Atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and fluvastatin were highly active, especially against C. albicans (MIC < 1-128 μg.mL-1) and C. glabrata (MIC 32-64 μg.mL-1). Fluvastatin and atorvastatin were selective for C. albicans in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Moreover, all active statins in the antifungal assay showed high selectivity for fungal cells over bacteria. The combination of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and fluvastatin with azoles was associated with a synergistic effect. Active statins do not act on the fungal membrane or wall, but instead stimulate farnesol-dependent pathogenicity factors such as yeast-to-hyphal transition and biofilm generation. Fluvastatin treatment was evaluated in a mouse model of IAC, showing stimulation of the extra-hepatic dissemination of C. albicans but improvements in renal, splenic, and hepatic histological aspects. In conclusion, statins have potent antifungal activity in vitro, but the therapeutic effect in vivo is restricted to their anti-inflammatory activity.