Congenital cervicofacial vascular anomalies are extremely rare and present many difficulties in diagnosis and treatment requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Firstly, there is little consensus on this subject among head and neck specialists. There are two main types of vascular anomalies: vascular tumors and vascular malformations. Vascular malformations are also divided into malformations with slow blood flow (veins, lymphatics, capillaries or combined) and malformations with a fast blood flow (arteriovenous malformations and fistula). Vascular tumors like hemangiomas are known for their spontaneous involution with aging, while vascular malformations grow in dimensions with age. It is very important to choose the correct differential diagnosis between cervicofacial hemangiomas and vascular malformations for proper therapy management. Anamnesis and clinical exams help in raising suspicions about the real nature of a cervico-vascular anomaly. Furthermore, imaging brings in-depth details of the anomaly, ranging from ultrasound and contrast CT to MRI scanning and minimally invasive angiography. Angiography with selective embolization is rarely a curative procedure for arteriovenous malformations, being more suitable as a preliminary step before attempted surgical removal. Surgery is clearly necessary when there are aesthetic and functional deficits. Slow-flow vascular malformations present a reduced morbidity, and in cases without involution, the surgical ablation is reserved for the cases with aesthetic dysfunctions or psychological trauma. Lymphatic malformations must undergo surgical ablation when they are associated with mass effects and compression of great vessels or aerial viscera. The prognosis after surgical removal is good, with a low rate of recurrence or morbidity. Fast-flow vascular malformations require a combined approach, with embolization and excision in the next 48 h for safety reasons. Removal may be followed by reconstructive surgery depending on the location and dimensions of the malformation, with a possible secondary recovery of the normal microscopic vessels. Some of the masses may hinder the normal airflow and swallowing. Pathology is the gold standard for confirming the clinical and imaging diagnosis.

Background/Objectives: The thyroid gland can represent the seat of development for giant tumors exceeding 10 cm in diameter. A retrospective analysis on 21 cases of giant thyroid tumors with comorbidities, operated in the ENT Department of the Bucharest University Emergency Hospital has been conducted. Methods: Giant benign tumors accounted for 28.57% of the cases studied and reached gigantic volumes in an average time interval of 3 years, with an average resection piece weight of 318 g. Malignant tumors accounted for 71.43%, with an average duration of evolution of 7 years, with an average resection piece weight of 581 g. Results: Dysphagia was present in all patients, dyspnea in 47.61% and dysphonia in 38.09% of cases. Total thyroidectomy is the gold standard in giant thyroid tumors, associated with radical neck dissection, extended to groups VI and VII in malignant tumors. In 10 of 11 cases of giant malignant thyroid tumors (90.90%), without anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, the survival at 5 years after multimodal oncologic treatment was favorable. Anticoagulant treatment increased the risk of postoperative reversible recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion. Conclusions: The management of giant thyroid tumors in patients with multiple comorbidities needs a multidisciplinary team including endocrinologist, radiologist, anesthesiologist, pathologist, ENT surgeon, thoracic surgeon, oncologist and radiotherapist.

It is already known that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to various degrees and forms of lung parenchyma damage, but some cases take a strikingly severe course that is difficult to manage. We report the case of a 62-year old male, non-obese, non-smoker, and non-diabetic, who presented with fever, chills, and shortness of breath. The infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was diagnosed by real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Although the patient had been vaccinated with 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 7 months earlier and had no risk factors for a severe outcome, serial computed tomography (CT) scan revealed lung involvement progressively extending from an initial 30% to 40% to almost 100% 2.5 months later. The spectrum of lung lesions included at first only ground-glass opacities and some tiny emphysema bullae, but later also bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and large emphysema bullae as post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae. For fear of severe evolution of superimposed bacterial infection (Clostridoides difficile enterocolits and possibly bacterial pneumonia) the administration of corticosteroids was intermittent. Massive right pneumothorax secondary to bulla rupture, possibly favored by the indispensable high flow oxygen therapy, led to respiratory failure compounded by hemodynamic instability, and ultimately to the patient’s final demise. COVID-19 pneumonia may cause severe lung parenchyma damage which requires long-term supplemental oxygen therapy. Beneficial or even lifesaving as it might be, high flow oxygen therapy may nonetheless have deleterious effects too, including the development of bullae that may rupture engendering pneumothorax. Corticosteroid treatment should probably be pursued despite superimposed bacterial infection to limit the viral induced damage to lung parenchyma.

There are few examples of mechanical coupling solutions for the transmission of high torques between two rotating shafts that have non-coplanar, non-parallel axes. Based on the structural analysis, the paper proposes a solution for an RP1PR-type symmetrical coupling. The Hartenberg–Denavit methodology is not applicable for performing the kinematical analysis, hence the solution starts from the geometrical condition of the creation of planar pairs of the mechanism, expressed in vector form. The absolute motion of all elements of the mechanism’s structure can be expressed after developing the kinematical analysis. The theoretical results are validated via numerical analysis. By comparing the analytical results with the CATIA-modeled results, excellent compatibility is obtained. We also propose a constructive solution for the newly designed coupling mechanism.

The paper presents a proposed mechanism, RPCR, for the coupling of two shafts with crossed axes. For the analytical kinematics, the Hartenberg–Denavit methodology cannot be applied due to the planar pair occurrence. To apply the screw theory, the planar pair should be replaced by an assembly of cylindrical pairs, but this is also cumbersome. This work proposes an analytical solution obtained from the structural condition of planar joint based on the formulated expressions with respect to adequately chosen reference frames. A system of trigonometrical equations is obtained, but confusions may occur from classical solving; then, this paper presents the methodology with the correct approach. With the analytical solution for the displacements from the joints found, the conditions required for the constructive parameters of a realistic mechanism are found. The kinematical calculus of the mechanism is presented, and analytical relations are obtained for all relative motions from the pairs of the mechanism. The correctness of the analytical solutions is validated by the results of a numerical simulation.

Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with long COVID syndrome. Methods: This study included 457 adults who had at least one persistent symptom after COVID-19 infection. Results: The median time interval between the last SARS-CoV-2 infection and emergency room presentation was 3 months. Older patients had comorbidities (61.7 vs. 44.9 years, p < 0.0001), moderate or severe forms of COVID-19 (61.2 vs. 50.9 years, p < 0.0001), and respiratory symptoms (56.1 vs. 52.0 years, p = 0.0027). Non-vaccinated patients were older than vaccinated patients (56.0 vs. 51.5 years, p = 0.0008) and had residual lung abnormalities following COVID-19 infection (51.5% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.003). The time interval between the last SARS-CoV-2 infection and the hospital evaluation was shorter for vaccinated patients (3.2 vs. 3.9 months, p < 0.0001) and those with mild forms (3.3 vs. 4.12 months, p = 0.0001) versus non-vaccinated individuals. After the last SARS-CoV-2 infection, 107 patients developed impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or diabetes mellitus, being patients with already known chronic diseases (p = 0.0002), or hypertension (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our study pointed out the heterogeneity of symptoms following COVID-19, and they are associated with age, vaccination status, or severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.