There is a paucity of data and minimal literature on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among liver cirrhosis patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes among liver cirrhosis patients post-PCI. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for relevant studies. Effect sizes were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 3 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data from 10,705,976 patients. A total of 28,100 patients were in the PCI + Cirrhosis group and 10,677,876 patients were in the PCI-only group. The mean age of patients with PCI + Cirrhosis and PCI alone was 63.45 and 64.35 years. The most common comorbidity was hypertension among the PCI + Cirrhosis group compared with PCI alone (68.15% vs. 73.6%). Cirrhosis patients post-PCI were had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.78 (95%CI: 3.39–6.75), p < 0.001), GI bleeding (OR, 1.91 (95%CI:1.83–1.99), p < 0.001, I² = 0%), stroke (OR, 2.48 (95%CI:1.68–3.66), p < 0.001), AKI (OR, 3.66 (95%CI: 2.33–6.02), p < 0.001), and vascular complications (OR, 1.50 (95%CI: 1.13–1.98), p < 0.001) compared with the PCI group without cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis are at a high risk for mortality and adverse outcomes post-PCI procedure compared to the PCI-only group of patients.

Diabetic gastroparesis (DG) is one of the many complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Even though this condition surfaces years after uncontrolled disease, it affects the quality of life in several ways and causes significant morbidity. Common symptoms experienced by the patients include postprandial nausea, vomiting, abdominal fullness, and pain. Strict glycemic control is essential to evade the effects of DG. The purpose of this review article is to briefly study the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnostic modalities, and the effects of DG on different aspects of life. Furthermore, it also focuses on the emerging treatment modalities for DG. Tradipitant and relamorelin are two such treatment options that are gaining noteworthy recognition and are discussed in detail in this review article. As observed through various clinical trials, these drugs help alleviate symptoms like nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating in patients suffering from DG, thereby targeting the most common and bothersome symptoms of the disease. This leads to an improvement in the quality of life, making it a reliable treatment option for this disease. But while pharmacological intervention is vital, psychological support and lifestyle changes are equally important and are the reason why a multidisciplinary approach is required for the treatment of DG.

Background: Albumin acts as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species and an inhibitor of inflammatory processes that underlie hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, the role of albumin in hepatic encephalopathy is not well-established. The authors performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albumin in the management of hepatic encephalopathy. Methods: The authors carried out an extensive search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, and various trial registries, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of albumin administration in HE. The authors used a random-effects model for analyses and presented dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes as relative risk and mean difference, along with corresponding 95% CIs, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed using both the I² index and χ² test. Results: Our meta-analysis included 4 RCTs involving 306 patients. Our primary outcomes, mortality, and persistence of HE were reported by all four studies. Albumin was found to significantly decrease mortality in patients with HE [risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.83; I2 =0%]. Persistence of HE was found to be comparable between the two groups (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68–1.00; I2 =24%). There was no significant difference between the albumin and control groups regarding length of hospital stay (MD −1.55, 95% CI −3.5 to 0.14; I2 =41%), adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87–1.16; I2 =0%), and severe adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59–1.35). Conclusion: Albumin administration in patients with hepatic encephalopathy decreases mortality but does not significantly impact the persistence of HE. Further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence.