Phimosis associated with concealed penis is not amenable to ordinary circumcision. To our knowledge we describe a new technique to repair concealed penis. From September 2003 to January 2008, 57 consecutive patients with concealed penis were treated using our technique. Median age at surgery was 33 months (range 7 months to 34 years). The technique consists of 3 steps. Step 1 is a ventral incision to slit the narrow ring of the prepuce and expose the glans. Step 2 is a circumferential skin incision made between 2 edges of the ventral diamond-shaped skin defect, followed by midline incision of the dorsal inner prepuce to make 2 skin flaps connected to the glans. Step 3 is skin coverage. Two skin flaps are brought down and sutured together on the ventral side of the penis. The suture line between the penile shaft skin and the flap eventually becomes elliptical. Medical records were reviewed for voiding function, scar formation, and replies from older patients and the parents of younger children about impressions of the surgical results. Median followup was 26 months. No patient had voiding problems. Lymphedema persisted due to suture line constriction in 2 patients who underwent incision of the constriction. All older patients and the parents of younger children were satisfied with the surgical results. Our new method is easy to design and perform to correct concealed penis. It provides a good cosmetic appearance and seems to be applicable in all cases with deficient penile shaft skin.

To increase the management of self-catheterization in children of school age, a catheter kit consisting of hydrophilic catheter and a packet containing sterilized water was developed. We evaluated the lubricating characteristic and clinical efficacy of this new catheter kit. The catheter kit used in the study was a pocket-size plastic container in which a polyurethane catheter coated with hydrophilic polymer and a packet containing sterilized water were packed in combination. The lubricating characteristic of catheter was assessed by the measurement of friction value. For clinical assessment, male children aged over 6 years old who were doing self-catheterization at 17 medical institutions nationwide were selected as the subjects. The 32 children who had given informed consent (mean age: 11.6 years old) were asked to use the catheter kit continuously for 1 week. The results were investigated by a questionnaire survey in which the assessment before and after the use was expressed in scores. At the same time, urinalysis and urine culture were examined. The friction value of hydrophilic catheter was equivalent to or less than that observed by applying a lubricant to the conventional catheter. The comparison of conventional catheter with the kit indicated significantly higher scores (assessment in 5 grades expressed in scores) for the portability and operability of the kit. Though there was no significant difference in the ease of insertion between the two catheters, there were several comments that the kit got stuck in the urethra when it was withdrawn. The global assessment gave a significantly higher score to the kit and 30 (94%) of the 32 children wanted to use the kit continuously. No increase in hematuria which caused a clinical problem or no new apparent urinary tract infection occurred after the use of the kit. Compared with the conventional catheter, the hydrophilic catheter kit highly satisfied a large number of children at the time of self-catheterization. Depending on the condition of children, the kit is considered useful for continued self-catheterization for a long term.