Hyaluronic acid (HA) is frequently formulated in eye drops to improve the stability of the tear film by hydration and lubrication. Mucoadhesion is related to the ocular residence time and therefore to the effectiveness of the eye drops. The ocular residence time of the HA formulation is correlated with the ability of HA to create specific strong interactions in the ocular surface with the mucus layer, mainly composed of a mixture of secreted mucins (MUC; gel forming MUC5AC and MUC2) and shed membrane-bound soluble mucins (MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16). Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial pathology of the preocular tear film with possible damage to the ocular surface classified in two types: (1) aqueous-deficient dry eye and (2) evaporative dry eye, caused by a decrease in goblet cell density that reduces MUC expression and/or by meibomian gland dysfunction, that results in a drop in the lipidic fraction of the tear film. In this work, the binding affinity between HA and MUC2 has been evaluated with three complementary approaches because the secreted MUCs play a pivotal role in the viscoelastic properties of the tear film: 1. Rheological analysis, measuring the mucoadhesive index and the complex viscosity in relation to MM (Molecular Mass) and concentration; 2. Fluorescence analysis, using a fluorescent hydrophobic probe, to investigate the conformational change of MUC2 during the interaction with the HA polymer; 3. Surface plasmon resonance analysis, used to measure the affinity between MUC2 (immobilized on the surface of a sensor chip) and the HA polymers that flowed on it at the molecular level. For all these tests, the mucoadhesive performance of the natural HA linearly increases with the MM, whereas cross-linked HA and other emollient and gelling agents (formulated in artificial tears) do not show the same mucoadhesive properties (with the exception of xanthan gum). The mucoadhesive performance of high MM HA has also been confirmed in conditions that simulate the pathological condition of the tear film during DED by decreasing the MUC2 or oleic acid concentration. Physico-chemical analysis of a series of marketed artificial tears confirms the linear correlation between the MM of the HA used in the products and the mucoadhesive index measured on the ocular surface model.

High levels of hyaluronan (ΗΑ), a major extracellular matrix (ECM) glycosaminoglycan, have been correlated with poor clinical outcome in several malignancies, including breast cancer. The high and low molecular weight HΑ forms exert diverse biological functions. Depending on their molecular size, ΗΑ forms either promote or attenuate signaling cascades that regulate cancer progression. In order to evaluate the effects of different ΗΑ forms on breast cancer cells' behavior, ΗΑ fragments of defined molecular size were synthesized. Breast cancer cells of different estrogen receptor (ER) status – the low metastatic, ERα-positive MCF-7 epithelial cells and the highly aggressive, ERβ-positive MDA-MB-231 mesenchymal cells – were evaluated following treatment with HA fragments. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that HA fragments critically affect the morphology of breast cancer cells in a molecular-size dependent mode. Moreover, the ΗΑ fragments affect cell functional properties, the expression of major ECM mediators and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (ΕΜΤ) markers. Notably, treatment with 200 kDa ΗΑ increased the expression levels of the epithelial marker Ε-cadherin and reduced the expression levels of HA synthase 2 and mesenchymal markers, like fibronectin and snail2/slug. These novel data suggest that the effects of HA in breast cancer cells depend on the molecular size and the ER status. An in-depth understanding on the mechanistic basis of these effects may contribute on the development of novel therapeutic strategies for the pharmacological targeting of aggressive breast cancer.

The success of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers, with more than 2 million minimally invasive procedures conducted in 2016 in the US alone, is due to their hygroscopic properties of biocompatibility and reversibility. The type and density of HA cross-linkage, as well as the manufacturing technology, may influence not only the in vivo persistence but also the safety profile of dermal fillers. 1,4-Butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) is the cross-linker used in most market-leading HA fillers; 1,4-butanediol di-(propan-2,3-diolyl) ether (BDPE) is the major impurity obtained from the HA–BDDE cross-linking (HBC) process. In this work, a new process to obtain high purity HBC fillers was developed. A new HPLC-MS method was validated for the quantification of BDPE content in HBC dermal fillers. In vitro cytotoxicity of BDPE was evaluated in fibroblasts (IC₅₀ = 0.48 mg/mL). The viscoelasticity was monitored during the shelf-life of the HBC-10% hydrogel and was correlated with in vitro hyaluronidase resistance and in vivo residence time in a rabbit model. This analysis showed that elasticity is the best parameter to predict the in vivo residence time. Finally, a series of parameters were investigated in certain marketed dermal fillers and were compared with the results of the HBC-10% hydrogel.