Heinz P. Nasheuer

Prof. Dr. Heinz P. Nasheuer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2004 in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndreas Beyer
Andreas Beyer
JHJens Hollunder
Jens Hollunder
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
TWThomas Wilhelm
Thomas Wilhelm
Based on large-scale data for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (protein and mRNA abundance, translational status, transcript length), we investigate the relation of transcription, translation, and protein turnover on a genome-wide scale. We elucidate variations between different spatial cell compartments and functional modules by comparing protein-to-mRNA ratios, translational activity, and a novel descriptor for protein-specific degradation (protein half-life descriptor). This analysis helps to understand the cell’s strategy to use transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms for managing protein levels. For instance, it is possible to identify modules that are subject to suppressed translation under normal conditions (“translation on demand”). In order to reduce inconsistencies between the datasets, we compiled a new reference mRNA abundance dataset and we present a novel approach to correct large microarray signals for a saturation bias. Accounting for ribosome density based on transcript length rather than ORF length improves the correlation of observed protein levels to translational activity. We discuss potential causes for the deviations of these correlations. Finally, we introduce a quantitative descriptor for protein degradation (protein half-life descriptor) and compare it to measured half-lives. The study demonstrates significant post-transcriptional control of protein levels for a number of different compartments and functional modules, which is missed when exclusively focusing on transcript levels.

1 March 2000 in Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UHUlrich Hübscher
Ulrich Hübscher
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
JSJuhani E Syväoja
Juhani E Syväoja

1 April 1991 in Molecular and Cellular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPB E Pearson
B E Pearson
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
TWT S Wang
T S Wang
We have investigated the DNA polymerase alpha promoter sequence requirements for the expression of a heterologous gene in actively cycling cells and following serum addition to serum-deprived cells. An 11.4-kb genomic clone that spans the 5' end of this gene and includes 1.62 kb of sequence upstream from the translation start site was isolated. The transcription start site was mapped at 46 +/- 1 nucleotides upstream from the translation start site. The upstream sequence is GC rich and lacks a TATA sequence but has a CCAAT sequence on the opposite strand. Analysis of a set of deletion constructs in transient transfection assays demonstrated that efficient expression of the reporter in cycling cells requires 248 bp of sequence upstream from the cap site. Clustered within these 248 nucleotides are sequences similar to consensus sequences for Sp1-, Ap1-, Ap2-, and E2F-binding sites. The CCAAT sequence and the potential E2F- and Ap1-binding sites are shown to be protected from DNase I digestion by partially purified nuclear proteins. The DNA polymerase alpha promoter can confer upon the reporter an appropriate, late response to serum addition. No single sequence element could be shown to confer serum inducibility. Rather, multiple sequence elements appear to mediate the full serum response.

1 October 2011 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SZSuisheng Zhang
Suisheng Zhang
KRKevin Roche
Kevin Roche
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
NLNoel Francis Lowndes
Noel Francis Lowndes
The monosaccharide, β-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), can be added to the hydroxyl group of either serines or threonines to generate an O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) residue (Love, D. C., and Hanover, J. A. (2005) Sci. STKE 2005 312, 1-14; Hart, G. W., Housley, M. P., and Slawson, C. (2007) Nature 446, 1017-1022). This post-translational protein modification, termed O-GlcNAcylation, is reversible, analogous to phosphorylation, and has been implicated in many cellular processes. Here, we present evidence that in human cells all four core histones of the nucleosome are substrates for this glycosylation in the relative abundance H3, H4/H2B, and H2A. Increasing the intracellular level of UDP-GlcNAc, the nucleotide sugar donor substrate for O-GlcNAcylation enhanced histone O-GlcNAcylation and partially suppressed phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 (H3S10ph). Expression of recombinant H3.3 harboring an S10A mutation abrogated histone H3 O-GlcNAcylation relative to its wild-type version, consistent with H3S10 being a site of histone O-GlcNAcylation (H3S10glc). Moreover, O-GlcNAcylated histones were lost from H3S10ph immunoprecipitates, whereas immunoprecipitation of either H3K4me3 or H3K9me3 (active or inactive histone marks, respectively) resulted in co-immunoprecipitation of O-GlcNAcylated histones. We also examined histone O-GlcNAcylation during cell cycle progression. Histone O-GlcNAcylation is high in G(1) cells, declines throughout the S phase, increases again during late S/early G(2), and persists through late G(2) and mitosis. Thus, O-GlcNAcylation is a novel histone post-translational modification regulating chromatin conformation during transcription and cell cycle progression.

15 April 1998 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFrançoise Dantzer
Françoise Dantzer
GMGilbert de Murcia
Gilbert de Murcia
JMJosiane Ménissier-De Murcia
Josiane Ménissier-De Murcia
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
JVJean-Luc Vonesch
Jean-Luc Vonesch
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is an element of the DNA damage surveillance network evolved by eukaryotic cells to cope with numerous environmental and endogenous genotoxic agents. PARP has been found to be involved in vivo in both cell proliferation and base excision repair of DNA. In this study the interaction between PARP and the DNA polymerase α-primase tetramer has been examined. We provide evidence that in proliferating cells: (i) PARP is physically associated with the catalytic subunit of the DNA polymerase α-primase tetramer, an association confirmed by confocal microscopy, demonstrating that both enzymes are co-localized at the nuclear periphery of HeLa cells; (ii) this interaction requires the integrity of the second zinc finger of PARP and is maximal during the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle; (iii) PARP-deficient cells derived from PARP knock-out mice exhibited reduced DNA polymerase activity, compared with the parental cells, a reduction accentuated following exposure to sublethal doses of methylmethanesulfonate. Altogether, the present results strongly suggest that PARP participates in a DNA damage survey mechanism implying its nick-sensor function as part of the control of replication fork progression when breaks are present in the template.

1 November 1986 in European Journal of Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGFrank Grosse
Frank Grosse
Heinz P. NasheuerHeinz P. Nasheuer
Heinz P. Nasheuer
SSStephan Scholtissek
Stephan Scholtissek
USUlrich Schomburg
Ulrich Schomburg
Affinity chromatography on double‐stranded (ds) and single‐stranded (ss) DNA‐cellulose columns was employed to find analogs of the Escherichia coli and T4 single‐stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB proteins) in calf thymus. The interaction of several purified SSB proteins with the pure DNA‐polymerase‐α‐primase complex on DNA synthesis on activated DNA and on primase‐initiated M13 DNA served as a criterion for a possible involvement of one of these proteins in the process of DNA replication. Two SSB proteins were purified to essential homogeneity. These most abundant proteins exhibited apparent relative molecular masses of 35000 (SSB‐35) and 37000 (SSB‐37) for the protomers and 140000 and 80000 for the native enzymes. Both proteins resisted elution with 0.5 mg/ml dextran sulfate and were eluted from the ssDNA‐cellulose with 0.2 M and 1 M NaCl, respectively. SSB‐35 stimulated the DNA‐polymerase‐α–primase complex from the same organism up to fivefold over a broad range of DNA covering. By contrast, SSB‐37 inhibited the primase‐initiated replication of M13 DNA. Like most eukaryotic SSB proteins, these proteins showed a 300‐fold preference for binding to ssDNA over dsDNA in a nitrocellulose filter binding assay, as well as strong binding to several DNA and RNA homopolymers. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a cooperative mode of binding for SSB‐37. Although SSB‐35 and SSB‐37 behave as typically eukaryotic SSB proteins in all assays employed, we tested these SSB proteins for dehydrogenase activities as well. SSB‐35 was found to be identical with lactate dehydrogenase and SSB‐37 was identical with a dimeric form of glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase. These results imply that further studies are mandatory in order to prove the authenticity of eukaryotic SSB proteins.