Integrin αvβ3 is more highly expressed in high-grade glioma cells than in normal tissues. In this study, a novel boron-10 carrier containing maleimide-functionalized closo-dodecaborate (MID), serum albumin as a drug delivery system, and cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartate (cRGD) that can target integrin αvβ3 was developed. The efficacy of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) targeting integrin αvβ3 in glioma cells in the brain of rats using a cRGD-functionalized MID-albumin conjugate (cRGD-MID-AC) was evaluated. F98 glioma cells exposed to boronophenylalanine (BPA), cRGD-MID-AC, and cRGD + MID were used for cellular uptake and neutron-irradiation experiments. An F98 glioma-bearing rat brain tumor model was used for biodistribution and neutron-irradiation experiments after BPA or cRGD-MID-AC administration. BNCT using cRGD-MID-AC had a sufficient cell-killing effect in vitro, similar to that with BNCT using BPA. In biodistribution experiments, cRGD-MID-AC accumulated in the brain tumor, with the highest boron concentration observed 8 h after administration. Significant differences were observed between the untreated group and BNCT using cRGD-MID-AC groups in the in vivo neutron-irradiation experiments through the log-rank test. Long-term survivors were observed only in BNCT using cRGD-MID-AC groups 8 h after intravenous administration. These findings suggest that BNCT with cRGD-MID-AC is highly selective against gliomas through a mechanism that is different from that of BNCT with BPA.
High-grade gliomas present a significant challenge in neuro-oncology because of their aggressive nature and resistance to current therapies. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a potential treatment method; however, the boron used by the carrier compounds—such as 4-borono-L-phenylalanine (L-BPA)—have limitations. This study evaluated the use of boron-conjugated 4-iodophenylbutanamide (BC-IP), a novel boron compound in BNCT, for the treatment of glioma. Using in vitro drug exposure experiments and in vivo studies, we compared BC-IP and BPA, with a focus on boron uptake and retention characteristics. The results showed that although BC-IP had a lower boron uptake than BPA, it exhibited superior retention. Furthermore, despite lower boron accumulation in tumors, BNCT mediated by BC-IP showed significant survival improvement in glioma-bearing rats compared to controls (not treated animals and neutrons only). These results suggest that BC-IP, with its unique properties, may be an alternative boron carrier for BNCT. Further research is required to optimize this potential treatment modality, which could significantly contribute to advancing the treatment of high-grade gliomas.
Background: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a precise particle radiation therapy known for its unique cellular targeting ability. The development of innovative boron carriers is crucial for the advancement of BNCT technologies. Our previous study demonstrated the potential of PBC-IP administered via convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in an F98 rat glioma model. This approach significantly extended rat survival in neutron irradiation experiments, with half achieving long-term survival, akin to a cure, in a rat brain tumor model. Our commitment to clinical applicability has spurred additional nonclinical pharmacodynamic research, including an investigation into the effects of cannula position and the time elapsed post-CED administration. Methods: In comprehensive in vivo experiments conducted on an F98 rat brain tumor model, we meticulously examined the boron distribution and neutron irradiation experiments at various sites and multiple time intervals following CED administration. Results: The PBC-IP showed substantial efficacy for BNCT, revealing minimal differences in tumor boron concentration between central and peripheral CED administration, although a gradual decline in intratumoral boron concentration post-administration was observed. Therapeutic efficacy remained robust, particularly when employing cannula insertion at the tumor margin, compared to central injections. Even delayed neutron irradiation showed notable effectiveness, albeit with a slightly reduced survival period. These findings underscore the robust clinical potential of CED-administered PBC-IP in the treatment of malignant gliomas, offering adaptability across an array of treatment protocols. Conclusions: This study represents a significant leap forward in the quest to enhance BNCT for the management of malignant gliomas, opening promising avenues for clinical translation.
High-grade gliomas present a significant challenge in neuro-oncology because of their aggressive nature and resistance to current therapies. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a potential treatment method; however, the boron carrier compounds used — such as 4-borono-L-phenylalanine (L-BPA) — have limitations. This study evaluated the use of boron-conjugated 4-iodophenylbutanamide (BC-IP), a novel boron compound in BNCT, for the treatment of glioma. Using in vitro drug exposure experiments and in vivo studies, we compared BC-IP and BPA, with a focus on boron uptake and retention characteristics. The results showed that although BC-IP had a lower boron uptake than BPA, it exhibited superior retention. Furthermore, despite lower boron accumulation in tumors, BC-IP showed significant survival improvement in glioma-bearing rats compared to controls. These results suggest that BC-IP, with its unique properties, may be an alternative boron carrier for BNCT. Further research is required to optimize this potential treatment modality, which could significantly contribute to advancing the treatment of high-grade gliomas.
Knowing how to accumulate boron into the tumor cells is a crucial aspect of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), which can be targeted at the cellular level, and the development of novel boron agents other than BPA, which is used in clinical practice, is urgently needed