Loek van Van Heerebeek

Dr. Loek van Van Heerebeek


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 October 2020 in ESC Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMariëlle Scheffer
Mariëlle Scheffer
ADAnnet Driessen-Waaijer
Annet Driessen-Waaijer
NHNazha Hamdani
Nazha Hamdani
JLJochem W.D. Landzaat
Jochem W.D. Landzaat
NJNini H. Jonkman
Nini H. Jonkman
LHLoek van Van Heerebeek
Loek van Van Heerebeek
Aims: High myocardial stiffness in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is attributed to comorbidity-induced structural and functional remodelling through inflammation and oxidative stress affecting coronary microvascular endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, which augments interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte stiffness. In murine and human HFpEF myocardium, sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition ameliorates cardiac microvascular endothelial cell and cardiomyocyte oxidative stress, while enhancing myocardial protein kinase G activity and lowering titin-based cardiomyocyte stiffness. Failure of previous HFpEF outcome trials refocuses attention to improving pathophysiological insight and trial design with better phenotyping of patients and matching of therapeutic targets to prevailing pathogenetic mechanisms. SGLT2 inhibition could represent a viable therapeutic option especially in HFpEF patients in whom high diastolic left ventricular (LV) stiffness is predominantly caused by elevated cardiomyocyte stiffness and associated endothelial dysfunction, whereas HFpEF patients with extensive myocardial fibrosis might be less responsive. This study aims to investigate a stratified treatment approach, using dapagliflozin in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction without evidence of significant myocardial fibrosis. Methods and results: The Stratified Treatment to Ameliorate DIAstolic left ventricular stiffness in early Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (STADIA-HFpEF) is a Phase II, randomized, 2 × 2 crossover trial, evaluating the efficacy of 13 weeks of treatment with dapagliflozin 10 mg od in 26 patients with HFpEF, with normal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-derived extracellular volume. The co-primary endpoint is echocardiographically derived change in E/e'/LV end-diastolic volume index and change in mean LV e'. Conclusions: The STADIA-HFpEF trial will be the first study to evaluate the direct effects of dapagliflozin on amelioration of LV stiffness, using histological phenotyping to discern early HFpEF.

13 March 2023 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECElisa Dal Canto
Elisa Dal Canto
MSMarielle Scheffer
Marielle Scheffer
KKKirsten Kortekaas
Kirsten Kortekaas
ADAnnet Driessen-Waaijer
Annet Driessen-Waaijer
WPWalter J. Paulus
Walter J. Paulus
LHLoek van Van Heerebeek
Loek van Van Heerebeek
In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), natriuretic peptide (NP) levels are frequently lower. In several trials, the outcome differed between patients with low and high NP levels. This suggests that NP could be used to identify distinct stages of left ventricular (LV) remodeling and myocardial tissue composition. This study investigated cardiac remodeling/dysfunction and myocardial tissue characteristics assessed by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in HFpEF patients in relation to NP levels. Clinical and echocardiographic data of 152 HFpEF patients were derived from outpatient visits. A total of 71 HFpEF patients underwent CMR-derived T1-mapping. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine the association of NT-proBNP categories ( median) and NT-proBNP as continuous variable with echocardiography and CMR-derived T1-mapping. Mean age was 71 ± 9, 93% of patients were women and median NT-proBNP was 195 pg/mL, with 35% of patients below the diagnostic cut-off value (<125 pg/mL). Patients with high NT-proBNP had comparable LV systolic function and LV relaxation but significantly worse LV stiffness and left atrial function compared with patients with low NT-proBNP. Higher NT-proBNP was significantly associated with higher LV stiffness and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) (β = 1.82, 95% CI: 0.19;3.44, p = 0.029). Higher NT-proBNP levels identify HFpEF patients with worse LV stiffness because of more severe myocardial extracellular matrix remodeling, representing an advanced stage of HFpEF.

17 August 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NFNick Fagel
Nick Fagel
SLSteven Leuven
Steven Leuven
WKWouter J. Kikkert
Wouter J. Kikkert
MLMichelle M. de Leau
Michelle M. de Leau
LHLoek van Van Heerebeek
Loek van Van Heerebeek
RRRobert Riezebos
Robert Riezebos
The timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains a matter of debate. The relationship between the timing of invasive management and left ventricular function (LVF) is largely unknown. The An Immediate or Early Invasive Strategy in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome trial (OPTIMA-2) was a randomized controlled prospective open-label multicenter trial that randomized 249 NSTE-ACS patients to either an immediate (<3 h) invasive treatment strategy or an early strategy (12–24 h). Patients were pre-treated with a combination of aspirin, ticagrelor and fondaparinux. The aim of this prespecified sub-analysis was to assess (the recovery of) left ventricular function by analysing echocardiography data obtained <72 h after admission and at 30-day follow-up, for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. LVF was determined using ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Inter-observer variability was tested. No difference in the recovery of EF was found between an immediate and early strategy if the follow-up echocardiograms were compared to baseline: 2.5% (standard deviation (SD): 7.9) and 3.3% (SD: 8.5), p = 0.51, nor was there any difference in GLS recovery between the study groups: −0.8% (SD: 2.5) vs. −0.7% (SD 2.8) p = 0.82. If baseline and follow-up echocardiograms were compared, there was a similar but significant improvement in both EF and GLS in both separate study groups. An immediate invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS patients did not result in an improved left ventricular EF or GLS recovery compared with an early strategy.