Occupancy, which refers to the occupant count in this paper, is one of the main factors affecting the energy consumption of commercial buildings. It is important for both building managers and energy simulation engineers to understand how an entire building’s energy consumption varies with different occupancy levels in the process of building automation systems or in assessments of building performance with benchmarking lines. Because commercial buildings usually have large scales, complex layouts and a large number of people, it is a challenge to simulate the relationships between an entire building’s energy consumption and occupancy. This study proposes a fast method for calculating the influence of occupancy on the energy consumption of commercial buildings with different building layouts and existing occupancies. Other occupant behaviors, such as the opening of windows and adjustment of shading devices, are comprehensively reflected in two basic building parameters: the balance point temperature and the total heat transmission coefficient of the building. This new method can be easily used to analyze how building energy varies with occupancy without a physical building’s energy model. An office building in Shanghai is taken as a case study to validate the proposed method. The results show that the coefficient of determination R2 between the calculated value and actual value is 0.86, 0.8 and 0.71 for lighting, cooling and heating energy, respectively, which is suitable in engineering applications.
A method based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks is proposed to forecast hourly energy consumption. Using an office building in Shanghai as a case study, hourly data on occupancy, weather, and energy consumption were collected. Daily energy consumption was analyzed using single-link clustering, and days were classified into three types. The key input variables significantly influencing energy consumption, solar radiation, occupancy, and outdoor dry bulb temperature are identified by the Pearson correlation coefficient. By comparing five algorithms, it was found that the LSTM model performed the best. After considering the occupancy, the hourly MAPE was reduced from 11% to 9%. Accuracy improvements for each day type were noted as 1% for weekdays, 4% for Saturday, and 7% for Sunday. Further analysis indicated that the model started to predict the time (1:00) and commute time (7:00 and 17:00) with large errors. The model was optimized by varying the time step. For the times 1:00, 7:00, and 17:00, the best optimization of the model was achieved when the time step values were set to 6 h, 24 h, and 18 h with an MAPE of 3%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. As the model time step increased (≤2 weeks), the accuracy of the model decreased to 6%.
As most residents spend more than 90% of their time in buildings, acceptable and reasonable control of both indoor thermal comfort and air quality is imperative to ensure occupants’ health status and work productivity. However, current control strategies generally take either thermal comfort or indoor air quality as a single loop, rather than the concurrent control of two. To analyze their mutual influence, this study investigated the performance of three multi-control approaches, i.e., proportional integral derivative (PID) control of thermal comfort and a fixed outdoor air ratio, PID control of thermal comfort and design outdoor air rate, and PID control of thermal comfort and occupancy-based demand-controlled ventilation. As a pilot study, three typical control methods were implemented to a multi-zone building via OpenModelica modeling. The results indicate that indoor air temperature can be well-maintained under three control methods, however, the CO2 concentration under the fixed outdoor air ratio was over 1000 ppm, leading to poor indoor air quality. The control strategy with the design outdoor air rate could not properly ensure the CO2 concentration, due to the over-ventilated or under-ventilated phenomena, subsequently resulting in unnecessary energy waste. The occupancy-based demand controlled ventilation could maintain the CO2 concentration under the set-point with an intermediate power energy utilization.
As high-energy-consumption underground public space, subway stations are responsible for a particularly significant proportion of air-conditioning energy use, especially during the cooling season, making the investigation of cooling-load characteristics highly important. However, the determination of independent influencing factors in different situations has not yet reached a consensus, and the role of interaction effects is lacking, which hinders the development of energy-saving strategies. For this purpose, this study proposes a sensitivity analysis framework based on 10 typical influencing factors from thermal parameters, meteorological parameters, internal heat disturbances, and indoor environmental setpoints. An input set was generated by integrating equal-step parameter discretization and Saltelli quasi-MonteCarlo sampling. A database containing 11,264 samples was constructed through an EnergyPlus–Python co-simulation method. Based on the Sobol global sensitivity analysis, the key influencing factors of subway station cooling load were identified and quantified, and the impact of these 10 factors was systematically analyzed. Results show that occupant density (SiT = 0.5605) and fresh air volume (SiT = 0.4546) are the dominant factors, contributing more than 50% of the load variance. In contrast, the characteristics of an underground structure significantly weaken the influence of the building-envelope heat transfer coefficient (SiT = 0.1482) and soil temperature (SiT = 0.0884). Furthermore, five groups of strong interaction effects were identified in this study, including occupant density–fresh air volume (Sij = 0.1094), revealing a nonlinear load response mechanism driven by multi-parameter coupling. This research provides a theoretical foundation and quantitative tool for the refined design and optimized dynamic coupled operation of underground transportation hubs.