This qualitative study relates to the textual coherence in the Prologue of The Holy Woman by Qaisra Shahraz and the Epilogue of Unmarriageable by Soniah Kamal, in relation to linguistic features that provide cultural implications in the relevant texts. As this research shows through the deconstruction of the narrative strategies and thematic contents of sections, imagery, dialogue and the subject-verb-object construction all contribute to the stylisation of cultural ethnicity and social decencies. The Prologue of The Holy Woman enforces and questions the rigid gender roles and religious expectations in a Muslim family; the conclusion of Unmarriageable questions the rigid culture of marriage and identity of Pakistani women. Thus, the present paper, adopting an inductive thematic analysis, features literature stressing connections between linguistic cohesiveness and cultural matrices as well as providing readers with an understanding of the everyday realities of South Asian women. Results highlight the connection between language, cultural, and social issues and point to the possibilities for a critical view of gender, marriage, and freedom in literature. The study helps in establishing the diminished link between language and culture in postcolonial tradition and provide the scholars with ways in which these authors engages in using the language tools to broker the cultural relevancy today from the culture of the past.
10 December 2024 in Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Pragmatic hedges play a significant and widespread role in moderating the directness and tone of conversation in the process daily language use and interpersonal communication. These linguistic tools are used to soften statements, introduce uncertainty, or provide a buffer in potentially confrontational situations. Hedges, therefore, possess a distinctive pragmatic value by reducing the force of information in sentences, weakening their assertiveness, and subtly shifting the topic of conversation. This paper adopts the Politeness Principle, as proposed by Geoffrey Leech, as its theoretical framework to explore the pragmatic functions of hedges in language. The analysis is focused on the use of hedges in the prologue of the Holy woman and epilogue of Unmarriageable, employing a qualitative research methodology. Through this lens, the study investigates how hedges are employed by characters to navigate social interactions and manage communication effectively. The findings reveal seven main functions of hedges i.e. softening the situation, giving emotional expression, implying confidence and subjective judgment, rhetorical question, cultural framing, and respect of autonomy. These politeness strategies help to maintain a harmonious and respectful communication environment, play a role in saving face and protecting one's self-image, contribute to politeness by rendering expressions more euphemistic and less direct and finally, enhance the appropriateness and acceptability of words in specific social contexts. These functions underscore the crucial role of hedges in ensuring that narrative communication remains tactful, sensitive, and effective in various interpersonal settings.
The study is based on hegemonic masculinity presented and identified through directive speech acts. It is a qualitative textual analysis based on data from the prologue of The Holy Woman. The study uses purposive sampling techniques and draws on speech act theory and masculinity theory. The results highlight that male characters employ reprimands, honour-based appeals and commands for the exercise of control over female behaviour, which identify the hegemonic masculinity. The writer uses directive speech acts as a patterned discourse which reflects patriarchal ideology. The analysis overall confirms directive speech acts as a discursive tool that reproduces a hierarchical gender order.
Target Situation Analysis (TSA) is used in this review study to investigate the expert opinion about the requirements for academic writing when producing a social science research thesis, specifically about English for Academic Purposes (EAP). According to Basturkmen (2010) and Dudley-Evans & St. John (1998), task-specific assessment (TSA) entails determining the particular tasks, abilities, and language requirements of students in the intended academic setting. This article focuses on the expectations of examiners in EAP, important academic norms for thesis writing, and linguistic and rhetorical elements that can help ESL students overcome obstacles. In order to fulfill the demands of ESL students doing social science research, this TSA intends to inform effective instructional approaches and support systems by reviewing the body of existing literature. These writing requirements were assessed using a systematic literature review methodology and a qualitative design. Themes including thesis writing, the function of the social sciences, academic expectations, and the flow and structure of the thesis were identified through thematic analysis of scholarly guides and studies. Important findings show that writing with precision, consistency, and clarity is still quite difficult, especially for non-native speakers. In order to produce high-quality theses, social science researchers need certain abilities including critical thinking and good communication in addition to language[1] competency. The results underscore the necessity of customized assistance, including focused writing training, mentorship, and peer evaluation, in order to improve research thesis quality in Pakistan and foster scholarly distinction. Future studies should concentrate on efficient teaching strategies, the influence of language ability on the caliber of theses, and the creation of assessment instruments to help students even more. By addressing these unmet requirements for academic writing in Pakistan, researchers will be better equipped to do excellent work that makes a significant contribution to their areas.