Kim Lewis

Dr. Kim Lewis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 January 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLosee L. Ling
Losee L. Ling
TSTanja Schneider
Tanja Schneider
APAaron J. Peoples
Aaron J. Peoples
ASAmy L. Spoering
Amy L. Spoering
IEIna Engels
Ina Engels
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis

13 October 2010 in Annual Review of Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis
Persisters are dormant variants of regular cells that form stochastically in microbial populations and are highly tolerant to antibiotics. High persister (hip) mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are selected in patients with cystic fibrosis. Similarly, hip mutants of Candida albicans are selected in patients with an oral thrush biofilm. These observations suggest that persisters may be the main culprit responsible for the recalcitrance of chronic infectious disease to antimicrobial therapy. Screening knockout libraries has not produced mutants lacking persisters, indicating that dormancy mechanisms are redundant. Toxin/antitoxin (TA) modules are involved in persister formation in Escherichia coli. The SOS response leads to overexpression of the TisB toxin and persister formation. TisB is a membrane-acting peptide that apparently sends cells into dormancy by decreasing the proton motive force and ATP levels. Stress responses may act as general activators of persister formation. Proteins required for maintaining persisters may represent realistic targets for discovery of drugs capable of effectively treating chronic infections.

4 December 2006 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis

30 April 2013 in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis

10 December 2018 in Nature Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPhilip Strandwitz
Philip Strandwitz
Ki Hyun KimKi Hyun Kim
Ki Hyun Kim
DTDarya Terekhova
Darya Terekhova
JLJoanne K. Liu
Joanne K. Liu
ASAnukriti Sharma
Anukriti Sharma
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis

1 December 2001 in Journal of Bacteriology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAmy L. Spoering
Amy L. Spoering
KLKim Lewis
Kim Lewis
Biofilms are considered to be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Strictly speaking, this is not the case—biofilms do not grow in the presence of antimicrobials any better than do planktonic cells. Biofilms are indeed highly resistant to killing by bactericidal antimicrobials, compared to logarithmic-phase planktonic cells, and therefore exhibit tolerance. It is assumed that biofilms are also significantly more tolerant than stationary-phase planktonic cells. A detailed comparative examination of tolerance of biofilms versus stationary- and logarithmic-phase planktonic cells with four different antimicrobial agents was performed in this study. Carbenicillin appeared to be completely ineffective against both stationary-phase cells and biofilms. Killing by this β-lactam antibiotic depends on rapid growth, and this result confirms the notion of slow-growing biofilms resembling the stationary state. Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that kills nongrowing cells, and biofilms and stationary-phase cells were comparably tolerant to this antibiotic. The majority of cells in both populations were eradicated at low levels of ofloxacin, leaving a fraction of essentially invulnerable persisters. The bulk of the population in both biofilm and stationary-phase cultures was tolerant to tobramycin. At very high tobramycin concentrations, a fraction of persister cells became apparent in stationary-phase culture. Stationary-phase cells were more tolerant to the biocide peracetic acid than were biofilms. In general, stationary-phase cells were somewhat more tolerant than biofilms in all of the cases examined. We concluded that, at least for Pseudomonas aeruginosa , one of the model organisms for biofilm studies, the notion that biofilms have greater resistance than do planktonic cells is unwarranted. We further suggest that tolerance to antibiotics in stationary-phase or biofilm cultures is largely dependent on the presence of persister cells.