Siew Kuan - Chua

Dr. Siew Kuan - Chua


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IOIda Kartini Othman
Ida Kartini Othman
NRNaresh Bhaskar Raj
Naresh Bhaskar Raj
SCSiew Kuan - Chua
Siew Kuan - Chua
SSSabrilhakim Sidek
Sabrilhakim Sidek
LWLing Shing Wong
Ling Shing Wong
Siddharthan SelvarajSiddharthan Selvaraj
Siddharthan Selvaraj
Low back pain is a serious threat to human health and the illness jeopardizes the human workforce and pressurizes the health system in the community. Low back pain might be related to piriformis syndrome (PS), which is a disorder presented as muscular spasm and hypertrophy that is strongly associated with piriformis thickness. Nevertheless, the relationship between piriformis thickness and morphological and functional changes of the gluteal muscles in PS remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the thickness, strength, and activation of piriformis and gluteus muscles (maximus and medius) among low back pain (LBP) patients with and without PS. This is a case-control study conducted at HSNZ and UiTM from 2019–2020. A total number of 91 participants (LBP + PS (n = 36), LBP − PS (n = 24), and healthy (n = 31)) were recruited in this study. Negative radiography, specific symptoms, and a positive PS test were applied for PS diagnoses. The thickness, strength, and activation of piriformis and gluteus muscles were measured using ultrasonography (USG) and a surface electromyogram, respectively. Resultantly, the one-way ANOVA test demonstrated no significant difference in piriformis thickness between LBP + PS and LBP − PS (p > 0.01). Piriformis thickness was inversely correlated with gluteus maximus strength (r = −0.4, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with gluteus medius activation (r = 0.48, p < 0.01) in LBP + PS. Stepwise linear regression for LBP + PS revealed a significant association between piriformis thickness and gluteus maximus strength (R = −0.34, accounted for 11% of the variance) and gluteus medius activation in prone lying with the hip in an externally rotated, abducted, and extended (ERABEX) position (R = 0.43, accounted for 23% of the variance). With the adjustment of age and gender, piriformis thickness, gluteus maximus strength, and gluteus medius activation in prone lying with hip ERABEX demonstrated a significant association, but no independent effect of age and gender was detected within the range. Meanwhile, a significant association between piriformis thickness and gluteus maximus thickness was observed (R = 0.44, accounted for 19% of the variance) in the LBP − PS group. These findings may assist to elucidate the actions and functions of piriformis and gluteus muscle in LBP with and without PS.

30 April 2023 in Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShazreen Shaifuddin
Shazreen Shaifuddin
ZZZarina Zahari
Zarina Zahari
SCSiew Kuan - Chua
Siew Kuan - Chua
SASuci Amanati
Suci Amanati
Aims: To explores the short-term effects of a self-management myofascial approach in managing LBP. Objective: Firstly; To compare self-MFR and static hamstring stretching intervention on pain and flexibility. Secondly: To determine the effect of self-MFR on pain and flexibility. Methods: Seventy participants were randomly assigned equally into intervention and control groups. The intervention participants performed self-MFR on the plantar using a tennis ball. The control group performed static hamstring stretching. Findings: There was a significant difference in flexibility between both groups (p<0.05). There was a significant effect of self-MFR on pain (t:6.21;p<0.05) and flexibility (t: -5.65 p<0.05) among LBP adults. Keywords: Low back pain; Muscle flexibility; Self - myofascial release; Pain intensity eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2023. The Authors. Published for AMER & cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i24.4687