In recent years, several automated processing pipelines have become available for pediatric EEG studies, increasing the ease-of-use, replicability, and robustness of available datasets. Here, we compared EEG outcomes derived from two widely used preprocessing pipelines, MADE and HAPPE, across three tasks (visually evoked potential (VEP), auditory oddball, and face processing), as well as resting state, in 81 infants (50.6% female; MeanAge = 5.51 months; RangeAge= 2.8-7.8 months) from the HBCD data release 1.0. Broad parameters such as filter cut-offs, automatic noise reduction, channel interpolation, and re-referencing were kept consistent between pipelines while core characteristics of HAPPE and MADE (e.g. HAPPE’s wavelets and MADE’s ICA with adjusted-Adjust to reduce noise) were retained. ERP mean amplitudes for common developmental components (VEP: N1-P1-N2; auditory oddball: MMR; Face: Nc, N290, P1, P400) were calculated, and no significant differences emerged across pipelines for any tasks. Best-practice metrics for data quality such as reliability, effect size, and SME were evaluated, and only one difference emerged. MADE had a significantly higher value (Δ = 0.13, d = 0.37, p = 0.003) for the SME of the deviant condition at the frontal-lateral cluster in the auditory oddball task. For absolute power during resting state, participants preprocessed through MADE had higher power in the gamma band (Δ = 0.12 µV2, d = 1.19, p < 0.001) than when processed with HAPPE. These findings show that MADE and HAPPE produce convergent, reproducible outcomes across the study's core paradigms, providing empirical guidance for pipeline selection in infant EEG research.