Indonesia’s converted peatland areas have a well-established fire problem, but limited studies have examined the frequency with which they are burning. Here, we quantify fire frequency in Indonesia’s two largest peatland regions, Sumatra and Kalimantan, during 2001–2018. We report, annual areas burned, total peatland area affected by fires, amount of recurrent burning and associations with land-use and land-cover (LULC) change. We based these analyses on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Terra/Aqua combined burned area and three Landsat-derived LULC maps (1990, 2007, and 2015) and explored relationships between burning and land-cover types. Cumulative areas burned amounted nearly half of the surface areas of Sumatra and Kalimantan but were concentrated in only ~25% of the land areas. Although peatlands cover only 13% of Sumatra and Kalimantan, annual percentage of area burning in these areas was almost five times greater than in non-peatlands (2.8% vs. 0.6%) from 2001 to 2018. Recurrent burning was more prominent in Kalimantan than Sumatra. Average fire-return intervals (FRI) in peatlands of both regions were short, 28 and 45 years for Kalimantan and Sumatra, respectively. On average, forest FRI were less than 50 years. In non-forest areas, Kalimantan had shorter average FRI than Sumatra (13 years vs. 40 years), with ferns/low shrub areas burning most frequently. Our findings highlight the significant influence of LULC change in altering fire regimes. If prevalent rates of burning in Indonesia’s peatlands are not greatly reduced, peat swamp forest will disappear from Sumatra and Kalimantan in the coming decades.

Satellite-based burned area products are accurate for many regions. However, only limited assessments exist for Indonesia despite extensive burning and globally important carbon emissions. We evaluated the accuracy of four MODIS-derived (moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer) burned area products (MCD45A1 collection 5.1, MCD64A1 (collection 5.1 and 6), FireCCI51), and their sensitivity to burned-area size and temporal window length used for detection. The products were compared to reference burned areas from SPOT 5 imagery using error matrices and linear regressions. The MCD45A1 product detected <1% of burned areas. The other products detected 38%–48% of burned area with accuracies increasing modestly (45%–57%) when smaller burns (<100 ha) were excluded, with MCD64A1 C6 performing best. Except for the MCD45 product, linear regressions showed generally good agreement in peatlands (R ² ranging from 0.6 to 0.8) but detections were less accurate in non-peatlands (R ² ranging from 0.2 to 0.5). Despite having higher spatial resolution, the FireCCI51 product (250 m) showed lower accuracy (OE = 0.55–0.88, CE = 0.33–0.50) than the 500 m MCD64A1 C6 product (OE = 0.43–0.79, CE = 0.36–0.51) but it was comparable to the C5.1 product (OE = 0.52–0.91, CE = 0.37–0.67). Dense clouds and smoke limited the accuracies of all burned area products, even when the temporal window for detection was lengthened. This study shows that emissions calculations based on burned area in peatlands remain highly uncertain. Given the globally significant amount of emissions from burning peatlands, specific attention is required to improve burned area mapping in these regions in order for global emissions models to accurately reflect when, where, and how much emissions are occurring.