Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) is an advanced interventional therapy for patients with intermediate–high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) who deteriorated on anticoagulation or for high-risk patients for whom systemic thrombolysis is contraindicated. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of this therapy with a focus on the improvement of vital signs and laboratory parameters. Seventy-nine patients with intermediate–high-risk PE were treated with USAT from August 2020 to November 2022. The therapy significantly decreased the mean RV/LV ratio from 1.2 ± 0.22 to 0.9 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001) as well as the mean PAPs from 48.6 ± 11 to 30.1 ± 9.0 mmHg (p < 0.001). The respiratory and heart rate decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Serum creatinine decreased significantly from 1.0 ± 0.35 to 0.9 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001). There were 12 access-associated complications, which could be treated conservatively. One patient had haemothorax after the therapy and had to be operated on. USAT is an effective therapy for patients with intermediate–high-risk PE, with favourable hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory outcomes.

Background: Due to advances in interventional cardiology in recent years, more and more patients are currently receiving cardiac devices, with a subsequent increase in the number of patients with device-associated endocarditis. Device-associated endocarditis is a life-threatening disease with special diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Interventional devices for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure have been available for several years. However, there have been very few case reports of LAA closure device–associated endocarditis. Case summary: An 83-year-old woman presented with fever and fatigue. She had a history of permanent atrial fibrillation and recurrent bleeding on oral anticoagulation. Consequently, the patient underwent interventional LAA closure ∼20 months earlier. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus. Transoesophageal echocardiography revealed an LAA closure device–associated mobile, echo-dense mass that was consistent with infectious vegetation in this clinical context. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was started, and our heart team recommended complete removal of the device, which the patient refused. The patient subsequently died as a result of progressive endocarditis and multiple pre-existing co-morbidities. Discussion: Left atrial appendage occlusion device–associated endocarditis has rarely been reported. Due to the increase in LAA closure device implantation, device-associated endocarditis is expected to increase in the future. Transoesophageal echocardiography is required for correct diagnosis. Our case report suggests that an infection can occur long after implantation.

Background: Ultrasound‐assisted thrombolysis (USAT) and large‐bore‐thrombectomy (LBT) are under investigation for the treatment of intermediate‐high and high‐risk pulmonary embolisms (PE). Comparative studies investigating both devices are scarce.Aims: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the two most frequently used devices for treatment of acute PE.Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 125 patients undergoing LBT or USAT for intermediate‐ or high‐risk PE between 2019 and 2023. Nearest neighbor propensity matching with logistic regression was used to achieve balance on potential confounders. The primary outcome was the change in the right to left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio between baseline and 24 h.Results: A total of 125 patients were included. After propensity score matching, 95 patients remained in the sample, of which 69 (73%) underwent USAT and 26 (27%) LBT. The RV/LV ratio decrease between baseline and 24 h was greater in the LBT than in the USAT group (adjusted between‐group difference: −0.10, 95% CI: −0.16 to −0.04; p = 0.001). Both procedures were safe and adverse events occurred rarely (10% following USAT vs. 4% following LBT; p = 0.439).Conclusion: In acute intermediate‐high and high‐risk PE, both LBT and USAT were feasible and safe. The reduction in RV/LV ratio was greater following LBT than USAT. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cardiovascular disease. Elderly patients with acute PE have very high mortality rates. Data concerning the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) in this age group are lacking. Methods: Nineteen octogenarians with acute pulmonary embolism underwent USAT between August 2020 and February 2023 at two centres in Germany and were retrospectively analysed. The main efficacy measures were the right ventricle to left ventricle diameter (RV/LV) ratio, systolic right ventricle function, and invasive and echocardiographic measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). The main safety measures were in-hospital death and the bleeding rate according to the GUSTO bleeding score. Results: USAT was associated with an improved RV/LV ratio (0.36 ± 0.29, p < 0.001), systolic right ventricle function (5.0 ± 3.8, p < 0.001), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) at 24 h after therapy (24.2 ± 11.2 mmHg and 19 ± 13.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). No in-hospital deaths or bleeding complications occurred. Conclusions: USAT with EKOS^TM may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for octogenarians with acute pulmonary embolism.

Background: Postoperative patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism. They typically exhibit multiple contributing factors such as comorbidities, immobility, blood loss, increased hematocrit, dehydration, long hospital stays, and a higher bleeding risk. PE management in this vulnerable group is challenging. Although current guidelines provide differing recommendations, many clinical questions remain unanswered. Decisions regarding periprocedural anticoagulation management must balance the thromboembolic and procedural higher bleeding risks. In addition, a recent major surgery is an absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis. Small doses of local lytics or a mechanical percutaneous embolectomy in the era of catheter-based therapy may be a safer option. However, the safety and efficacy of CDT have not been evaluated in this particular PE-vulnerable population. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 35 postoperative patients with intermediate–high-risk PE treated with the EkoSonic Endovascular System. Operative bleeding risk, different management modalities, and post-PE-therapy presumptive complications were assessed before PE treatment. Results: Procedural success was achieved in 100% of cases. We observed a marked improvement in clinical and PE hemodynamics. One major bleeding, defined as life-threatening, required surgical intervention; four moderate bleedings, defined as bleeding without hemodynamic compromise, required intervention such as drainage. Minor bleeding was managed conservatively. Conclusions: Catheter-directed therapies may be an alternative to systemic reperfusion therapies for selected postoperative intermediate–high-risk PE-vulnerable populations.

Background. Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with intermediate–high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). In all studies investigating USAT in the setting of PE, the recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) alteplase or actilyse was used. Currently, there is a shortage of alteplase (Alteplase, Boehringer Ingelheim) in Europe. It is unknown whether the efficacy of urokinase (UK) is comparable with alteplase for USAT in patients with PE. Methods. Patients with intermediate–high-risk PE undergoing USAT with urokinase and alteplase were included in this study. One-to-one nearest neighbour matching was performed to account for baseline differences. We identified one patient treated with USAT and UK (n = 9) for each patient treated with USAT and alteplase (n = 9). Results. A total of 56 patients underwent USAT. The treatment was successful in all patients. The propensity score matched the identified nine pairs of patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the change in right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio (0.4 ± 0.3 versus 0.5 ± 0.4, p = 0.54), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (17.3 ± 8.0 versus 18.1 ± 8.1, p = 0.17), or improvement of RV function (5.8 ± 3.8 versus 5.1 ± 2.6, p = 1.0). The complication rates were comparable (11% in both groups, p = 0.55). There were no deaths in hospital or during 90 days in either group. Conclusions. In this case-matched comparison, the short-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes showed comparable results between USAT–UK and USAT–rt-PA.