Dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, tofogliflozin, selective inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), is used clinically to reduce circulation glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by blocking the reabsorption of glucose by the kidneys. Dapagliflozin is metabolized and inactivated by UGT1A9. Empagliflozin is metabolized and inactivated by UGT1A9 and by other related isoforms UGT2B7, UGT1A3, and UGT1A8. Tofogliflozin is metabolized and inactivated by five different enzymes CYP2C18, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP4A11, and CYP4F3. Dapagliflozin treatment of HCT116 cells, which express SGLT2 but not UGT1A9, results in the loss of cell adhesion, whereas HepG2 cells, which express both SGLT2 and UGT1A9, are resistant to the adhesion-related effects of dapagliflozin. PANC-1 and H1792 cells, which do not express either SGLT2 or UGT1A9, are also resistant to adhesion related effects of dapagliflozin. On the other hand, either empagliflozin or tofogliflozin treatment of HCT116, HepG2, PANC-1, and H1792 cells are resistant to the adhesion-related effects as observed in dapagliflozin treated HCT116 cells. Knockdown of UGT1A9 by shRNA in HepG2 cells increased dapagliflozin sensitivity, whereas the overexpression of UGT1A9 in HCT116 cells protected against dapagliflozin-dependent loos of cell adhesion. Dapagliflozin treatment had no effect on cellular interactions with fibronectin, vitronectin, or laminin, but it induced a loss of interaction with collagen I and IV. In parallel, dapagliflozin treatment reduced protein levels of the full-length discoidin domain receptor I (DDR1), concomitant with appearance of DDR1 cleavage products and ectodomain shedding of DDR1. In line with these observations, unmetabolized dapagliflozin increased ADAM10 activity. Dapagliflozin treatment also significantly reduced Y792 tyrosine phosphorylation of DDR1 leading to decrement of DDR1 function and detachment of cancer cells. Concomitant with these lines of results, we experienced that CEA in patients with colon cancer, which express SGLT2 but not UGT1A9, and type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by dapagliflozin in addition to chemotherapy was decreased (case 1). CEA in patients with colon cancer, which express SGLT2 but not UGT1A9, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was treated by dapagliflozin alone after radiation therapy was decreased but started to rise after cessation of dapagliflozin (case 2). CA19-9 in two of patients with pancreatic cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus was resistant to the combination therapy of dapagliflozin and chemotherapy (case 3 and 4 respectively). PIVKAII in patients with liver cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and CYFRA in patients with squamous lung cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus was also resistant the combination therapy of dapagliflozin and chemotherapy (case 5 and 6 respectively). Taken together, these data suggest a potential role for dapagliflozin anticancer therapy against colon cancer cells that express SGLT2, but not UGT1A9.

In the present study we examined the efficacy of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on improvement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in comparison with the renal threshold for glucose reabsorption in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients visited the hospital once a month for a regular follow‐up examination with the determination of blood glucose and HbA1c levels, and urinary glucose concentration from spot urine samples. Patient samples were compared before and after ipragliflozin administration. We defined the renal threshold for glucose reabsorption as the lowest blood glucose level that correlated with the first detectable appearance of urine glucose. These data showed a significant negative correlation between improvement of HbA1c level and renal threshold for glucose reabsorption in patients treated with the sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. These findings show that patients who have a higher renal threshold for glucose reabsorption can be expected to more effectively respond to sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy in terms of lowering HbA1c levels.

Tctex1d2 (Tctex1 domain containing 2) is an open reading frame that encodes for a functionally unknown protein that contains a Tctex1 domain found in dynein light chain family members. Examination of gene expression during adipogenesis demonstrated a marked increase in Tctex1d2 protein expression that was essentially undetectable in preadipocytes and markedly induced during 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Tctex1d2 overexpression significantly inhibited insulin-stimulated glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation and 2-deoxyglucose uptake. In contrast, Tctex1d2 knockdown significantly increased insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation and 2-deoxyglucose uptake. However, acute insulin stimulation (up to 30 min) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes with overexpression or knockdown of Tctex1d2 had no effect on Akt phosphorylation, a critical signal transduction target required for GLUT4 translocation. Although overexpression of Tctex1d2 had no significant effect on GLUT4 internalization, Tctex1d2 was found to associate with syntaxin 4 in an insulin-dependent manner and inhibit Doc2b binding to syntaxin 4. In addition, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide rescued the Tctex1d2 inhibition of insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation by suppressing the Tctex1d2-syntaxin 4 interaction and increasing Doc2b-Synatxin4 interactions. Taking these results together, we hypothesized that Tctex1d2 is a novel syntaxin 4 binding protein that functions as a negative regulator of GLUT4 plasma membrane translocation through inhibition of the Doc2b-syntaxin 4 interaction.

Brief refeeding times (~60 min) enhanced hepatic Angptl8 expression in fasted mice. We cloned the mouse Angptl8 promoter region to characterise this rapid refeeding-induced increase in hepatic Angptl8 expression. Deletion of the −309/−60 promoter region significantly attenuated basal promoter activity in hepatocytes. A computational motif search revealed a potential binding motif for hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α/1β (HNF-1α/β) at −84/−68 bp of the promoter. Mutation of the HNF-1 binding site significantly decreased the promoter activity in hepatocytes, and the promoter carrying the mutated HNF-1 site was not transactivated by co-transfection of HNF-1 in a non-hepatic cell line. Silencing Hnf-1 in hepatoma cells and mouse primary hepatocytes reduced Angptl8 protein levels. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays confirmed direct binding of Hnf-1 to its Angptl8 promoter binding motif. Hnf-1α expression levels increased after short-term refeeding, paralleling the enhanced in vivo expression of the Angptl8 protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) confirmed the recruitment of endogenous Hnf-1 to the Angptl8 promoter region. Insulin-treated primary hepatocytes showed increased expression of Angptl8 protein, but knockdown of Hnf-1 completely abolished this enhancement. HNF-1 appears to play essential roles in the rapid refeeding-induced increases in Angptl8 expression. HNF-1α may therefore represent a primary medical target for ANGPTL8-related metabolic abnormalities. The study revealed the transcriptional regulation of the mouse hepatic Angptl8 gene by HNF-1.