Stephen B. Stanfill

Mr. Stephen B. Stanfill


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2010 in Tobacco Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSStephen B. Stanfill
Stephen B. Stanfill
GCGregory N Connolly
Gregory N Connolly
LZLiqin Zhang
Liqin Zhang
LJLily T Jia
Lily T Jia
JHJack E Henningfield
Jack E Henningfield
CWClifford H Watson
Clifford H Watson
Objective: Oral tobacco products contain nicotine and carcinogenic tobacco-specificN-nitrosamines (TSNAs) that can be absorbed through the oral mucosa. The aim of this study was to determine typical pH ranges and concentrations of total nicotine, unionised nicotine (the most readily absorbed form) and five TSNAs in selected oral tobacco products distributed globally.Methods: A total of 53 oral tobacco products from 5 World Health Organisation (WHO) regions were analysed for total nicotine and TSNAs, including 4-(methyl-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), using gas chromatography or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. Unionised nicotine concentrations were calculated using product pH and total nicotine concentrations. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to help categorise or characterise some products.Results: Total nicotine content varied from 0.16 to 34.1 mg/g product, whereas, the calculated unionised nicotine ranged from 0.05 to 31.0 mg/g product; a 620-fold range of variation. Products ranged from pH 5.2 to 10.1, which translates to 0.2% to 99.1% of nicotine being in the unionised form. Some products have very high pH and correspondingly high unionised nicotine (eg, gul powder, chimó, toombak) and/or high TSNA (eg, toombak, zarda, khaini) concentrations. The concentrations of TSNAs spanned five orders of magnitude with concentrations of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) ranging from 4.5 to 516 000 ng/g product.Conclusions: These data have important implications for risk assessment because they show that very different exposure risks may be posed through the use of these chemically diverse oral tobacco products. Because of the wide chemical variation, oral tobacco products should not be categorised together when considering the public health implications of their use.

1 February 2003 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStephen B. Stanfill
Stephen B. Stanfill
ACA.M Calafat
A.M Calafat
CBC.R Brown
C.R Brown
GPG.M Polzin
G.M Polzin
JCJ.M Chiang
J.M Chiang
DAD.L Ashley
D.L Ashley

1 August 2015 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStephen B. Stanfill
Stephen B. Stanfill
ASAndré Luiz Oliveira da Silva
André Luiz Oliveira da Silva
JLJoseph G. Lisko
Joseph G. Lisko
TLTameka S. Lawler
Tameka S. Lawler
PKPeter Kuklenyik
Peter Kuklenyik
CWClifford H. Watson
Clifford H. Watson

1 August 2018 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStephen B. Stanfill
Stephen B. Stanfill
RCRay E. Croucher
Ray E. Croucher
PGPrakash C. Gupta
Prakash C. Gupta
JLJoseph G. Lisko
Joseph G. Lisko
TLTameka S. Lawler
Tameka S. Lawler
CWClifford H. Watson
Clifford H. Watson

6 October 2006 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStephen B. Stanfill
Stephen B. Stanfill
CBCandace R. Brown
Candace R. Brown
XYXizheng (Jane) Yan
Xizheng (Jane) Yan
CWClifford Watson
Clifford Watson
David AshleyDavid Ashley
David Ashley