Han-Seok Seo

Dr. Han-Seok Seo

Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in Ecological Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEllen Van Loo
Ellen Van Loo
VCVincenzina Caputo
Vincenzina Caputo
RNRodolfo M. Nayga
Rodolfo M. Nayga
Han-Seok SeoHan-Seok Seo
Han-Seok Seo
BZBaoyue Zhang
Baoyue Zhang
WVWim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke

2 January 2008 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKatja Aschenbrenner
Katja Aschenbrenner
CHCornelia Hummel
Cornelia Hummel
KTKatja Teszmer
Katja Teszmer
FKFranziska Krone
Franziska Krone
TITadashi Ishimaru
Tadashi Ishimaru
THThomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel

20 September 2014 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAgnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska
VSV. A. Schriever
V. A. Schriever
VGV. Gudziol
V. Gudziol
CHC. Hummel
C. Hummel
AHA. Hähner
A. Hähner
THT. Hummel
T. Hummel
The currently presented large dataset (n = 1,422) consists of results that have been assembled over the last 8 years at science fairs using the 16-item odor identification part of the “Sniffin’ Sticks”. In this context, the focus was on olfactory function in children; in addition before testing, we asked participants to rate their olfactory abilities and the patency of the nasal airways. We reinvestigated some simple questions, e.g., differences in olfactory odor identification abilities in relation to age, sex, self-ratings of olfactory function and nasal patency. Three major results evolved: first, consistent with previously published reports, we found that identification scores of the youngest and the oldest participants were lower than the scores obtained by people aged 20–60. Second, we observed an age-related increase in the olfactory abilities of children. Moreover, the self-assessed olfactory abilities were related to actual performance in the smell test, but only in adults, and self-assessed nasal patency was not related to the “Sniffin’ Sticks” identification score.

22 July 2009 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ICIlona Croy
Ilona Croy
DBDorothee Buschhüter
Dorothee Buschhüter
Han-Seok SeoHan-Seok Seo
Han-Seok Seo
SNSimona Negoias
Simona Negoias
THThomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel

1 January 2013 in Neuropsychologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAArtin Arshamian
Artin Arshamian
EIEmilia Iannilli
Emilia Iannilli
JGJohannes C. Gerber
Johannes C. Gerber
JWJohan Willander
Johan Willander
JPJonas Persson
Jonas Persson
MLMaria Larsson
Maria Larsson

16 December 2010 in Chemical Senses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Han-Seok SeoHan-Seok Seo
Han-Seok Seo
THThomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel
Even though we often perceive odors while hearing auditory stimuli, surprisingly little is known about auditory–olfactory integration. This study aimed to investigate the influence of auditory cues on ratings of odor intensity and/or pleasantness, with a focus on 2 factors: “congruency” (Experiment 1) and the “halo/horns effect” of auditory pleasantness (Experiment 2). First, in Experiment 1, participants were presented with congruent, incongruent, or neutral sounds before and during the presentation of odor. Participants rated the odors as being more pleasant while listening to a congruent sound than while listening to an incongruent sound. In Experiment 2, participants received pleasant or unpleasant sounds before and during the presentation of either a pleasant or unpleasant odor. The hedonic valence of the sounds transferred to the odors, irrespective of the hedonic tone of the odor itself. The more the participants liked the preceding sound, the more pleasant the subsequent odor became. In contrast, the ratings of odor intensity appeared to be little or not at all influenced by the congruency or hedonic valence of the auditory cue. In conclusion, the present study for the first time provides an empirical demonstration that auditory cues can modulate odor pleasantness.