Multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual, has emerged as a worldwide public health concern contributing to mortality and morbidity. This complex health phenomenon is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, particularly as populations continue to age. Despite the growing burden of multimorbidity, the development and implementation of interventions published by scholars are still in their early stages with significant variability in strategies and outcomes. The variability in strategy and outcome may result from factors such as lack of infrastructure, socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors. The review aims to synthesize interventions designed to manage and mitigate multimorbidity and explore a range of approaches, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, care coordination models, and technological innovations. The scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. It included 1,553,877 individuals with multimorbidity with no age restriction; in the studies that included gender difference, 463,339 male participants and 1,091,538 female participants were involved. Multimorbidity interventions were defined as strategies or programs designed to manage and improve the health and quality of life of individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Of the downloaded articles, those that met the inclusion criteria were published between 2012 and 2024. The final analysis included 100 articles from 3119 published articles, which resulted in 9 themes and 15 subthemes. Themes on the need for lifestyle and behavioural interventions, patient empowerment and engagement, multimorbidity management, health integration, pharmacotherapy optimization, community and policy interventions, healthcare system improvements, technology and digital health, as well as research and evidence-based practice interventions, emerged. The reviewed literature emphasizes the necessity of multidisciplinary approaches to effectively combat the growing public health challenge of multimorbidity.

Obesity is a growing epidemic that threatens to deplete healthcare resources by increasing the prevalence of diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer, and chronic kidney disease. The prevalence of general and central obesity among the rural Black population in Limpopo Province is high; however, few studies have evaluated the association between obesity and its comorbidities among the rural Black population, and, hence, this study aims to determine the relationship between obesity and associated comorbidities. This study was cross-sectional and retrospective in design, using secondary data from the Africa Wits-INDEPTH Partnership for Genomic (AWI-Gen) research phase 1 study. A sample size of 791 participants was collected conveniently. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 27 (SPSS). A chi-square, unpaired Student’s t-test, bivariate and partial correlation, and multivariate regression analysis were used for analysis. General obesity correlated positively and significantly with LDL-C/HDL-C ratio and hypertension, while central obesity correlated positively and significantly with diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, and TC/HDL-C ratio. In the present study, obese participants were more likely to be hypertensive, and have an increased LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. Centrally obese participants were more likely to be diabetic, hypertensive, have dyslipidaemia, and exhibit reduced kidney function.

Background: Pregnant teenagers have been reported to have an increased likelihood of experiencing depression than their non-pregnant peers. There is little research on the risk factors for depression in rural Black adolescents and young adults, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, the current study aimed to identify the prevalence of probable depression and associated factors amongst pregnant and parenting young females.Method: The study was a cross-sectional design, consisting of 362 pregnant and parenting adolescents and young adults aged 14–22. The study used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to measure probable depression. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS, version 27.0.Results: The study found that the overall prevalence of probable depression was 42.8%. The study also found a relationship between alcohol consumption, lack of financial support, unplanned pregnancy, and probable depression in pregnant and parenting adolescents. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy in the present study was 81.8%.Conclusion: Furthermore, the present study indicated that participants from low socio-economic status families and those who were HIV positive were at a greater risk of depression in both groups. Therefore, we recommend that measures be put in place for early detection and treatment of depression and that social support be given to adolescent mothers.

Sociodemographic factors affect how metabolic syndrome (MetS) manifests and progresses. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence between MetS and sociodemographic factors among adult participants in the Dikgale HDSS. This was a comprehensive retrospective study where the records of 575 participants were meticulously evaluated. MetS was defined using a joint interim statement (JIS). The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for SPSS, version 25. A chi-square test was used to compare proportions between groups, with Cramer’s V used to assess the strength of association. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between MetS and sociodemographic profiles. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The prevalence of MetS was 28.2% (females 33.3% vs. males 15.6%, p ≤ 0.001). In addition, logistic regression showed males to have lower odds of MetS as compared to females (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.2–0.6, and AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.6). The 55–60 age group had the highest proportion of affected individuals, and MetS was also more common among individuals with low educational attainment. In addition, on regression, the same association was observed. This study found sociodemographic disparities in MetS among rural adults, especially females, who had an increased risk of MetS, and participants with low educational attainment.

Background Multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual, has emerged as a worldwide public health concern contributing to mortality and morbidity. With a prevalence estimated at 37% globally, this complex health phenomenon is increasingly affecting populations as they age. Despite the growing burden of multimorbidity, the development and implementation of interventions published by scholars are still in their early stages with significant variability in strategies and outcomes. Objectives The review aims to synthesize interventions designed to manage and mitigate multimorbidity and explore a range of approaches, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, care coordination models, and technological innovations. Methods The scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. It included about 1,227,906 individuals with multimorbidity, with 199,413 being male (16.2%) and 1,028,493 (83.8%) female participants. Multimorbidity interventions were defined as strategies or programs designed to manage and improve the health and quality of life of individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Results The final analysis included 101 articles from 3119 published between 2012 and 2024. Themes on the need for lifestyle and behavioural interventions, patient empowerment and engagement, multimorbidity management, health integration, pharmacotherapy optimization, community and policy interventions, healthcare system improvements, technology and digital health, as well as research and evidence-based practice interventions, emerged. Conclusion The reviewed literature emphasizes the necessity of multidisciplinary approaches to effectively combat the escalating pandemic of multimorbidity.