Smith, RW, Housh, TJ, Anders, JPV, Neltner, TJ, Arnett, JE, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. Application of the ratings of perceived exertion-clamp model to examine the effects of joint angle on the time course of torque and neuromuscular responses during a sustained, isometric forearm flexion to task failure. J Strength Cond Res 37(5): 1023–1033, 2023—The present study used the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE)-clamp model during a sustained, isometric forearm flexion task to failure to determine the effects of joint angle on torque and neuromuscular responses. Twelve college-aged women performed two 3-second maximal voluntary isometric contractions at elbow joint angles (EJ) of 75°, 100°, and 125° before sustained, isometric, forearm flexions anchored to RPE = 7 to task failure (defined as RPE > 7, or the torque was reduced to zero) at EJ₇₅, EJ₁₀₀, and EJ₁₂₅. The amplitude (AMP) and frequency (MPF) of the electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) signals from the biceps brachii were recorded. Repeated-measures ANOVAs and post hoc comparisons were used to examine differences across time and between joint angles for torque and neuromuscular parameters. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. For each joint angle, there was a decrease (p < 0.05) in torque across the sustained, isometric task. Collapsed across joint angle, there were decreases (p < 0.001, = 0.378) in EMG AMP from 30 to 100% time to task failure. No changes were observed, however, for the other neuromuscular responses. The subjects voluntarily reduced torque to maintain RPE = 7 for each joint angle, and we hypothesize that RPE was maintained by afferent feedback from group III/IV motor neurons and corollary discharge (efferent copy of an internal signal that develops from central motor commands). The RPE-Clamp Model may be extended to athletes recovering from injury because a self-selected exercise intensity may be perceived as more enjoyable and promote adherence.

This study examined the effects of joint angle (JA) on maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and neuromuscular responses following fatiguing tasks anchored to RPE. Nine men (mean ± SD: age = 20.7 ± 1.2 yrs) performed forearm flexion MVICs at elbow JAs of 75° and 125° before and after sustained, isometric forearm flexion tasks to failure at fatiguing joint angles (FJA) of 75° and 125° anchored to RPE = 8. The amplitude and frequency of the electromyographic and mechanomyographic signals were recorded. Neuromuscular efficiency was calculated by dividing normalized torque by normalized electromyographic amplitude. A dependent t-test was used to assess the mean difference for time to task failure (TTF) between FJA. Repeated measure ANOVAs were used to assess mean differences for pre-test to post-test MVIC and neuromuscular responses. There was no significant difference between FJA for TTF (p = 0.223). The MVIC (collapsed across FJA and MVIC JA) decreased from pre-test to post-test (51.1 ± 5.0 vs. 45.3 ± 5.6 Nm, p < 0.001). Normalized neuromuscular parameters remained unchanged (p > 0.05). The FJA resulted in similar torque and neuromuscular responses, and the decreases in MVIC were not tracked by changes in the neuromuscular parameters. Thus, the neuromuscular parameters were not sensitive to fatigue, and pre-test to post-test measures may be compared between different FJA.

The present study examined the effect of anchor schemes on the time to task failure (TTF), performance fatigability, neuromuscular responses, and the perceived sensations that contributed to task termination following the sustained, isometric forearm flexion tasks. Eight women completed sustained, isometric forearm flexion tasks anchored to RPE = 8 (RPEFT) and the torque (TRQFT) that corresponded to RPE = 8. The subjects performed pre-test and post-test maximal isometric contractions to quantify performance fatigability and changes in electromyographic amplitude (EMG AMP) and neuromuscular efficiency (NME). In addition, the subjects completed a post-test questionnaire (PTQ) to quantify the contributions of perceived sensations to task termination. Repeated measure ANOVAs were used to assess the mean differences for TTF, performance fatigability, and neuromuscular responses. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests were used to assess the differences between anchor schemes for the average values from the PTQ item scores. For TTF, the RPEFT was longer than the TRQFT (174.9 ± 85.6 vs. 65.6 ± 68.0 s; p = 0.006). Collapsed across the anchor scheme, there were decreases in torque (23.7 ± 5.5 Nm vs. 19.6 ± 4.9 Nm; p < 0.001) and NME (1.00 ± 0.00 vs. 0.76 ± 0.15; p = 0.003). There were no significant (p > 0.577) changes for EMG AMP. For the PTQ, there were no differences (p > 0.05) between anchor schemes. There were, however, inter-individual differences in the response scores. The current findings indicated that performance fatigability was likely due to peripheral fatigue (based on NME), not central fatigue (based on EMG AMP). Furthermore, the use of a PTQ may serve as a simple tool to assess the contributions of perceived sensations to task termination.