Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL)-based systems have gained wide interest in macular disorders, including diabetic macular edema (DME). This paper aims to validate an AI algorithm for identifying and quantifying different major optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers in DME eyes by comparing the algorithm to human expert manual examination. Intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) detection and volumes, external limiting-membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, and hyperreflective retina foci (HRF) quantification were analyzed. Three-hundred three DME eyes were included. The mean central subfield thickness was 386.5 ± 130.2 µm. IRF was present in all eyes and confirmed by AI software. The agreement (kappa value) (95% confidence interval) for SRF presence and ELM and EZ interruption were 0.831 (0.738–0.924), 0.934 (0.886–0.982), and 0.936 (0.894–0.977), respectively. The accuracy of the automatic quantification of IRF, SRF, ELM, and EZ ranged between 94.7% and 95.7%, while accuracy of quality parameters ranged between 99.0% (OCT layer segmentation) and 100.0% (fovea centering). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between clinical and automated HRF count was excellent (0.97). This AI algorithm provides a reliable and reproducible assessment of the most relevant OCT biomarkers in DME. It may allow clinicians to routinely identify and quantify these parameters, offering an objective way of diagnosing and following DME eyes.

The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarker strictly associated with visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) whose pathophysiology is still unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize in vivo, using retinal imaging and liquid biopsy, DRIL in eyes with DME. This was an observational cross-sectional study. Patients affected by center-involved DME were enrolled. All patients underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and proteomic analysis of aqueous humor (AH). The presence of DRIL at OCT was analyzed by two masked retinal experts. Fifty-seven biochemical biomarkers were analyzed from AH samples. Nineteen eyes of nineteen DME patients were enrolled. DRIL was present in 10 patients (52.63%). No statistically significant difference was found between DME eyes with and without DRIL, considering the AH concentration of all the analyzed biomarkers except for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a biomarker of Müller cells dysfunction (p = 0.02). In conclusion, DRIL, in DME eyes, seems to strictly depend on a major dysfunction of Müller cells, explaining its role not only as imaging biomarker, but also as visual function Müller cells-related parameter.

Background: Hyperreflective retinal foci (HRF) are small, discrete, hyperreflective elements observed in the retina using optical coherence tomography (OCT). They appear in many retinal diseases and have been linked to disease progression, treatment response, and prognosis. However, their definition and clinical use vary widely, not just between different diseases, but also within a single disorder. Methods: This perspective is based on a review of peer-reviewed studies examining HRF across different retinal diseases. The studies included analyzed HRF morphology, distribution, and clinical relevance using OCT. Particular attention was given to histopathological correlations, disease-specific patterns, and advancements in automated quantification methods. Results: HRF distribution and features vary with disease type and even within the same disease. A variety of descriptions have been proposed with different characteristics in terms of dimensions, reflectivity, location, and association with back shadowing. Automated OCT analysis has enhanced HRF detection, enabling quantitative analysis that may expand their use in clinical practice. However, differences in software and methods can lead to inconsistent results between studies. HRF have been linked to microglial cells and may be defined as neuro-inflammatory cells (Inflammatory, I-HRF), migrating retinal pigment epithelium cells (Pigmentary, P-HRF), blood vessels (Vascular, V-HRF), and deposits of proteinaceous or lipid elements leaking from vessels (Exudative, E-HRF). Conclusions: HRF are emerging as valuable imaging biomarkers in retinal diseases. Four main types have been identified, with different morphological features, pathophysiological origin, and, therefore, different implications in the management of retinal diseases. Advances in imaging and computational analysis are promising for their incorporation into personalized treatment strategies.

Aim: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) represents the main cause of vision loss among working age people. A prompt screening of this condition may prevent its worst complications. This study aims to validate the in-built artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm Selena+ of a handheld fundus camera (Optomed Aurora, Optomed, Oulu, Finland) in a first line screening of a real-world clinical setting. Methods: It was an observational cross-sectional study including 256 eyes of 256 consecutive patients. The sample included both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Each patient received a 50°, macula centered, non-mydriatic fundus photography and, after pupil dilation, a complete fundus examination by an experienced retina specialist. All images were after analyzed by a skilled operator and by the AI algorithm. The results of the three procedures were then compared. Results: The agreement between the operator-based fundus analysis in bio-microscopy and the fundus photographs was of 100%. Among the DR patients the AI algorithm revealed signs of DR in 121 out of 125 subjects (96.8%) and no signs of DR 122 of the 126 non-diabetic patients (96.8%). The sensitivity of the AI algorithm was 96.8% and the specificity 96.8%. The overall concordance coefficient k (95% CI) between AI-based assessment and fundus biomicroscopy was 0.935 (0.891–0.979). Conclusions: The Aurora fundus camera is effective in a first line screening of DR. Its in-built AI software can be considered a reliable tool to automatically identify the presence of signs of DR and therefore employed as a promising resource in large screening campaigns.

Purpose: To characterize, using clustering analysis, the OCT morphological and clinical phenotypes of diabetic macular edema (DME) in a very large population (>2000 DME eyes) using standardized and validated OCT-based biomarkers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on OCT scans collected from 2355 eyes of 1688 patients with DME and performed during real-world clinical practice. OCT scans were automatically analyzed by a software able to automatically quantify OCT key biomarkers: intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), hyperreflective retinal foci (I-HRF), and external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) interruption. Clustering analysis was performed using the above-mentioned biomarkers, including the distribution of IRF across the three ETDRS rings. Results: The overall population was predominantly composed of type 2 diabetes patients (89%), with a mean diabetes duration of 15.6 ± 10.7 years and mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 63 ± 18 ETDRS letters. Multivariate clustering identified four morphological phenotypes with distinct patterns of fluid distribution associated with different I-HRF counts, SRF volume, and percentages of ELM/EZ integrity (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This large OCT analysis identified distinct morphological subtypes of DME, confirming the clinical relevance of key imaging biomarkers. The distribution and severity of DME features differ among clusters, supporting the importance of OCT-based phenotyping in tailoring treatment strategies and understanding disease evolution.