François Cauchy

Dr. François Cauchy

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nicolas potéNicolas poté
Nicolas poté
FCFrançois Cauchy
François Cauchy
MAMiguel ALBUQUERQUE
Miguel ALBUQUERQUE
HVHélène Voitot
Hélène Voitot
JBJacques Belghiti
Jacques Belghiti
VPValérie Paradis
Valérie Paradis

1 November 2013 in HPB
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSafi Dokmak
Safi Dokmak
FFFadhel Samir Ftériche
Fadhel Samir Ftériche
RBRené Borscheid
René Borscheid
FCFrançois Cauchy
François Cauchy
OFOlivier Farges
Olivier Farges
JBJacques Belghiti
Jacques Belghiti
Objectives Recent improvements in surgical technique have extended the indications for liver resection. The aims of this study were to assess whether this extension is associated with a changing patient profile and to evaluate how this potential shift has influenced mortality after liver resection in order to define standard expectations for hepatectomy. Methods The characteristics and postoperative outcomes of all patients undergoing elective hepatectomy from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with mortality in the subgroup of patients with malignant disease. Results Among the 2012 patients in whom hepatectomies were performed, the percentage of patients operated for malignancy increased from 66.4% in 2000 to 82.3% in 2009 (P < 0.001). These patients experienced higher mortality (4.5% versus 0.7%; P < 0.001), were significantly older, and displayed greater comorbidity and underlying parenchymal disease compared with those with benign lesions. Mortality over the entire study period was 3.5% and was fairly stable, dropping from 3.8% in 2000 to 3.1% in 2009 (P = 0.686). On multivariate analysis, age of >60 years, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥3, major resection, vascular procedure, severe fibrosis (F3–F4) and steatosis of >30% were associated with increased mortality in patients with malignant disease. Conclusions The profile of patients undergoing liver resection has changed and now includes more high-risk patients with diseased parenchyma undergoing major hepatectomy for malignancy. This change in patient profile is responsible for the stability in mortality rates over the years.

1 June 2015 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOlivier Soubrane
Olivier Soubrane
LSLilian Schwarz
Lilian Schwarz
FCFrançois Cauchy
François Cauchy
LPLaura Ornella Perotto
Laura Ornella Perotto
RBRaffaele Brustia
Raffaele Brustia
OSOlivier Scatton
Olivier Scatton
Objective: To evaluate a new conceptual technique of laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Background: Despite significant improvements in surgical care in the last decades, morbidity is still high after major hepatectomy. Blood loss and transfusions are known to significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications and cancer recurrence after liver resection. A laparoscopic approach may improve perioperative outcomes in these cases, but data in literature are limited and the surgical technique is not yet standardized. Methods: A new conceptual technique of right hepatectomy was designed using evidence-based facts and oncologic rules: laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum, low central venous pressure, intermittent pedicle clamping, anterior approach without mobilization, and parenchymal section with ultrasonic dissector. Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled between October 2011 and September 2013. Primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss. Results: Eighty percent of patients underwent surgery for malignant disease and cirrhosis was present in 11 patients. Benign lesions accounted for 13% of indications, whereas living liver donation was performed in 2 cases. Median blood loss was 100 mL (50–700) and transfusion rate was 7%. Five patients (16.6%) required conversion to laparotomy, including 2 using hybrid technique. The median operative time was 360 minutes (210–510). R0 resection rate was 87% (21/24). Postoperative morbidity rate was 23% (7/30) with 8 complications including 6 Clavien III-IV. No respiratory complication occurred. The median hospital stay was 8 days. No patient died. Conclusions: This study showed that several evidence-based facts could be combined to define a new conceptual technique of laparoscopic right hepatectomy allowing for low blood loss and morbidity.

1 February 2016 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFDavid Fuks
David Fuks
FCFrançois Cauchy
François Cauchy
SFSamir Ftériche
Samir Ftériche
TNTakeo Nomi
Takeo Nomi
LSLilian Schwarz
Lilian Schwarz
OSOlivier Soubrane
Olivier Soubrane
To compare both incidence and types of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) between laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) and open major hepatectomy (OMH). LMHs are increasingly performed. Yet, the benefits of laparoscopy over laparotomy regarding PPCs remain unknown. In this multi-institutional study, all patients undergoing OMH or LMH between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors for PPCs were analyzed on multivariate analysis. Comparison of both overall rate and types of PPCs between OMH and LMH patients was performed after propensity score adjustment on factors influencing the choice of the approach. LMH was performed in 226 (18.6%) of the 1214 included patients. PPCs occurred in 480 (39.5%) patients including symptomatic pleural effusion in 366 (30.1%) patients, respiratory insufficiency in 141 (11.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome in 84 (6.9%), pulmonary infection in 80 (6.5%), and pulmonary embolism in 47 (3.8%) patients. On multivariate analysis, preoperative hypoprotidemia [hazard ratio (HR): 1.341, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.001-1.795; P = 0.049], open approach (HR: 2.481, 95% CI: 1.141-6.024; P = 0.024), right-sided hepatectomy (HR: 2.143, 95% CI: 1.544-2.975; P < 0.001), concomitant extrahepatic procedures (HR: 1.742, 95% CI: 1.103-2.750; P = 0.017), transfusion (HR: 2.851, 95% CI: 2.067-3.935; P < 0.001), and operative time more than 6 hours (HR: 1.510, 95% CI: 1.127-2.022; P = 0.006) were independently associated with PPCs. After propensity score matching, the overall incidence of PPCs (13.2% vs 40.5%, P < 0.001), symptomatic pleural effusion (11.6% vs 26.4%, P = 0.003), pleural effusion requiring drainage (1.7% vs 9.9%, P = 0.006), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (1.7% vs 9.9%, P = 0.006) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in the open group. Pure laparoscopy allows reducing PPCs in patients requiring major liver resection.

1 November 2015 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOlivier Soubrane
Olivier Soubrane
OROlivier de Rougemont
Olivier de Rougemont
KKKi-Hun Kim
Ki-Hun Kim
BSBenjamin Samstein
Benjamin Samstein
NMNizam Mamode
Nizam Mamode
DCDaniel Cherqui
Daniel Cherqui
The aim of the study was to compare the short-term donor outcomes of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) for adult to child living donor liver transplantation (A-C LDLT) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Although laparoscopy has become the standard approach in kidney donors, its use remains limited and controversial in LLS for A-C LDLT due to the lack of conclusive assessment of procedure-related morbidity. From 2001 to 2014, 124 healthy donors undergoing laparoscopic LLLS for A-C LDLT at 5 tertiary referral centers in Europe, North America, and Asia, and 300 healthy donors undergoing LDN at 2 tertiary centers in Europe were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes of LLLS were compared with those of LDN including the use of the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Although liver donors experienced significantly less overall (16.9% vs 31.7%, P = 0.002) and grade 1 to 2 (12.1% vs 24.7%, P = 0.004) complications than kidney donors, the rates of major complication (≥ grade 3) were similar between the 2 groups. In both groups, donors experiencing postoperative complications had similar CCI (19.3 vs 21.9 for liver and kidney donors, respectively, P = 0.29). After propensity score analysis allowing for matching donors on age, sex, and body mass index, the postoperative outcomes remained comparable between the 2 groups. Laparoscopic LLS for A-C LDLT yields at least similar short-term donor outcomes as LDN. These results provide the first validation for a laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and suggest that the laparoscopic approach should be considered a new standard practice for retrieval of left lateral section liver grafts as it is for kidney donation.

1 January 2013 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrançois Cauchy
François Cauchy
SZS Zalinski
S Zalinski
SDS Dokmak
S Dokmak
DFD Fuks
D Fuks
OFO Farges
O Farges
JBJ Belghiti
J Belghiti
Background: The incidence of metabolic syndrome-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (MS-HCC) is increasing. However, the results following liver resection in this context have not been described in detail. Methods: Data for all patients with metabolic syndrome as a unique risk factor for HCC who underwent liver resection between 2000 and 2011 were retrieved retrospectively from an institutional database. Pathological analysis of the underlying parenchyma included fibrosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. Patients were classified as having normal or abnormal underlying parenchyma. Their characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 560 resections for HCC were performed in the study interval. Sixty-two patients with metabolic syndrome, of median age 70 (range 50–84) years, underwent curative hepatectomy for HCC, including 32 major resections (52 per cent). Normal underlying parenchyma was present in 24 patients (39 per cent). The proportion of resected HCCs labelled as MS-HCC accounted for more than 15 per cent of the entire HCC population in more recent years. Mortality and major morbidity rates were 11 and 58 per cent respectively. Compared with patients with normal underlying liver, patients with abnormal liver had increased rates of mortality (0 versus 18 per cent; P = 0·026) and major complications (13 versus 42 per cent; P = 0·010). In multivariable analysis, a non-severely fibrotic yet abnormal underlying parenchyma was a risk factor for major complications (hazard ratio 5·66, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·21 to 26·52; P = 0·028). The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 75 and 70 per cent respectively, and were not influenced by the underlying parenchyma. Conclusion: HCC in patients with metabolic syndrome is becoming more common. Liver resection is appropriate but carries a high risk, even in the absence of severe fibrosis. Favourable long-term outcomes justify refinements in the perioperative management of these patients.