Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic abnormalities of myeloid cells and peripheral cytopenias. Although genetic abnormalities underlie the pathogenesis of these disorders and their heterogeneity, current classifications of MDS rely predominantly on morphology. We performed genomic profiling of 3233 patients with MDS or related disorders to delineate molecular subtypes and define their clinical implications. Gene mutations, copy-number alterations, and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity were derived from targeted sequencing of a 152-gene panel, with abnormalities identified in 91%, 43%, and 11% of patients, respectively. We characterized 16 molecular groups, encompassing 86% of patients, using information from 21 genes, 6 cytogenetic events, and loss of heterozygosity at the TP53 and TET2 loci. Two residual groups defined by negative findings (molecularly not otherwise specified, absence of recurrent drivers) comprised 14% of patients. The groups varied in size from 0.5% to 14% of patients and were associated with distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes. The median bone marrow (BM) blast percentage across groups ranged from 1.5% to 10%, and the median overall survival ranged from 0.9 to 8.2 years. We validated 5 well-characterized entities, added further evidence to support 3 previously reported subsets, and described 8 novel groups. The prognostic influence of BM blasts depended on the genetic subtypes. Within genetic subgroups, therapy-related MDS and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms had comparable clinical and outcome profiles to primary MDS. In conclusion, genetically-derived subgroups of MDS are clinically relevant and might inform future classification schemas and translational therapeutic research.

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p < 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As reference, these results were compared with 4593 primary MDS (p-MDS) patients represented in the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database (IWG-PM). Although a less favorable clinical outcome occurred in each t-MDS subset compared with p-MDS subgroups, FAB and WHO-classification, IPSS-R, and WPSS-R separated t-MDS patients into differing risk groups effectively, indicating that all established risk factors for p-MDS maintained relevance in t-MDS, with cytogenetic features having enhanced predictive power. These data strongly argue to classify t-MDS as a separate entity distinct from other WHO-classified t-myeloid neoplasms, which would enhance treatment decisions and facilitate the inclusion of t-MDS patients into clinical studies.

Mutations in UBA1, which are disease-defining for VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, have been reported in patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we define the prevalence and clinical associations of UBA1 mutations in a representative cohort of patients with MDS. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction profiling of a selected cohort of 375 male patients lacking MDS disease-defining mutations or established World Health Organization (WHO) disease classification identified 28 patients (7%) with UBA1 p.M41T/V/L mutations. Using targeted sequencing of UBA1 in a representative MDS cohort (n = 2027), we identified an additional 27 variants in 26 patients (1%), which we classified as likely/pathogenic (n = 12) and of unknown significance (n = 15). Among the total 40 patients with likely/pathogenic variants (2%), all were male and 63% were classified by WHO 2016 criteria as MDS with multilineage dysplasia or MDS with single-lineage dysplasia. Patients had a median of 1 additional myeloid gene mutation, often in TET2 (n = 12), DNMT3A (n = 10), ASXL1 (n = 3), or SF3B1 (n = 3). Retrospective clinical review, where possible, showed that 82% (28/34) UBA1-mutant cases had VEXAS syndrome–associated diagnoses or inflammatory clinical presentation. The prevalence of UBA1 mutations in patients with MDS argues for systematic screening for UBA1 in the management of MDS.