Valentin Harter

Mr. Valentin Harter

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChristian PFISTER
Christian PFISTER
GGGwenaelle Gravis
Gwenaelle Gravis
AFAude Fléchon
Aude Fléchon
CCChristine Chevreau
Christine Chevreau
HMHakim Mahammedi
Hakim Mahammedi
FIfor the VESPER Trial Investigators
for the VESPER Trial Investigators
PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer is not defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2013 and March 2018, 500 patients were randomly assigned in 28 French centers and received either six cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) once every 2 weeks or four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) once every 3 weeks before surgery (neoadjuvant group) or after surgery (adjuvant group). We report the primary end point of the GETUG-AFU V05 VESPER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01812369 ): progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years. Secondary end points were time to progression and overall survival. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-seven patients (88%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 60% of patients received the planned six cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, 84% received four cycles in the GC arm, and thereafter, 91% and 90% of patients underwent surgery, respectively. Organ-confined response (< ypT3N0) was observed more frequently in the dd-MVAC arm (77% v 63%, P = .001). In the adjuvant group, 40% of patients received six cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, and 81% of patients received four cycles in the GC arm. For all patients in the clinical trial, 3-year PFS was improved in the dd-MVAC arm, but the study did not meet its primary end point (3-year rate: 64% v 56%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.02], P = .066); nevertheless, the dd-MVAC arm was associated with a significantly longer time to progression (3-year rate: 69% v 58%, HR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93], P = .014). In the neoadjuvant group, PFS at 3 years was significantly higher in the dd-MVAC arm (66% v 56%, HR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96], P = .025). CONCLUSION: In the VESPER trial, dd-MVAC improved 3-years PFS over GC. In the neoadjuvant group, a better bladder tumor local control and a significant improvement in 3-year PFS were observed in the dd-MVAC arm.

13 March 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCStéphane Culine
Stéphane Culine
VHValentin Harter
Valentin Harter
CKClémentine Krucker
Clémentine Krucker
GGGwenaelle Gravis
Gwenaelle Gravis
AFAude Fléchon
Aude Fléchon
CPChristian PFISTER
Christian PFISTER
Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In recent years, the VESPER trial showed a statistically significant higher progression-free survival with dd-MVAC (dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) compared to GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). In the present report, we refine the characterization and outcome of patients whose cystectomy specimens were pathologically free of cancer (pathological complete response, pCR). We confirm that these patients portend a better outcome as compared to patients with invasive disease (≥pT1N0) at cystectomy. Nested variant and lymphovascular invasion were identified as adverse predictive factors of pCR. Progression-free survival probability three years after pCR on cystectomy was about 85%, regardless of the NAC regimen. A lower creatinine clearance and the delivery of less than four cycles were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Predicting the efficacy of NAC remains a major challenge. The planned analysis of molecular subtypes in the VESPER trial could help predict which patients may achieve complete response and better outcome.

1 December 2021 in Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStéphane Culine
Stéphane Culine
VHValentin Harter
Valentin Harter
GGGwenaelle Gravis
Gwenaelle Gravis
AFAude Fléchon
Aude Fléchon
CCChristine Chevreau
Christine Chevreau
CPChristian Pfister
Christian Pfister

10 September 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChristian PFISTER
Christian PFISTER
VHValentin Harter
Valentin Harter
YAYves Allory
Yves Allory
SCStéphane Culine
Stéphane Culine
FIfor the VESPER Trial Investigators
for the VESPER Trial Investigators

1 December 2017 in Annales de Pathologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FRFlorence Renaud
Florence Renaud
FBFrédéric Bibeau
Frédéric Bibeau
ELEmmanuelle Leteurtre
Emmanuelle Leteurtre
CDChristine Delaeter
Christine Delaeter
MDMalek Dib
Malek Dib
CMChristophe Mariette
Christophe Mariette

12 September 2025 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
RRRoman Rouzier
Roman Rouzier
VHValentin Harter
Valentin Harter
EREthan Rouzier
Ethan Rouzier
VFVictor Ferment
Victor Ferment
SGSimon Gruau
Simon Gruau
NVNicolas Vigneron
Nicolas Vigneron
Cancer staging plays a critical role in treatment planning and prognosis but is often embedded in unstructured clinical narratives. To automate the extraction and structuring of staging data, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach. However, their performance in real-world oncology settings has yet to be systematically evaluated. Herein, we analysed 1000 oncological summaries from patients receiving treatment for breast cancer between 2019 and 2020 at the François Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Centre, France. Five Mistral artificial intelligence–based LLMs were evaluated (i.e. Small, Medium, Large, Magistral and Mistral:latest) for their ability to derive the cancer stage and identify staging elements. Larger models outperformed their smaller counterparts in staging accuracy and reproducibility (kappa > 0.95 for Mistral Large and Medium). Mistral Large achieved the highest accuracy in deriving the cancer stage (93.0%), surpassing the original clinical documentation in several cases. The LLMs consistently performed better in deriving the cancer stage when working through tumour size, nodal status and metastatic components compared to when they were directly requested stage data. The top-performing models had a test–retest reliability exceeding 97%, while smaller models and locally deployed versions lacked sufficient robustness, particularly in handling unit conversions and complex staging rules. The structured, stepwise use of LLMs that emulates clinician reasoning offers a more efficient, transparent and reproducible approach to cancer staging, and the study findings support LLM integration into digital oncology workflows.