Pradeep Sharma

Dr. Pradeep Sharma

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2012 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPradeep Sharma
Pradeep Sharma
CBCaroline J. Butters
Caroline J. Butters
VSVeronica Smith
Veronica Smith
RERobert Elsby
Robert Elsby
DSDominic Surry
Dominic Surry

16 June 2015 in Molecular Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAndrea Testa
Andrea Testa
MZMatteo Zanda
Matteo Zanda
Charles S ElmoreCharles S Elmore
Charles S Elmore
PSPradeep Sharma
Pradeep Sharma

11 November 2009 in Xenobiotica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPradeep Sharma
Pradeep Sharma
VHV. E. Holmes
V. E. Holmes
RER. Elsby
R. Elsby
CLC. Lambert
C. Lambert
DSD. Surry
D. Surry
Transporters are carrier proteins that may influence pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicological characteristics of drugs. The development of validated in vitro transporter models is impera...

15 November 2023 in Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMonika Berezowska
Monika Berezowska
PSPradeep Sharma
Pradeep Sharma
VRVenkatesh Pilla Reddy
Venkatesh Pilla Reddy
PCPaola Coppola
Paola Coppola

1 February 2017 in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ATAndrea Testa
Andrea Testa
SDSergio Dall'Angelo
Sergio Dall'Angelo
MMMarco Mingarelli
Marco Mingarelli
AAAndrea Augello
Andrea Augello
LSLutz Schweiger
Lutz Schweiger
MZMatteo Zanda
Matteo Zanda
With the aim of identifying a fluorinated bile acid derivative that could be used as [18F]-labeled Positron Emission Tomography (PET) tracer for imaging the in vivo functioning of liver transporter proteins, and particularly of OATP1B1, three fluorinated bile acid triazole derivatives of cholic, deoxycholic and lithocholic acid (CATD, DCATD and LCATD 4a-c, respectively) were synthesized and labeled with tritium. In vitro transport properties were studied with cell-based assays to identify the best substrate for OATP1B1. In addition, the lead compound, LCATD (4c), was tested as a substrate of other liver uptake transporters OATP1B3, NTCP and efflux transporter BSEP to evaluate its specificity of liver transport. The results suggest that 4c is a good substrate of OATP1B1 and NTCP, whereas it is a poor substrate of OATP1B3. The efflux transporter BSEP also appears to be involved in the excretion of 4c from hepatocytes. The automated radiosynthesis of [18F]-4c was accomplished in a multi-GBq scale and a pilot imaging experiment in a wild type rat was performed after i.v. administration to assess the biodistribution and clearance of the tracer. PET imaging revealed that radioactivity was primarily located in the liver (tmax=75s) and cleared exclusively through the bile, thus allowing to image the hepatobiliary excretion of bile acids in the animal model. These findings suggest that [18F]-LCATD 4c is a promising PET probe for the evaluation of hepatic transporters OATP1B1, NTCP and BSEP activity with potential for studying drug-drug interactions and drug-induced toxicity involving these transporters.

4 April 2022 in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMorgan A. Butrovich
Morgan A. Butrovich
WTWeifeng Tang
Weifeng Tang
DBDavid W. Boulton
David W. Boulton
TNThomas D. Nolin
Thomas D. Nolin
PSPradeep Sharma
Pradeep Sharma
We characterized the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4–mediated metabolism of saxagliptin to its metabolite, 5‐hydroxysaxagliptin, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. A PBPK model of saxagliptin and its CYP3A4 metabolite, 5‐hydroxysaxagliptin, was constructed and validated for oral doses ranging from 5 to 100 mg. The observed ratios of area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) between healthy subjects and subjects with CKD were compared with those predicted using PBPK model simulations. Simulations were performed with virtual CKD populations having decreased CYP3A4 activity (ie, 64%‐75% of the healthy subjects’ CYP3A4 abundance) and preserved CYP3A4 activity (ie, 100% of the healthy subjects’ CYP3A4 abundance). We found that simulations using decreased CYP3A4 activity generally overpredicted the ratios of saxagliptin AUC and Cmax in CKD compared with those using preserved CYP3A4 activity. Similarly, simulations using decreased CYP3A4 activity underpredicted the ratio of 5‐hydroxysaxagliptin AUC in moderate and severe CKD compared with simulations using preserved CYP3A4 activity. These findings suggest that decreased CYP3A4 activity in CKD underpredicts saxagliptin clearance compared with that observed clinically. Preserving CYP3A4 activity in CKD more closely estimates saxagliptin clearance and 5‐hydroxysaxagliptin exposure changes observed in vivo. Our findings suggest that there is no clinically meaningful impact of CKD on the metabolism of saxagliptin by CYP3A4. Since saxagliptin is not a highly sensitive substrate and validated probe for CYP3A4, this work represents a case study of a CYP3A4 substrate‐metabolite pair and is not a generalization for all CYP3A4 substrates.