Mojca Milavec

Dr. Mojca Milavec

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 May 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDany Morisset
Dany Morisset
DŠDejan Štebih
Dejan Štebih
MMMojca Milavec
Mojca Milavec
KGKristina Gruden
Kristina Gruden
JŽJana Žel
Jana Žel
In this study, the applicability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for routine analysis in food and feed samples was demonstrated with the quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is currently used for quantitative molecular analysis of the presence of GMOs in products. However, its use is limited for detecting and quantifying very small numbers of DNA targets, as in some complex food and feed matrices. Using ddPCR duplex assay, we have measured the absolute numbers of MON810 transgene and hmg maize reference gene copies in DNA samples. Key performance parameters of the assay were determined. The ddPCR system is shown to offer precise absolute and relative quantification of targets, without the need for calibration curves. The sensitivity (five target DNA copies) of the ddPCR assay compares well with those of individual qPCR assays and of the chamber digital PCR (cdPCR) approach. It offers a dynamic range over four orders of magnitude, greater than that of cdPCR. Moreover, when compared to qPCR, the ddPCR assay showed better repeatability at low target concentrations and a greater tolerance to inhibitors. Finally, ddPCR throughput and cost are advantageous relative to those of qPCR for routine GMO quantification. It is thus concluded that ddPCR technology can be applied for routine quantification of GMOs, or any other domain where quantitative analysis of food and feed samples is needed.

31 August 2014 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTanja Dreo
Tanja Dreo
MPManca Pirc
Manca Pirc
Živa RamšakŽiva Ramšak
Živa Ramšak
JPJernej Pavšič
Jernej Pavšič
MMMojca Milavec
Mojca Milavec
KGKristina Gruden
Kristina Gruden

1 October 2019 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAlexandra Bogožalec Košir
Alexandra Bogožalec Košir
TDTina Demšar
Tina Demšar
DŠDejan Štebih
Dejan Štebih
JŽJana Žel
Jana Žel
MMMojca Milavec
Mojca Milavec
The increased use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is accompanied by increased complexity of the matrices that contain GMOs. The most common DNA-based approach for GMO detection and quantification is real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). However, as qPCR is sensitive to inhibitors and relies on standard curves for quantification, it has limited application in GMO quantification for complex matrices. To overcome this hurdle in DNA quantification, we present droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays that were designed to target 'Roundup Ready' soybean and the soybean reference gene. Three ddPCR assays were transferred from qPCR to QX100/QX200 ddPCR platforms and characterised. Together, the fitness-for-purpose study on four real-life samples and the use of a chamber-based PCR system, showed that dPCR has great potential to improve such measurements in GMO testing and monitoring of food authenticity.

31 October 2015 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJernej Pavšič
Jernej Pavšič
JŽJana Žel
Jana Žel
MMMojca Milavec
Mojca Milavec
Digital PCR (dPCR) is beginning to supersede real-time PCR (qPCR) for quantification of nucleic acids in many different applications. Several analytical properties of the two most commonly used dPCR platforms, namely the QX100 system (Bio-Rad) and the 12.765 array of the Biomark system (Fluidigm), have already been evaluated and compared with those of qPCR. However, to the best of our knowledge, direct comparison between the three of these platforms using the same DNA material has not been done, and the 37 K array on the Biomark system has also not been evaluated in terms of linearity, analytical sensitivity and limit of quantification. Here, a first assessment of qPCR, the QX100 system and both arrays of the Biomark system was performed with plasmid and genomic DNA from human cytomegalovirus. With use of PCR components that alter the efficiency of qPCR, each dPCR platform demonstrated consistent copy-number estimations, which indicates the high resilience of dPCR. Two approaches, one considering the total reaction volume and the other considering the effective reaction size, were used to assess linearity, analytical sensitivity and variability. When the total reaction volume was considered, the best performance was observed with qPCR, followed by the QX100 system and the Biomark system. In contrast, when the effective reaction size was considered, all three platforms showed almost equal limits of detection and variability. Although dPCR might not always be more appropriate than qPCR for quantification of low copy numbers, dPCR is a suitable method for robust and reproducible quantification of viral DNA, and a promising technology for the higher-order reference measurement method.

18 October 2013 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IHIngrid Huber
Ingrid Huber
ABAnnette Block
Annette Block
DSDaniela Sebah
Daniela Sebah
FDFrédéric Debode
Frédéric Debode
DMDany Morisset
Dany Morisset
UBUlrich Busch
Ulrich Busch

16 August 2014 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMojca Milavec
Mojca Milavec
DDDavid Dobnik
David Dobnik
LYLitao Yang
Litao Yang
DZDabing Zhang
Dabing Zhang
KGKristina Gruden
Kristina Gruden
JŽJana Žel
Jana Žel