Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ketotifen for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Methods: A total of 108 enrolled IBS-D patients were randomly divided into a ketotifen group (n = 55) and a control (placebo) group (n = 53). The patients in the ketotifen group received ketotifen tablets (1 mg, oral) two times daily; patients in the control group received oral placebo for 8 weeks. Before and after 8 weeks of treatment, gastrointestinal symptoms, anorectal sensory function and the number and activity status of mast cells were assessed for both groups. Results: (1) The overall effective rate of gastrointestinal symptom improvement in the ketotifen group was significantly higher than that in the control group (76.4 vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001). (2) First sensation, defecation urgency and discomfort/pain threshold in the ketotifen group improved significantly after treatment (P < 0.05); no significant changes were observed in the control group (P > 0.05). (3) In the ketotifen group, the number of mast cells in the terminal ileum decreased, and the percentages of degranulated mast cells in the sigmoid colon, ascending colon and terminal ileum decreased significantly after treatment compared with before treatment; these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). In the control group, the number of mast cells and the percentages of degranulated mast cells in various sites did not change significantly before and after treatment (P > 0.05). (4) Six patients (10.9%) in the ketotifen group experienced drowsiness and fatigue, but the symptoms disappeared after 1 week of treatment. Conclusion: Ketotifen significantly alleviated gastrointestinal symptoms and improved visceral hypersensitivity in patients with IBS-D. The therapeutic effect of ketotifen is related to a reduced number and decreased activity of mast cells in the intestinal mucosa, especially in the terminal ileum.

Background/Aims: Malignant biliary strictures (MBS) are very aggressive and cannot be diagnosed in the early stages due to their asymptomatic nature. Stenting the stricture area of the biliary tree is palliative treatment but has poor survival time. Radiofrequency ablation plus stent (RFA+S) have been recently used to improve the survival and stent patency time in patients with MBS. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we tried to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation. Materials and Methods: Study search up to December 2021 was performed in different medical databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library, etc. We selected eligible studies reporting survival time, stent patency time, and adverse events in patients with MBS. We compare the outcomes of RFA+S and stent-alone treatment groups. Results: A total of 15 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) with 1815 patients were included for meta-analysis of which 701 patients were in RFA+S group and 1114 patients in the stent-alone group. Pooled mean difference of survival time was 2.88 months (95% CI: 1.78-3.97) and pooled mean difference of stent patency time was 2.11 months (95% CI: 0.91-3.30) and clinical success risk ratio was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01–1.09). Risk ratios for adverse events are given; Bleeding 0.84 (95% CI: 0.34-2.11), abdominal pain 1.06 (95% CI: 0.79-1.40), pancreatitis 0.93 (95% CI: 0.43-2.01), cholangitis 1.07 (95% CI: 0.72-1.59), and stent dysfunction 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.07). Conclusions: Radiofrequency ablation is involved in increased survival and stent patency time for MBS patients. With the help of better techniques, adverse events can be limited.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by autodigestion of the pancreas, and some patients may rapidly progress to systemic inflammation, pancreatic necrosis, and multi-organ failure. Numerous studies have detailed the bidirectional communication networks between the pancreas and the intestinal microbiota, as well as its metabolites. Such crosstalk affects the progression of AP and recovery through intestinal barrier disruption. Furthermore, advances in experimental research and clinical studies have indicated that gut microorganisms exhibit distinct alterations in response to different levels of severity and etiologies of AP. This information has greatly expanded our knowledge of the role of the gut microflora and microbial metabolites in the pathology of disease and has reinforced the basis of therapeutic approaches that target candidate intestinal microbiota. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the composition and diversity of the gut microbial community, to highlight the candidate bacteria and microbiota-derived metabolites responsible for AP, and to elucidate their interactions with and regulation of immune-relevant receptors in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) in the host. Future research should focus on identifying and characterizing AP-associated bacterial strains, elucidating their distinct pathogenic mechanisms across different etiologies and stages of AP, and leveraging these insights to develop preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Patients with walled-off necrosis (WON) are still challenging to treat safely and effectively. Recently, double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS), bi-flanged metallic stents (BFMS), and lumen-apposing m... What is the best endoscopic treatment option for the walled-off necrosis (WON)?A brief comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), bi-flanged metallic stents (BFMS) and double-pigtail plastic...

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of recurrent chronic inflammatory diseases, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Although IBD has been extensively studied for decades, its cause and pathogenesis remain unclear. Existing research suggests that IBD may be the result of an interaction between genetic factors, environmental factors and the gut microbiome. IBD is closely related to non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). NcRNAs are composed of microRNA(miRNA), long non-coding RNA(lnc RNA) and circular RNA(circ RNA). Compared with miRNA, the role of lnc RNA in IBD has been little studied. Lnc RNA is an RNA molecule that regulates gene expression and regulates a variety of molecular pathways involved in the pathbiology of IBD. Targeting IBD-associated lnc RNAs may promote personalized treatment of IBD and have therapeutic value for IBD patients. Therefore, this review summarized the effects of lnc RNA on the intestinal epithelial barrier, inflammatory response and immune homeostasis in IBD, and summarized the potential of lnc RNA as a biomarker of IBD and as a predictor of therapeutic response to IBD in the future.

Pancreatic cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with limited treatment options and low long-term survival rates. The complex and variable signal regulation networks are one of the important reasons why it is difficult for pancreatic cancer to develop precise targeted therapy drugs. Numerous studies have associated feedback loop regulation with the development and therapeutic response of cancers including pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we review researches on the role of feedback loops in the progression of pancreatic cancer, and summarize the connection between feedback loops and several signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer, as well as recent advances in the intervention of feedback loops in pancreatic cancer treatment, highlighting the potential of capitalizing on feedback loops modulation in targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer.