There is no universally accepted method for evaluating cadmium (Cd) bioavailability in soil. The diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) technique is a promising tool, but there is considerable debate about its suitability. The ability of this technique to estimate Cd bioavailability in soils was compared with the abilities of other traditional chemical extraction techniques (soil solution, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), acetic acid (HAc), calcium chloride (CaCl₂), and pseudo-total Cd methods) based on a greenhouse experiment using pakchoi (Brassica chinensis) grown in 15 soils from different provinces of China. In addition, we assessed whether these methods were independent of the soil properties. Correlations between the plant and soil Cd concentrations measured with the traditional extraction techniques were dependent on the pH and organic carbon (OC) content, indicating that these methods are influenced by the soil properties. In contrast, the DGT measurements were independent of the soil properties and showed a higher correlation coefficient compared to that of the traditional techniques. Hence, the DGT technique is better and should be preferable for assessing Cd biological effectiveness in different soil types.

The traditional soil potassium (K) testing methods fail to accurately predict K requirement by plants. The Diffusive Gradients in Thin-films (DGT) method is promising, but the relationship between the DGT-measured K pool and plant available K is not clear. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Frame) was grown in 9 Australian broad acre agricultural soils in a glasshouse trial until the end of tillering growth stage (GS30) with different plant K demands generated by varying plant numbers and pot sizes. Different K concentrations in soils were varied by 4 rates of K fertilizer application. The relative dry matter and K uptake were plotted against the soil K test value (CaCl₂, Colwell and NH₄OAc and DGT K measurements). To obtain 90% of maximum relative dry matter at low root density (closest to field conditions), the critical value of the NH₄OAc K method was 91 (R² = 0.56) mg kg⁻¹. The DGT K method was not able to accurately predict relative dry matter or K uptake due to a weak extraction force for K from soils with high CEC values. Further endeavor on increasing K extraction force of the DGT method is warranted to obtain accurate plant available K results.